PR: NEW HOPE FOR GRAND PRIVE AFFILIATES

And in the meantime I get a CD in the post from them to play at their casino... the only place they could have gotten my mailing address is from my affiliate account - I have never signed up to a casino of theirs...

So, first they cut out the affiliates and then use their addresses to send CD's to...

What a stand up operation :rolleyes::puke:

I've never promoted them EVER. Yet I also received a cd from them a couple of weeks ago. So me thinks they have bought a player list somewhere :mad:
 
Future of AGD: I know there are folks who want to 'paint us' as working (or aligning ourselves) with CAP. This is done to cloud our image, only, and there is not a shred of truth in it. We worked together on this 1 project and solely for the benefit of affiliates.

  • AGD is not and never will be funded by CAP or Affiliate Media.
  • AGD is not and never will be funded by GPWA or Casino City.
  • AGD is not and never will be funded by APCW.
  • AGD/Andy/ME is in control of EVERYTHING that is AffiliateGuardDog.com. Nobody else owns any part of it nor has any directorship abilities. All decisions are 100% mine and always will be.

'Politics' is something that I am not and never will be party to. :) I only care about affiliates (I am one myself). That's it, folks! :thumbsup:

Maybe this is the reason why uwin & betpresto start to behave like grand prive?

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
On the face of it this doesn't look good at all - has anyone spoken to the companies concerned to see what they have to say for themselves? GPWA perhaps?

And if BetPartners is based on Malta it may well be a good idea for him/her to call the attention of the LGA to what's happening here, and how that might impact on the LGA's reputation?
 
And if BetPartners is based on Malta it may well be a good idea for him/her to call the attention of the LGA to what's happening here, and how that might impact on the LGA's reputation?

What reputation Jet? :p

Sorry, not to make light of a bad situation at all...it's just that Malta has turned out to be an even bigger disappointment than Kahnawake. I wouldn't suggest anyone hold their breath waiting for ANY kind of answer from them, on any situation.
 
What reputation Jet? :p

Sorry, not to make light of a bad situation at all...it's just that Malta has turned out to be an even bigger disappointment than Kahnawake. I wouldn't suggest anyone hold their breath waiting for ANY kind of answer from them, on any situation.

I really don't feel it is productive to simply give up on actions seeking to address apparently blatant wrongs like this.

If the guy/gal is in Malta he/she can knock on doors and speak to politicians, all of which may spur the LGA into action. It is certainly worth trying.

The CEO of the LGA, Reuben Portanier, has been making changes aimed at improving the LGA administration and is on record recently as accepting that things can and will be addressed....this is perhaps an opportunity for him to prove that he is not just blowing media smoke up the industry's ass imo.

Along with other interested parties, one of my stops at ICEi next week is going to be the LGA where I hope to connect with Portanier to impress on him the importance of player-centric improvements in the way this body does business.

Malta has considerable potential to enhance industry regulation imo; simply writing them off, along with efforts to prod them into action, is not going to achieve anything at all.

Edited to add that much the same can be said for Kahnawake Gaming Commission, another highly controversial subject: it does not have a good rep with players and that's absolutely understandable given incidents in the past.

However, there have been a number of recent reports suggesting that the KGC are at last starting to get with the program, in that they have called in respected industry individuals to guide them in better organising critical operations like player dispute procedures and regulatory compliance and enforcement that bites.

I know....the proof of the pudding will lie in the eating, but that's no reason to dismiss out of hand attempts that could be genuine to make improvements. At least that should be encouraged and not blasted out-of-hand imo.
 
Along with other interested parties, one of my stops at ICEi next week is going to be the LGA where I hope to connect with Portanier to impress on him the importance of player-centric improvements in the way this body does business.

Malta has considerable potential to enhance industry regulation imo; simply writing them off, along with efforts to prod them into action, is not going to achieve anything at all.

I hope you'll give us a rundown of what transpires Jetset? I hadn't realized there was any "forward" movement with the LGA, and absolutely agree that the potential is there to actually make a difference....if they'd just grow some teeth, and actually give a damn.

Will look forward to any news you have to report. :thumbsup:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Click here for Red Cherry Casino

Meister Ratings

Back
Top