Please note that all games share the same mechanism which determines the jackpot win. Thus, with card games, the probability of hitting the jackpot combination is not natural but controlled by this shared random mechanism in the same way as slot machines' wins.
I'm relooking at this and I don't see where the casino is at fault with this statement. It's pretty obvious that all games are "Slots". Perhaps it's the term "cardgames" that sould be addressed since I believe it's an issue of symantics. Cardgames = appearance of cards vs description of play.
In addition to our slot machines, we offer four great card games:
You may try your luck at the Jacks Or Better, the classic video poker game. Our pay table for this game is the highest and most generous in the industry; you do not need to place a maximum bet to get a bonus pay out on the Royal Flush (although a maximum bet with a Royal Flush WILL win the jackpot!).
Maybe instead of yelling CROOKS! THIEVES!! someone can offer a serious suggestion on rewording their descriptions.
Also on the fact that a player witnessed a jackpot combination on a line not played, well that's why they call it gambling. This has happened at Micro casinos as well. It was brought up in conversation not too long ago about a poster that had a winning combo on Lots o'loot, but had only played one line. Shit happens. It happened to me on a lesser extent while playing Fruits Fiesta; I had bet only $.25 (my last quarter) and had three sevens pop up on the top row. Boy, was I pissed! Since then I always bet max lines at everything.
And again Caruso, don't confuse me as an affiliate - and I don't feel it's necessary to start making your caustic postings again. You were warned in the past about this sort of behaviour. Please refrain from these sort of posts.
Further:
caruso said:
Rather than shaking heads, wagging fingers and patting yourselves of your backs when you catch some poor sucker like whatsisname in the Bellerock thread, look to your side of the street. That is where the problem lies. Cheating casinos like Slotland mean cheating players. You can't have it both ways. While casinos cheat players, players will gladly return the favour.
I'm the one, alongside Bellerock and Neteller, who busted this player out, so I am assuming this comment is directed at me.
There is no comparison to this issue with Slotland and the case of cynowoo who deliberatly tried to cheat. He blatantly lied to me and the rest of the Casinomeister community with his BS Bellerock attack here in the forum (amongst others). He had falsified government issued IDs and tried to pass them off as real. That is fraud, and a criminal offense in most jurisdictions. Slotland is guilty of perhaps having some ambiguous statements on their website - which is strictly subjective. They may be guilty of providing unclear ad-copy, but that's about all I'm afraid.
Finally, I don't see the "intent" to deceive any one here - and I don't think anyone is being deceived in the first place. I agree that the ad-copy could be revised since there are a number of well-read players that feel that it should. But I don't see this as being a crucifiable offense.