jyde said:Can't believe they're using the pirate theme for advertising
I took it for granted that the only problem was Hampton? Afterall they were the only ones to make up the robotproblem. I thought it was a matter of hours before his other accounts were reopened - especially after McMains posts.Actually, I think this is a sure sign that C21 will be paid.
So you're saying he should just have said "harbours" instead of ports and not referred to the "21" crewmembers?casinomeister said:If "RTG's Caribbean 21" thread that was initially started - with the references to ports and all - had not been scrutinized for hacker-lingo, this would seem totally appropriate
That's the anti-hacking clause. However "if you are found cheating" can probably be used in every scenario where a player winscasinomeister said:8h. If you are found cheating or if it is determined by Delano Casino that you have used a system or machine, be, it an additional computer, additional software or otherwise used to circumvent the natural randomness of our systems
Too vague. Me thinks statements like these will begin to disappear from RTG casino T&C pages.if you are found cheating...
casinomeister said:Too vague. Me thinks statements like these will begin to disappear from RTG casino T&C pages.
portia said:In recent past the play logs were sent out by RTG not the casino. Can you confirm that Pc21's play logs are available to him as he requested in the other thread on this forum?
portia said:Are you able to state what is the basis of the monthly payments liscensees pay to RTG now?
jetset said:If I might add one more question just for clarification, please - during the exhaustive tests on the software did RTG personnel also check out Pirate's gaming logs? If so, did they similarly not suggest the use of a bot?
If not, then I would suggest that Pirate's request for his gaming logs from Hampton be granted direct by RTG (can't trust Hampton as a middleman)
It's getting better and better. RTG didn't even LOOK for robotplay. Why would they?RTG_MMcMain said:Our investigation was not conducted to determine if he did or didn't use, a BOT. Game log review could not definitively answer that question.
jyde said:Mr. McMain - in a situation like this, would the licensee or a third party have full access (all details) to the game logs?
spearmaster said:Could this perhaps be why they are evasive? This was certainly the case when I checked... and this link is from around that time.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
If RTG have suddenly stopped collecting royalties, I am certainly not aware of this fact.
Ah yes, true this may be, in part. But it really has little bearing on the outcome - for all intents and purposes we're talking about the same people. Also, it makes no sense for RTG to state on their own website that a monthly royalty must be paid in addition to licensing fees, and then say that the payments are negotiable depending on circumstances, if they were not the representatives of the mysterious Panamanian 3rd party known as Montana.LemmeSeeHere said:Spearmaster,
The distinction is that casino operators do not license directly from RTG. They license from a mysterious 3rd party (based in Panama) called Montana. Montana receives all royalties from RTG operators.
Presumably, Montana pays RTG some sort of flat fee for the software.
LemmeSeeHere said:Spearmaster,
The distinction is that casino operators do not license directly from RTG. They license from a mysterious 3rd party (based in Panama) called Montana. Montana receives all royalties from RTG operators.
Presumably, Montana pays RTG some sort of flat fee for the software.