North Korea and US politics

[ladyhawke]

He would have sent a team of chilli plant specialists like the world has never seen before to inject my decimated plant with bleech to make it live again.

That is one of the sharpest, funniest and topical replies I have ever seen.

Well played, Ben. Well played.

 

[Playford7]

Mussolini AKA Mr T liking his balcony moments!

View attachment 143855

He does look rather majestic I agree.

Great appointment by the lord emperor, she’s a smart, pretty and strong women.

Great move IMO

 

[pinnit2014]

He does look rather majestic I agree.

Great appointment by the lord emperor, she’s a smart, pretty and strong women.

Great move IMO

Looks better than Michael Jackson on a balcony; Jackson was holding a baby that time, Trumps holding the dreams of many

 

[Harry_BKK]

He does look rather majestic I agree.

Great appointment by the lord emperor, she’s a smart, pretty and strong women.

Great move IMO

You do know that she's not there because of her achievements/accolades?

If you can spare a few minutes, this might help you to see through the charade and why I asked you the above question.

BTW, Whitehouse is an ex-state attorney general, so I would assume he knows a thing or two about the matter at hand. I hope you have the patience to make it to 08:35 as that is were the main part starts.

 

[Playford7]

You do know that she's not there because of her achievements/accolades?

If you can spare a few minutes, this might help you to see through the charade and why I ask you the above question.

I’m just on route to make work great again harry, will catch up tonight when I’m home.

 

[Kroffe]

 

[Harry_BKK]

He does look rather majestic I agree.

Great appointment by the lord emperor, she’s a smart, pretty and strong women.

Great move IMO

And here her resume. That is as if you give a first-year medical student a full degree.

I'm not doubting her intellect, just her qualifications to be a Supreme Court justice.

Does that look qualified for you?

 

[Kroffe]

And here her resume. That is as if you give a first-year medical student a full degree.

I'm not doubting her intellect, just her qualifications to be a Supreme Court justice.

Does that look qualified for you?

View attachment 143860

This is a small step for man, but a giant leap backwards for womens rights.
Atleast if they do the things they say they will be doing.
Crazy.

 

[Harry_BKK]

This is a small step for man, but a giant leap backwards for womens rights.
Atleast if they do the things they say they will be doing.
Crazy.

Fully agree.

Don't know if you did but if you watched the entire video, it is clear that they are gearing up for exactly that.

About 20 minutes in he tells the fact that in 80 sensitive cases before the SC in the last years it was always a 5:4 verdict and the record is 80:0. That makes it very clear what a 6:3 majority will do.

 

[Kroffe]

Fully agree.

Don't know if you did but if you watched the entire video, it is clear that they are gearing up for exactly that.

About 20 minutes in he tells the fact that in 80 sensitive cases before the SC in the last years it was always a 5:4 verdict and the record is 80:0. That makes it very clear what a 6:3 majority will do.

Its messed up.
Sad times for homosexuals and women if they go thru with their plans.

Wonder if they got their inspiration from the Talibans.

 

[Kroffe]

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

"They just bent over backwards to ram a judge through, ignoring that people need covid relief, then went on vacation?"

Classy move.

 

[Kroffe]

But thats quite enough politics for one day.
Lets see what they are doing in Canada.

" Canadian cyclist rode 101km in 7 hours to draw a moose on map in downtown Toronto. "

 

[mack341]

And here her resume. That is as if you give a first-year medical student a full degree.

I'm not doubting her intellect, just her qualifications to be a Supreme Court justice.

Does that look qualified for you?

Not knowing the exact ins and outs, but she has quite a few children so maybe prioritised that ?
I hope she does a good job and helps americans retain their constitutional rights [not just guns]

 

[Playford7]

This is a small step for man, but a giant leap backwards for womens rights.
Atleast if they do the things they say they will be doing.
Crazy.

What things? Just on quick 30 min lunch break.

 

[Kroffe]

What things? Just on quick 30 min lunch break.

They are talking about overturning Roe v Wade, which if im not mistaken is basically what gives women in the US right to have an abortion.
If they get rid of that, its not that far fetched to think they want to make it illegal.
They are not too keen on same sex marriage either.

Just a big step backwards for human rights basically.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

" Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973),

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

was a

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

of the

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

in which the Court ruled that the

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

protects a pregnant woman's liberty to choose to have an

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

without excessive government restriction. It struck down many U.S. state and federal

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

"

Some states wont be pleasent for women to live in if it gets overturned.

 

[Kroffe]

Im have really not read up about it enough to know exactly what overturning that decision would mean.
So just for this once, dont take my words as gospel.

 

[Harry_BKK]

What things? Just on quick 30 min lunch break.

The video has it all explained

 

[Harry_BKK]

Not knowing the exact ins and outs, but she has quite a few children so maybe prioritised that ?
I hope she does a good job and helps americans retain their constitutional rights [not just guns]

How unsurprising. You simply can't bring yourself to say anything negative about anything related to the Dear Leader. But you always got some sort of excuse.

So by your logic, a 1st-year medical student should be given a full degree just because she raised a few kids first, no need to finish her studies

Maybe a better example. She finished her studies but had only a few years experience in a hospital and now is promoted to perform the most complex heart or brain surgeries. Never had the time to get the extra training because she "prioritized" raising the kids. Would you simply put yourself on the operating table knowing that?

 

[Kroffe]

The video has it all explained

No no, my 3 sentence explanation explains it better than the 20 minute video.
I have a way with words.

 

[pinnit2014]

Harry seems very triggerable these days

 

[TheAddict]

Timing looks ripe. I'll take a cheap shot ;p

 

[mack341]

How unsurprising. You simply can't bring yourself to say anything negative about anything related to the Dear Leader. But you always got some sort of excuse.

So by your logic, a 1st-year medical student should be given a full degree just because she raised a few kids first, no need to finish her studies

Maybe a better example. She finished her studies but had only a few years experience in a hospital and now is promoted to perform the most complex heart or brain surgeries. Never had the time to get the extra training because she "prioritized" raising the kids. Would you simply put yourself on the operating table knowing that?

She is going to be working/discussing each case with other expert/experienced surgeons to borrow your example. Remember due to liberal PC politics Trump had to choose a woman, which must have narrowed the field, and so if he decided to choose the one with the best intellect rather than experience, I don't see that as a bad thing in the situation given the subject is law.

Have you looked at every other SC judge, their background? Because looking at Elena Kagan's wikipedia it states:

On January 5, 2009, President-elect Barack Obama announced he would nominate Kagan to be Solicitor General. At the time of her nomination, Kagan had never argued a case before any court.

... On May 10, 2010, Obama nominated Kagan to the Supreme Court

 

[Harry_BKK]

She is going to be working/discussing each case with other expert/experienced surgeons to borrow your example, remember due to liberal PC politics Trump had to choose a woman which must have narrowed the field, and so if he decided to choose the one with the best intellect rather than experience I don't see that as a bad thing in the situation given the subject is law.

Have you looked at every other SC judge, their background? Because looking at Elena Kagan's wikipedia it states:

On January 5, 2009, President-elect Barack Obama announced he would nominate Kagan to be Solicitor General. At the time of her nomination, Kagan had never argued a case before any court.

... On May 10, 2010, Obama nominated Kagan to the Supreme Court

Two wrongs make one right?

Your whataboutism starts to reall suck mack.

As for Mr T, trust me when I say this, he did not chose her!

Go on, we can do this all day!

 

[vorcirion]

She is going to be working/discussing each case with other expert/experienced surgeons to borrow your example. Remember due to liberal PC politics Trump had to choose a woman, which must have narrowed the field, and so if he decided to choose the one with the best intellect rather than experience, I don't see that as a bad thing in the situation given the subject is law.

Have you looked at every other SC judge, their background? Because looking at Elena Kagan's wikipedia it states:

On January 5, 2009, President-elect Barack Obama announced he would nominate Kagan to be Solicitor General. At the time of her nomination, Kagan had never argued a case before any court.

... On May 10, 2010, Obama nominated Kagan to the Supreme Court

Trump didn't need to choose a woman. He could've chosen Playford as the next supreme court justice and republicans would've confirmed him.
Pretty sure only criterias were a) really conservative and b) young enough.

 

[mack341]

Two wrongs make one right?

Your whataboutism starts to reall suck mack.

As for Mr T, trust me when I say this, he did not chose her!

In law it would be called a precedent Harry.





Edit: In any case I sense you do it all the time yourself if anyone dare criticise Biden/democrats, most people accept its part of any political discussion. I am sure if I brought up the clinton's tax avoidance you'd reply 'look at trump!'?