Sure, which is exactly why they and everyone else should read the Terms. IMO the Terms at _these_ casinos have been considerably improved since we started this debate insofar as the SE issue goes. As to other casino groups, like some you've mentioned earlier, I only comment to say that in some cases the problems with those groups is a lot bigger than clauses related to SE.
I hear what you're saying about your checkbox thingy, etc. Maybe adding that is a big deal, maybe it isn't. We simply don't know and I think it's a bit silly to pretend as if we do. But why just that checkbox/whatever, why not Term X and Term Y too? Why not put all the Terms there? Or why not just leave the Terms where they are and expect, as always, that they'll be read where they're supposed to be read.
If the Terms aren't clear or are otherwise lacking then that's a fine point to bring up, as has already been done. But I honestly don't see the point of spreading the Terms clauses around -- popups, checkboxes, or whatever -- if there is no
particularly compelling reason to do so.
I maintain Terms of our own and if you asked me to start messing about with some Terms in popups, etc I'd tell you it's on my ToDo list right after "Learn Portugese". Since I, for example, say what I need to say in "the Terms" -- in my case we're talking about the
Pitch-A-Bitch FAQ -- 1000 things would be a better use of my time and resources than spreading those around and making more work (and head-aches) for myself.
Especially since people should go to the FAQ in order to read the FAQ: fragmenting the FAQ around the site will cause far more confusion and hassle for everyone than it would be worth, IMHO.
One of the first principles of User Interface design is to focus the user's attention and not fragment the message you are trying to convey. I think the same applies here, more or less.
