New Policy Change Procedure

"Slots of Vegas.com is a Slots Portal of the Prism Casino Group. If you already have the Prism Account please do not download again!"

That has been on the download page of the Slots of Vegas web site since the casino was created. It is directly below the spot you need to enter your info to be allowed to download

This is true, but why have different "Portals" when players can only play at one, it can only help to confuse players, especially when they hear about these portals from your "spammy affiliates" who are interested only in getting the victim to click through and download.
Surely all the games in "slots of vegas" are also available in the main Prism casino. This is probably what caused the earlier problem of the player signing up at Slots of Vegas and being told their winnings were voided due to breaching the Prism terms and conditions. They will have seen the warning, but if they did not have a Prism account would have downloaded the casino, and expected the terms on the portal to apply to them without needing to look for the Prism terms.

While the number of complaints was small, it is the nature, not the number, that really counts. The fact that issues are resolved is not relevant if it took going to Casinomeister to get anyone to see sense. A good casino would resolve a problem straight away, rather than allow it to ferment, hoping the issue will go away.
Large numbers of players cannot see any logic in terms where you would refuse to pay a Finnish player for doing exactly the same thing as an American player. As far as they are concerned, they have been branded "second class" based on where they live. Because such country bans are in a special section of the terms, the large number of American players who have failed to read the terms are not affected because the terms just don't apply. I bet if a term banning American and Canadian players from bonuses was slipped in without notice, and new players left to find out themselves by reading the T & C (which they should, but many don't), there would be a massive number of complaints from players who have "never had trouble before" with online casinos.
Clever players who KNOW why Finnish players are banned will be finding ever more inventive ways of beating the casino, and some will be succeeding.
 
I was about to go play here until I saw you guys are part of the prism group. I threw my money down a hole instead, at least then I don't have to wonder if I will receive anything back.
 
Quote:
mrracetrack: "I put this into Google... Prism Casino+Complaints... here is the result:

Results 1 - 20 of about 41,400 for Prism Casino+Complaints."

I was actually referring to what casinomeister stated as the reasons for being re-rogued...


Quote:
casinomesiter.com: "During their sixth month probation period, there were no less than 56 complaints submitted via the Pitch a Bitch section."
https://www.casinomeister.com/rogue-casinos/

I posted what showed up on Google... I made no comments or remarks pertaining to that stat... other than it shows a LOT more than 56 complaints. People can take from that statistic whatever they choose.

Quote:
mrracetrack: "So when I see yet another "Virtual manager/spokesperson" (and there have been a few previously) come to a forum and start to "defend" the ethics and reputation of a Virtual casino... I feel it's appropriate to continue to make people aware of the "less than stellar" reputation and history this group has deservedly earned over the years."

That is a wonderful sentiment and I am sure that a lot of people will be happy to hear that you are looking out for their best interests. Unfortunately, your comments are all very vague...

Well Chris... I'm sure that having YOU looking out for peoples best interest will be quite reassuring to everyone... :rolleyes:

What comments were vague?? :what:

The previous managers/spokespersons?

Virtual Ted posted on here... and on the forum I am a moderator on.

Ted at least appeared to try to honestly answer questions and accusations. He took the "heat" rather well, IMO. Unfortunately... he no longer works for Virtual... and I believe he mentioned he was stiffed out of his final paycheck... :eek: How surprising... :rolleyes:

Virtual Danny also was given the opportunity to state his thoughts and defend Virtual... on both the Sucks and the OPU forums... and got his feelings hurt... and couldn't stand the heat... and scurried off with his tail between his legs... never to be heard from again... :eek: (except for the "Virtual Danny Spam" he continued to send to everyone)... :rolleyes:

He sure didn't do much for the reputation of the Virtual Casino group... other than add to the negative views most people already held about them.

Were you referring to my comment about the "less than steller" reputation?

Anyone who does a search on ANY of the major gambling forums (including here on Casinomeister) about Virtual Casinos... and especially PRISM... will find thread after thread of NEGATIVE posts concerning these casinos... and that is a FACT... not some "vague" comments on my part.


We ALWAYS PAY whether there have been delays in the past or not. And, if we don't, there is a reason; either the player broke casino rules or was fraudulent. Those are the only reasons we wouldn't pay a player.

No... you DON'T "always pay"... you invoke what you stated above... claims of "the player broke casino rules or was fraudulent" which has been the standard "catch phrase" you invoked FAR too many times... and is exactly what the Virtual group and PRISM are infamous for.

Now you come on here claiming that you will post any and all "T&C changes"... and be accessable to players to deal with any "problems"...

Well... that's great, Chris... :rolleyes:

You want everyone to just "forgive and forget" all past injustices... and give you and your casinos a "fresh start" now... :rolleyes:

The old adage "Actions speak louder than words" seems more appropriate here.

We don't need you to "tell" us how great things are going to be with your casinos... we need to "see" it.

All these types of "promises" have been made numerous times by the Virtual group in the past... and were continually "broken" numerous times.

I give you credit, Chris... you are trying to do your job to the best of your ability... and your attempts at "spin doctoring" all the negative things posted about your casinos is commendable... but as I stated above...

"Actions speak louder than words"... :)
 
"Virtual Danny also was given the opportunity to state his thoughts and defend Virtual... on both the Sucks and the OPU forums... and got his feelings hurt... and couldn't stand the heat... and scurried off with his tail between his legs... never to be heard from again... (except for the "Virtual Danny Spam" he continued to send to everyone)... "


I had to email virtual danny to get him to stop. Maybe he will, lol

ok
Danny

VirtualDanny.com
Part of The Virtual Casino Group TODAY
1 866 968 7946
Danny@VirtualDanny.com

Working Hours
Noon to Midnight EST Monday to Saturday

The Virtual Casino Group TODAY
TheVirtualCasino.com
CrystalClubCasino.com
VegasStripCasino.com
Spin2WinCasino.com
WinItCasino.com
Second to None Separate to Themselves United as One

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
- Take a Tour
Click on ALL 16 Links to the left

----- Original Message -----
From:
To: Danny
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: stop the emails



----- Original Message -----
From: Danny
To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: stop the emails


Hi

Sorry to bother you. I cant find you on my list. I think I already took you off. What the email address? I'll forward it to support to take you off their list
Danny

VirtualDanny.com
Part of The Virtual Casino Group TODAY
1 866 968 7946
Danny@VirtualDanny.com

Working Hours
Noon to Midnight EST Monday to Saturday

The Virtual Casino Group TODAY
TheVirtualCasino.com
CrystalClubCasino.com
VegasStripCasino.com
Spin2WinCasino.com
WinItCasino.com
Second to None Separate to Themselves United as One

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
- Take a Tour
Click on ALL 16 Links to the left

----- Original Message -----
From:
To: Danny@VirtualDanny.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 1:23 PM
Subject: stop the emails


stop the emails
 
jinnia: "My question is, "how many times does it take for a casino, group of casinos say they have cleaned up their act, and webmasters gives them yet, another chance, to only have it thrown right back in their faces? How many times right here at Casinomeisters??"

You stated in this same post, not only that this problem was back in 2003, but also that it was resolved. I am here to make sure that current problems are taken care of and that players are treated fairly... NOW. There is nothing that I can do for you now if you had problems with one of our casinos in the past, and you said yourself that we resolved the issue for you a couple of years ago. So, to say that we are throwing it back in the faces of players, when we have actually worked to resolve all issues, no matter how dated, does not seem fair to me. What else can we do?
Yes, my problem was in 2003, yes two years later Amit paid. BUT, my statement of, ""how many times does it take for a casino, group of casinos say they have cleaned up their act, and webmasters gives them yet, another chance, to only have it thrown right back in their faces?" has nothing to do with that, it has to do with, Virtual/Prism gets rogued, a representative for them strolls in and says they've cleaned up their act, and six months later the complaints start rolling in, again! They get rogued, in strolls yet 'another' representative for them. That is what my statement is about. It has happened time after time, with the exact same results....rogued again, due to same ol' behaviour.

I wonder if a quick search will show very recent complaints?
 
jinnia:
Yes, my problem was in 2003, yes two years later Amit paid.

In order to get Jinnia paid TWO YEARS later it took a series of phone calls directly to Amit.
If I remember correctly, Amit denied that Prism was part of Virtual.
BUT, since he didn't want any negative PR he said he would pay it anyway.
Then, when the funds were supposed to be in Jinnia's account... it didn't show.
More phone calls and more excuses why it wasn't there yet.
FINALLY, the funds showed up in her account.

Now, my questions to the world are:
1. Why would someone pay an outstanding debt from a casino that wasn't part of your group?
2. Possibly he was mistaken?
3. Maybe we should all send our outstanding payments to Chris and have him ask Amit to pay them for us?

Sorry, Jinnia, I didn't mean to jump in on your band wagon but, I wanted to let the posters and Chrisy Boy here know how really difficult it was to get your money.

Also, like Mrracetrack said:
"Virtual Danny also was given the opportunity to state his thoughts and defend Virtual... on both the Sucks and the OPU forums... and got his feelings hurt... and couldn't stand the heat... and scurried off with his tail between his legs... never to be heard from again...and scurried off with his tail between his legs... never to be heard from again... " :oops:

VD was/is a sad excuse for a manager. I remember when he posted that his "feelings were hurt" by all the negative posts about him and Virtual.:eek:

I wonder if he went home crying to mommy.:D
 
Hi Chris,

I'm just catching up with the thread. Thanks for being communicative on changes concerning your casino bonuses. I don't mind making this information available, but I do have a point to make concerning the following statement:

I am not happy about the recent re-rouging of our casinos and I feel that it was totally unfair. On the other hand, maybe it was our fault. We have had a very hands off approach to the forums, and have felt that our involvement on the forums have never gone very well. The attacks on us as a group made it almost impossible for the real issues to be addressed.

56 complaints against our group was the reason supplied for our recent rouging. Do the math. 56 complaints, spread over 8 casinos, each as large as almost any casino you compare them with, is 7 complaints each too many, but definitely not enough for any casino to be rouged. Then, when you take into consideration how many of these complaints come from players with issues that were resolved, or have the same issue and have made complaints as a group against us, the problems with our casinos are minimal. Oh, and I don't want to leave out the players like the one above who have issues with us, coming from as far back as 3 years ago or longer, that are still attacking our credibility....
You do understand there are many casinos that generate 0-5 complaints per year that are the same size as yours. I sat down with your General Manager and two other interested parties last October, went over your business plan, and came to the agreement that complaints would cease with proper guidance and management. Over the course of several months there were no changes in the types of complaints or number submitted.

And this wasn't the first time we sat down together. I had a meeting with your owner a few years ago going over the same thing.

I get this all the time - especially from the Virtual Casino Group - "Oh, we're so huge, of course we're going to generate complaints." Bull shit. People complain to me when they have no other place to go. If a casino is properly managed, all complaints should be resolved by the casino operation itself. I should NEVER be approached by a player. Most well managed casinos understand this.

The Virtual casino group has always been problematic. Too many cowboy managers making stupid decisions. Your organization lacks professionalism. Keep in mind, players occasionally send me chat sessions or emails where managers display their amateuristic tendencies. Just yesterday, the manager for Virtual casino (Roger) referred to me as the "School Marm" in a chat session to a player. You show me a reputable business that condones or tolerates this sort of behavior from a manager - and I'll show you the Virtual Casino group.

As long as your organization keeps excusing itself for being so "big" that it generates complaints, you'll never take your casinos out of the perpetual tailspin that it's in. There needs to be serious changes made at Virtual - not just lip service that I and many others have received over the past several years.
 
[1] I sat down with your General Manager and two other interested parties last October, went over your business plan, and came to the agreement that complaints would cease with proper guidance and management. Over the course of several months there were no changes in the types of complaints or number submitted.

[2] And this wasn't the first time we sat down together. I had a meeting with your owner a few years ago going over the same thing.

[3] As long as your organization keeps excusing itself for being so "big" that it generates complaints, you'll never take your casinos out of the perpetual tailspin that it's in. There needs to be serious changes made at Virtual - not just lip service that I and many others have received over the past several years.
1 and 2 above is exactly what I speak of. Promises to change and do better, and that not happening, over and over again!
The only changes within the Virtual group are the changing of managers.

Number 3 above, AMEN!!!
 
Hi Chris,

...

As long as your organization keeps excusing itself for being so "big" that it generates complaints, you'll never take your casinos out of the perpetual tailspin that it's in. There needs to be serious changes made at Virtual - not just lip service that I and many others have received over the past several years.

Sorry X. There is a rogue element there that just is. You guys are sooo close to coming into the light.

How fexing hard would it be to pay every valid issue? How hard would it be to say, yes, we trust the arbitrator (CM) and we want to be trusted absolutely by any player anywhere, anytime.

I don't get it.You are either crooks or you are not.
 
Last edited:
Hello Everyone,

Chris again...

Bryan,

Thank you very much for your reply. Here are my opinions

Casinomeister: You do understand there are many casinos that generate 0-5 complaints per year that are the same size as yours. I sat down with your General Manager and two other interested parties last October, went over your business plan, and came to the agreement that complaints would cease with proper guidance and management. Over the course of several months there were no changes in the types of complaints or number submitted.

Explain to me how it is that our group is the only group that has to deal with players breaking casino rules and running to the forums. I cannot believe that. This issue with the Netherlands players could have happened to anyone. I also just had a group from Poland come in and redeem free chips with me at Prism. I had to deny over 40 withdrawals, all redeeming the same free chip, all on the same day, and Poland has been blocked from chips for 3years! I will not be surprised if at least 10 of those players go to the forums. Are you telling me that other casinos don't have these problems, or that they just blindly pay everyone, even free chip hunters, just to avoid bad publicity? That seems to me like a recipe for bankruptcy. The complaints that will be generated just from this one group, clearly breaking casino rules, will double what you state "many casinos" generate per year. What do we do? Forget about our rules and let cheaters run wild?

Casinomeister: I get this all the time - especially from the Virtual Casino Group - "Oh, we're so huge, of course we're going to generate complaints." Bull shit. People complain to me when they have no other place to go. If a casino is properly managed, all complaints should be resolved by the casino operation itself. I should NEVER be approached by a player. Most well managed casinos understand this.

That is exactly what I am saying! We would love to be able to deal with all of these issues ourselves. Unfortunately, there are always going to be these black marks against us. We are going to have to learn to deal with that. But, some of your forum members had used our "probation" as leverage to do whatever they want. You know how many times during those few months all of heard "I am going to casinomeister..." when we were explaining to them that they were clearly breaking casino rules? It is almost better that you rogue us... at least that nonsense has stopped. They used your forum as cover, and that is a fact. If they had not known that we were making serious efforts to clean up a bad rep on your site, they would not have had a leg to stand on. The majority of complaints you received were foolery and we both know it. The fact is, we are an honest and fair casino, with better payout percentages than most other casinos online, we always pay (if slowly at times... I do not dispute that), but we do not tolerate cheating or bonus abuse. That will never change. If you are looking for an angle, don't look here. We will catch you.

Casinomeister: The Virtual casino group has always been problematic. Too many cowboy managers making stupid decisions. Your organization lacks professionalism. Keep in mind, players occasionally send me chat sessions or emails where managers display their amateuristic tendencies.

You are absolutely right. Our management has been poor on a lot of levels. Managers have been given a lot of freedom, within their respective casinos, and some very bad choices have been made in the past. I believe my boss has admitted to this while speaking with you as well. A lot of that has changed, and managers are being held responsible for their actions now. He has discussed all of this with you and it is all true. But, the basic fundamental rule of "follow casino rules" has not changed. We will not back down and say, "Oh, you're going to casinomeister?? Wait... wait wait... We'll pay you!!!," when players have clearly disregarded the rules of the casino and used methods specifically listed as not allowed in the terms and conditions of each of our casinos.

Casinomeister: Just yesterday, the manager for Virtual casino (Roger) referred to me as the "School Marm" in a chat session to a player. You show me a reputable business that condones or tolerates this sort of behavior from a manager - and I'll show you the Virtual Casino group.

I wouldn't say that that was unprofessional, Bryan. I can understand why you don't like the opinion, but that is what it is... just an opinion. We are all getting sick of hearing, "I'm going to casinomeister," every time we ask for docs, explain rules, check playthrough, or do anything that a players feels unhappy about. We are running a business and being fair. That "bull shit" is getting tiresome.

We are in gaming, Bryan. We are not a customer service center for IBM or Coca Cola. This is a different type of business with a different type of customer. If I pasted some of things you say to clients, and then was to compare you with a customer service representive from a so-called "reputable business," I think you would find that professionalism is not only a matter of opinion, but varies greatly on the business that you are in. This business is not for the Mary Poppins' of the world... this is gambling! This business was built by people interested in having fun and is kept alive by the same type of people. The don't want professional... they want entertainment. We give it to them, as do you.

Casinomeister: As long as your organization keeps excusing itself for being so "big" that it generates complaints, you'll never take your casinos out of the perpetual tailspin that it's in. There needs to be serious changes made at Virtual - not just lip service that I and many others have received over the past several years.

We made an effort to get off that "rogue" list and it was a mistake. A lot of your members treated it as a weakness and milked it for everything it was worth. I have a propostion for you... next time you want to put someone on probation, DON'T ANNOUNCE IT. I'll bet you wouldn't have gotten 10% of the complaints you did if players didn't know they could hurt us with them. I think these threads have shown that there are some people holding some nasty grudges (from years ago), and even more just trying to get over. We didn't have a chance before it even started.

Oh and we are growing, Bryan. The tailspin you are referring to either doesnt exist or it has had some backwards results. So you know, for every complaint you have received, we have over 500 active, satisfied, depositors in Prism alone. We just wanted to get our names off that list. We dont deserve to be there. But, you can trust that it has more to do with pride than business. Business is good.

jinnia: Promises to change and do better, and that not happening, over and over again!
The only changes within the Virtual group are the changing of managers.

When was the last time you played at any of our casinos? Is there an issue that is unresolved for you? I would love to help you now if there is.

lojo: I don't get it.You are either crooks or you are not.

Not. You know that.


Well, I will continue to post any changes or updates on this site. I appreciate everyones input and I encourage all of you to let me know directly if there is ever anything that I can help you with. Like Bryan said, we should be resolving these issues with each other, not through him. I am not going to keep re-hashing old issues though. Nothing can be accomplished by doing that.

If any of you would like to contact me, my email is...
chris@viploungecasino.com
chris@prismcasino.com

I created this post to let you all know I will be posting all policy changes here. I have accomplished that. Contact me directly if there is anything else that I can help you with.

Sincerely,

Christopher DiAngelo
Casino Manager
 
I don't see why you want to post all your policy updates here. You are rogue. What's the point in posting?

These posts of yours can't be helping your reputation any.

And here's some advice: If your rules disallow Polish players from redeeming free chips, then don't allow Polish players to redeem them. Why wait until they are trying to withdraw?
 
What the fek??

I have to give it to you Chris, you are not only meeting player issues in real time, you are standing right in the face of everything thrown at you. I'm not privy, nor do I care about, your Group's failed negotiations with Bryan, I only concern myself with a fair game. And you, as a manager, have never failed me. Nor will you, if you can help it.

Bryan has been away on business, and so has the other moderator here afaik, so lets hope this thread doesn't go volitile in their absence.

You went overboard. I'll ask you to respect the Maker of this forum, and all the participants here. If we haven't 'policed' ourselves well enough, I'll thank you for bringing it to our attentions.

There are 'rogue' players here, no doubt. Personally, I am more comfortable calling 'the other side' out than I am a player. But that stops now, for me.

Again, at the moment, Bryan may not be here in real time, but if nobody else noticed I defended POC andre rossi per PAB. One from four years ago, one possible issue, one that may have been miscoded to relate to an actual ROGUE CASINO. Palace of chance has had one issue in six months? (no disrespect mystic I am not counting yours because i don't see it in the pitched bitches)

Your verbosity, Chris, may be a good thing in the end and it may not. I appreciate it. As far as I'm concerned I'll risk every bit of my reputation here to have a casino manager come on line and deal with Gaming.
 
Hey Chris,

Talk about a "Spin Doctor"... :rolleyes:

You've got "all the answers" down pat... :lolup:

Look at this, Chris:



The Following 22 Users Say Thank You to Casinomeister For This Useful Post:
3Dice (1st May 2007), catrina m (30th April 2007), Da_Gambla (30th April 2007), frufrugirl (30th April 2007), jenn1381 (Yesterday), jinnia (1st May 2007), jod5413 (1st May 2007), lanidar (30th April 2007), liquidsoap (Yesterday), lnspin (1st May 2007), me_and_ed (1st May 2007), Mousey (30th April 2007), mrracetrack (30th April 2007), NASHVEGAS (30th April 2007), oldtrvlagt (1st May 2007), Robertsgirl (30th April 2007), soflat (30th April 2007), spearmaster (Yesterday), tennis_balls (30th April 2007), unicorn40 (30th April 2007), winbig (1st May 2007), Zoozie (1st May 2007)


All these people indicated that they felt the Casinomeister was "Spot On" with what he posted.

And lets look at what "your" posts received, Chris... ;)



Yup... "nada"... :rolleyes: speaks volumes... doesn't it... :thumbsup:

You can't seem to "get it", Chris... that just because you say that you and your casinos are "fair... wonderful... always pay everyone... hardly get any complaints... only from cheats & frauds & rulebreakers... and blah... blah... blah..." doesn't mean it is fact... It is "your opinion" only.

And one that is not shared by many people.
 
I respect you, Mister Race Track, but in my limited knowledge, and going from the gut, your input on virtual is on the edge of the likes of cyprean and lanidir.

I know it's a pain in the ass, and the current management can't help, but what was your personal bitch? Please state it loud and clear in a hundered words or less.

Cyprean, i think, with my limited knowledge that you are an exploiter.

L, come clean, what is your personal bitch? Please state it in regular sized letters in the color black if you can.

This is complete and utter bullshit and I'm about to bow out.
 
I respect you, Mister Race Track, but in my limited knowledge, and going from the gut, your input on virtual is on the edge of the likes of cyprean and lanidir.

That is a fair observation, lojo.

I have always been known for stating my thoughts in a very blunt and "no holds barred" manner.


I know it's a pain in the ass, and the current management can't help, but what was your personal bitch? Please state it loud and clear in a hundered words or less.

I have stated it "loud and clear"... as I do with most things I post. ;)

I have been 'involved" with online gaming for close to 7 years now. During that period... I have read and followed the numerous complaints made about Virtual Casinos (of which Prism is part of) and have had direct dealings with a few people that were screwed over by Virtual and Prism... these are honest people whom I trust and respect... and have no doubts whatsoever that what they told me about their experiences with Virtual and Prism were factual and true... and they all were screwed over by Virtual and Prism.

I personally had an incident with Prism that I felt was "resolved" in an unsatisfactory manner. All I'll say about that incident is... I was unable to collect winnings I was entitled to... which was $100.


Cyprean, i think, with my limited knowledge that you are an exploiter.

L, come clean, what is your personal bitch? Please state it in regular sized letters in the color black if you can.

lojo... As LANIDAR is a personal friend of mine... and he certainly can defend his actions... I'm sure he won't mind me responding to your question... he has made his "personal bitch" quite clear regarding Virtual and Prism... both here on Casinomeister... and numerous other forums. Go do a search of "LANIDAR" on Google... you'll find all you want to know about his beefs with Prism & Virtual.

This is complete and utter bullshit and I'm about to bow out.

lojo...Can you be a bit more specific about exactly what "complete and utter bullshit" you are referring to? :rolleyes:
 
Lojo, I think you're backing a losing horse here - please check out the numerous complaints archived on the Virtual group here and on just about every other online gambling portal of note on the Internet.

The Casinomeister response to this latest manager from the group was well considered and accurate in my opinion, and the time is past due for them to match their assurances with sustained and professional online casino management practice rather than pretty words posted periodically on the fora.
 
I'm not seeing any current complaints with prism or slots of vegas that aren't being dealt with in real time. As far as I can see palace of chance has had one PAB in the last six months.

The complete and utter bullshit comment didn't relate to your post, it relates to the situation.

If exploiters are abusing the casinos they should be called out here as well as the casinos are called out for abusing players.

This should be a forum where each side can state their point without fear of censure or browbeating. It really seems to be 1000/1 when the feeding frenzies happen.

I think that a power that once was, (we the players, not the arbitors nor advocates) has been co-opted by the occasional swarm and the residual resenters.

I'm tired Bro, so have to fade for now.
Peace and good fortunes:thumbsup:
*********

Cyprean, you can PM me if you wish before responding. i could be mistaken.

Complete and utter bullshit. I just want to play, i don't need to be involved in this shit. Where are the other denizens? Why don't you stand up in other threads? This isn't a place to just bitch and moan and whine. If it isn't a forum equally available to casino and player, regardless of status, i think I'll bow out. If you won't call out your peers, you have no business participating in threads that discredit casinos.

Also to all, read my posts of the last five days, I'm not taking it easy on anybody.

tired tired sleep now :)
 
Lojo, I think you're backing a losing horse here - please check out the numerous complaints archived on the Virtual group here and on just about every other online gambling portal of note on the Internet.

The Casinomeister response to this latest manager from the group was well considered and accurate in my opinion, and the time is past due for them to match their assurances with sustained and professional online casino management practice rather than pretty words posted periodically on the fora.

I'm okay with that. I'm just advocating free speech and an open forum. So what if I play the fool? Nobody rond'cheer paying my rent nor buying my baby diamonds:D I'm just a voice in the wilderness.

But I do appreciate your concern, you're like a legend and stuff:notworthy :notworthy :notworthy
 
I don't think many would dispute that "balance" has consistently been a characteristic of this forum, oftentimes leading to accusations of being partisan by one side or the other (which in itself suggests that the place has it just about right LOL!)

Long may that continue imo.

There's good and bad in both camps; in this case Virtual is not well placed on past performance to be regarded as the former, I'm afraid.
 
jinnia: Promises to change and do better, and that not happening, over and over again!
The only changes within the Virtual group are the changing of managers.
When was the last time you played at any of our casinos? Is there an issue that is unresolved for you? I would love to help you now if there is.
As for the financial part, Amit took care of that. As for the extreme stress Prism Casino caused, that will never be made right. As time went along, the stress level eased, but not without leaving some physical issues, and that can't be resolved by Prism.

The last time I played at one of your casinos, about 2 - 3 weeks ago....I took you up on the free $75 at VIP Lounge, to see how things would go with the play (about 4 or 5 hours), and was hoping to cash out a little to see how that went, but that didn't happen. I did register as an affiliate, but haven't, and won't promote you. Ask me why I registered, and all I will say is, "I had my reason(s), but decided it wasn't worth the risk of sending yet another victim to Virtual/Prism/Grafix.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top