I am playing a lot of bj in various software platform, namely Boss, RTG and MG.
I find Boss and RTG is normal although it could be very streaky but that's gambling/variance.
However for MG's bj, while I believe they do deal a fair game in flat-betting (I have been up and down quite a bit in autoplay), abnormal hands do happens when I am incresing my bet in a recorvery series.
In my opinion, MG's bj do have a strategy to penalty those who use short of negative progression (don't put me wrong, I am not saying I can win by negative progression but I have never be able to win using a mild negative progression but for RTG and BOSS, sometimes it works but sometimes it not.) For example, deal second could be employed whenever the software detects
1. the last hands is a loss for player
2. the currcent bet size is = or > the last bet.
In this way, the dealer can secure a win for the players while others using flat-betting still find the game fair.
This is what I am experiencing for months: whenever (100%) I have higher bets, the win/loss ratio decrease dramatically to at least 1:3.
Anyone has similar experience?
Anyone can suggest how to test whether the software is performing something like that?
I find Boss and RTG is normal although it could be very streaky but that's gambling/variance.
However for MG's bj, while I believe they do deal a fair game in flat-betting (I have been up and down quite a bit in autoplay), abnormal hands do happens when I am incresing my bet in a recorvery series.
In my opinion, MG's bj do have a strategy to penalty those who use short of negative progression (don't put me wrong, I am not saying I can win by negative progression but I have never be able to win using a mild negative progression but for RTG and BOSS, sometimes it works but sometimes it not.) For example, deal second could be employed whenever the software detects
1. the last hands is a loss for player
2. the currcent bet size is = or > the last bet.
In this way, the dealer can secure a win for the players while others using flat-betting still find the game fair.
This is what I am experiencing for months: whenever (100%) I have higher bets, the win/loss ratio decrease dramatically to at least 1:3.
Anyone has similar experience?
Anyone can suggest how to test whether the software is performing something like that?