external image

North Korea and US politics

Status
Not open for further replies.
No, im Pooh, the country cousin.
This is Po.



View attachment 142858
:rolleyes:

nice try Kroffe, we know pandas arent real bears


here's photo proof of his dad; so clearly pandas are geese

ping.webp
 


Yeah, yeah I know... Polls are fake news. Either way: :lolup:

2.5 questions.
Are there any polls about who is going to win the election?
How does one compete in "landslide", and how does one win in it?

I picture it like a slip n slide, but on asphalt, but that cant be right.
 
2.5 questions.
Are there any polls about who is going to win the election?
How does one compete in "landslide", and how does one win in it?

I picture it like a slip n slide, but on asphalt, but that cant be right.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
compiles a shitload of polls

Old Attachment (Invalid)

You decide if you want to compete in THAT.
 
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
compiles a shitload of polls

Old Attachment (Invalid)

You decide if you want to compete in THAT.
Obviously i would decline.
I still dont understand the rules, and without a good grasp on the rules i just dont think it would be any fun.
 


Will be interesting to see what @mack341 and @slotplayer will call these people.

Thugs and other words they used for demonstrators (peaceful or not) or along the line they prefer more, like "fine people on......" and patriots.

Also, this started in spring after Mr T famously tweeted "LIBERATE MICHIGAN" in all caps and you had the "fine patriots" storming the statehouse with automatic rifles. Mr "head bootlicker" Billy Barr, Mr T and other cult members were defending them at the time. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Can't speak for Mack or slotplayer, but if it was as sincere as the allegation is trying to suggest, then personally I'd call every one of those thousands of people who somehow all got involved in this plot, a bunch of low IQ, dangerous idiots. Imagine if it was just a handful though? like 6 or so.
Well, thousands of people, or 6. Dangerous idiots are dangerous idiots.

Luckily, they didn't get the chance to ruin anybodys lives. But like I'd call every single person who decided it would be cool to destroy the livelihoods of random people they don't even know, by destroying or/and looting their businesses, just like I'd call the idiots who gather in crowds outside people's houses, making a scene, taunting, scaring the shit out of any children that might be living there... all for no other reason than doing so because the pelple inside either support orange man, are white, or both...
Well. Yeah. I'd call them completely stupid, fucking idiots.
 
I had a conversation with a colleague today, who for some reason seems to think Trump is the greatest President ever and I asked him what has Trump done for America.
He told me he was saving it from socialism, he was getting everyone in America free healthcare and he had brought the economy out of recession. I had a massive eye roll at that and just realised that people are so gullible that they dont want to open their eyes, they just want to swallow every lie that Trump peddles.
All I can say is thank God my colleague cant vote.
 
I had a conversation with a colleague today, who for some reason seems to think Trump is the greatest President ever and I asked him what has Trump done for America.
He told me he was saving it from socialism, he was getting everyone in America free healthcare and he had brought the economy out of recession. I had a massive eye roll at that and just realised that people are so gullible that they dont want to open their eyes, they just want to swallow every lie that Trump peddles.
All I can say is thank God my colleague cant vote.
Free health care eh?
Was he saving them from or giving them socialism? ;)

And before anyone says it, i know its not free.
But sure beats dying from not affording to go to the hospital.
 
Can't speak for Mack or slotplayer, but if it was as sincere as the allegation is trying to suggest, then personally I'd call every one of those thousands of people who somehow all got involved in this plot, a bunch of low IQ, dangerous idiots. Imagine if it was just a handful though? like 6 or so.
Well, thousands of people, or 6. Dangerous idiots are dangerous idiots.

Luckily, they didn't get the chance to ruin anybodys lives. But like I'd call every single person who decided it would be cool to destroy the livelihoods of random people they don't even know, by destroying or/and looting their businesses, just like I'd call the idiots who gather in crowds outside people's houses, making a scene, taunting, scaring the shit out of any children that might be living there... all for no other reason than doing so because the pelple inside either support orange man, are white, or both...
Well. Yeah. I'd call them completely stupid, fucking idiots.

No violence, no matter from what side is warranted, nor should it be condoned or encouraged, especially not by presidents.

BTW, to your comment - "like 6 or so". These people are armed up to their teeth, thousands of people with some pepper spray and "soup cans" are surely not comparable.

1602192402026.png
 
pepper sprey and soup cans? lol I see youve been welll informed.
So going to random residents houses, in large numbers, while - lets assume - everyone is unarmed (lol, alrigghty then) , is not comparable to 6, 6 people who have , according to the lol msm that i forced myself to read earlier, have planned this for 6 months? hzve been ynder surveillance, scoping out the wokans house?
6 months, and they STILL want "200 men" . lol . Sounds like they need to read a bit of history, and read from the communist revolution handbook, tbqhwy.

dafuq planet are you on Harry? I'm starting to think you were serious when you said you get most of your info from the bbc news. Might of been worthwhile watching live streams during these peaceful protests instead, for the past few months , to actually get an idea of what these mostly peaceful protesters are doing in ceartin places... and get an idea of what weapons they do carry.

Obviously, unlike the bbc, that involves watching more than the 5 minute pieces per day they want to show.
But perhaps you're right, the black police officer, whatever his name was (i forget, and im sure as do most, thanks for that one, msm) who tried to protect innocent people during these peaceful riots, was just collateral damage. Who cares what his name was though? doesnt benefit this shit show of an agenda. Media Media ceartinly didn't care.

The molotov bombs, knives and guns, amongst the carried amongst the vastly outnumbering, intimidating "peaceful protesters", wouldn't have made much difference. Not when its 50 or 100, facing 1 family who have done nothing wrong other than trying to live their own lives.Who needs weapons there? What are the family gonna do? Pump 20 magazines into everyone who is either trespassing or demanding they come out and face the thuggish mob?

Yeah that'll go down well. Doesn't really help when the police force for the most part, look away from this thuggish behaviour. But then, it is in liberal states this happenx a lot of the time too, coincidently, and those who do give a fuck are risking their ass for protecting civilia

Obviously, and obviously i hate this word, but obviously all violence is disgusting . That shouldn't need to be said. But the amount of suffering that these low IQ idiots who probably have already forgotten what they were originally "protesting" for, is countless.
Live streaming footage confirms that. The bbc, your beloved information source, seems to refuse to acknowledge it. This shocks me so much, living in the UK.Having watched the BBC news more times than all other news channel I've ever watched combined, it really shocks me.

:p

edit. excuse the spelling. tablets are shit and im having such a shit evening i cba to check it
 
pepper sprey and soup cans? lol I see youve been welll informed.
So going to random residents houses, in large numbers, while - lets assume - everyone is unarmed (lol, alrigghty then) , is not comparable to 6, 6 people who have , according to the lol msm that i forced myself to read earlier, have planned this for 6 months? hzve been ynder surveillance, scoping out the wokans house?
6 months, and they STILL want "200 men" . lol . Sounds like they need to read a bit of history, and read from the communist revolution handbook, tbqhwy.

dafuq planet are you on Harry? I'm starting to think you were serious when you said you get most of your info from the bbc news. Might of been worthwhile watching live streams during these peaceful protests instead, for the past few months , to actually get an idea of what these mostly peaceful protesters are doing in ceartin places... and get an idea of what weapons they do carry.

Obviously, unlike the bbc, that involves watching more than the 5 minute pieces per day they want to show.
But perhaps you're right, the black police officer, whatever his name was (i forget, and im sure as do most, thanks for that one, msm) who tried to protect innocent people during these peaceful riots, was just collateral damage. Who cares what his name was though? doesnt benefit this shit show of an agenda. Media Media ceartinly didn't care.

The molotov bombs, knives and guns, amongst the carried amongst the vastly outnumbering, intimidating "peaceful protesters", wouldn't have made much difference. Not when its 50 or 100, facing 1 family who have done nothing wrong other than trying to live their own lives.Who needs weapons there? What are the family gonna do? Pump 20 magazines into everyone who is either trespassing or demanding they come out and face the thuggish mob?

Yeah that'll go down well. Doesn't really help when the police force for the most part, look away from this thuggish behaviour. But then, it is in liberal states this happenx a lot of the time too, coincidently, and those who do give a fuck are risking their ass for protecting civilia

Obviously, and obviously i hate this word, but obviously all violence is disgusting . That shouldn't need to be said. But the amount of suffering that these low IQ idiots who probably have already forgotten what they were originally "protesting" for, is countless.
Live streaming footage confirms that. The bbc, your beloved information source, seems to refuse to acknowledge it. This shocks me so much, living in the UK.Having watched the BBC news more times than all other news channel I've ever watched combined, it really shocks me.

:p

edit. excuse the spelling. tablets are shit and im having such a shit evening i cba to check it

First, I haven't watched BBC News for over a decade and my TV during that time had 4 channels - BBC1 and 2, ITV and Channel 4. I left the UK in 2002, so there is that.

Second, I have a news feed on all day, that shows me news headlines from over 50 channels worldwide in 4 languages, updated every 5 mins, so there's the that.

Third, I said in my very first sentence that violence is in no way acceptable, no matter what side.

Fourth, "soup cans" is what Mr T the fool that he is brandished as the most dangerous weapon they used in the protests. :D You can google it to find out.

Fifth, I urge you to give up most of the things you consider normal or feel entitled today, e.g. 5-day work week, paid holidays, NHS, pension, etc. Because most of those are liberal ideas and were achieved after much bigger protests, plus, in most cases much more violent, especially when strong unions were involved. Maybe you can read some of the UK's history to find out. Not that it justifies violence but I see that you all rather enjoy having the privileges yet think that "libruls" are the scum of the earth.

Sixth, to always try and paint the "liberal side" as violent and poor in handling protests is simply pathetic. I posted just a few days ago what Mr T's DHS sycophants see as the largest domestic thread to the US - right-wing extremists. That they have to admit that in an official report, although they always try to blame liberal states and cities, should be proof enough for you. So spare me, the "liberal" blame game.

I could say a lot more but lastly, all violent protesters and looters should be prosecuted/fined/whatever is in the law, no exceptions.

"Fine people" on this pic, right?

1602215842059.png
 
Last edited:
Still hard to get my head round how you can stoat around somewhere fully loaded given i was stopped only a few weeks ago for brandishing an energy drink as the fine folk at Police Scotland thought it was a can of beer.

'what's that?'

'Quizzical look? Meant to be a drink, but it's more sugar than liquid? Why?

'You can't drink alcohol on the street'

'Good to know'

'So what is it?'

'I told you (puts can within 2m of their face) - if you want anti social drinking you can go to that park over there though?'

Huffs and shuffles off

The Police must have been having a slow recruitment season that year.
 
First, I haven't watched BBC News for over a decade and my TV during that time had 4 channels - BBC1 and 2, ITV and Channel 4. I left the UK in 2002, so there is that.

Second, I have a news feed on all day, that shows me news headlines from over 50 channels worldwide in 4 languages, updated every 5 mins, so there's the that.

Third, I said in my very first sentence that violence is in no way acceptable, no matter what side.

Fourth, "soup cans" is what Mr T the fool that he is brandished as the most dangerous weapon they used in the protests. :D You can google it to find out.

Fifth, I urge you to give up most of the things you consider normal or feel entitled today, e.g. 5-day work week, paid holidays, NHS, pension, etc. Because most of those are liberal ideas and were achieved after much bigger protests, plus, in most cases much more violent, especially when strong unions were involved. Maybe you can read some of the UK's history to find out. Not that it justifies violence but I see that you all rather enjoy having the privileges yet think that "libruls" are the scum of the earth.

Sixth, to always try and paint the "liberal side" as violent and poor in handling protests is simply pathetic. I posted just a few days ago what Mr T's DHS sycophants see as the largest domestic thread to the US - right-wing extremists. That they have to admit that in an official report, although they always try to blame liberal states and cities, should be proof enough for you. So spare me, the "liberal" blame game.

I could say a lot more but lastly, all violent protesters and looters should be prosecuted/fined/whatever is in the law, no exceptions.

"Fine people" on this pic, right?

View attachment 142898
I also have news feeds from all over the world, but in 6 different languages.
I only speak one of them.
Its all very confusing, but i like the pictures.
 
Interesting story.

One of the main hilarious points I saw was the fact that the supposed multi-multi-multi billionaire needed a guarantor for a paltry $30 million loan. The successful businessman? :rolleyes:

Assuming he has indeed $1 billion (which he most probably does not have but bless him if he has), that would be akin someone making $100,000 needing a guarantor for a $300 loan. :D :D

 
Interesting story.

One of the main hilarious points I saw was the fact that the supposed multi-multi-multi billionaire needed a guarantor for a paltry $30 million loan. The successful businessman? :rolleyes:

Assuming he has indeed $1 billion (which he most probably does not have but bless him if he has), that would be akin someone making $100,000 needing a guarantor for a $300 loan. :D :D


Wouldnt be surprised if he didnt have 2 beans, for Trump its all smoke and mirrors, sell the belief that he is a successful billionaire and pawn out his name.
It would make sense that his tax for the year is $750 if he is as skint as it appears he may be.
 
From the NYT reports

- Mr T never made money from his own businesses and had countless bankruptcies/failures etc.
- Mr T squandered away $1 billion in the '90s
- Mr T made a ton of money by selling his name and from businesses that do not belong to him
- Mr T ploughed that profit into his failing businesses or buying new ones which are also losing money
- None of Mr T's properties actually belong to him yet as he has large loans on all of them or owns a share only.
- Mr T is personally liable for $421 million in loans becoming due in the next few years. (No way that he has that kind of cash on hand)

Overall however, fair play to him. He played the system pretty well to keep his image as a successful businessman while being nothing even close to that. He has perfected though the snakeoil salesmanship, hence, he is indeed good at something, even when it is just goldplated stuff he's got everywhere on his properties.

It is a way of life, I guess. Whether I or others will want to teach my son/their kids to take up such a career is another story though. :D
 
Last edited:
From the NYT reports

- Mr T never made money from his own businesses and had countless bankruptcies/failures etc.
- Mr T squandered away $1 billion in the '90s
- Mr T made a ton of money by selling his name and from businesses that do not belong to him
- Mr T ploughed that profit into his failing businesses or buying new ones which are also losing money
- None of Mr T's properties actually belong to him yet as he has large loans on all of them or owns a share only.
- Mr T is personally liable for $421 million in loans becoming due in the next few years. (No way that he has that kind of cash on hand)

Overall however, fair play to him. He played the system pretty well to keep his image as a successful businessman while being nothing even close to that. He has perfected though the snakeoil salesmanship, hence, he is indeed good at something, even when it is just goldplated stuff he's got everywhere on his properties.

It is a way of life, I guess. Whether I or others will want to teach my son/their kids to take up such a career is another story though. :D

He did teach Eric how to start a foundation for kids with cancer and then take all the money they raised and siphon it out to themselves.

it’s been shut down.
 
He did teach Eric how to start a foundation for kids with cancer and then take all the money they raised and siphon it out to themselves.

it’s been shut down.

Yep, that is the Mr T way of life - siphon money from others and cheat your way through life.

After all, he did it to his contractors, banks, American taxpayers, his niece, business partners, city council.....list by far not complete.

What baffles me most though, is that roughly 40% of US voters think he is the new messiah and would follow him blindly into the abyss. :rolleyes:
 
I notice that the Hillary deleted Emails are about to be released prior to the election. Not that it is easy to find on MSM unless you type specifics as is usually the case.
Clinton foundation,Africa,Saudi Arabia,China,Russia,Benghazi, CIA assets,Crimes against humanity, threats,blackmail,bribes.
I guess that Trump waited a long time to use his Presidential powers regarding Hillary.
 
I notice that the Hillary deleted Emails are about to be released prior to the election. Not that it is easy to find on MSM unless you type specifics as is usually the case.
Clinton foundation,Africa,Saudi Arabia,China,Russia,Benghazi, CIA assets,Crimes against humanity, threats,blackmail,bribes.
I guess that Trump waited a long time to use his Presidential powers regarding Hillary.

Who cares? Biden is the candidate...not Hillary. But guess that's one kind of entertainment for Trumpsters :P
 
This is my thought exactly, what has he done for America? How has he made America great again? How is his wall building going? Can one of the Trumpites tell me anything he has done to make America great again since he was elected?
Thought I would bump this a bit as I can't see a single reply to it/ So is nobody wanting to tell me what Mr T has done in almost 4 years to MAGA?????
 
I would not be surprised to see Trump take the opportunity to use his platform to do a live presentation with his utterly beautiful press sec to introduce the American public to those emails just to circumvent the 95% media bias he had in his last compaign and the even more during this one.
And Hillary has backed a horse in this campaign to the hilt which would see her into a very powerful position.
 
Last edited:
Thought I would bump this a bit as I can't see a single reply to it/ So is nobody wanting to tell me what Mr T has done in almost 4 years to MAGA?????
Does anyone with a reasoned thought process think that a president of the USA thinks that they have done nothing at all to make his Country better? There is a list if you cared to look as a bipartisan onlooker
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top