- Joined
- May 8, 2018
- Location
- south east england
I would say the reason to appoint ginsburg is in a way buried in time; no doubt she had the legal qualifications/standing but also was a hardcore liberal. But to realise that she cannot be replaced by a man regardless if he has a sharper legal mind, it will have to be a woman -due to the tick box pc culture that has slipped in over time- is a bit of a sad state of affairs [I could get egg on my face here but I'm sure it will be a woman who replaces ginsburg]
edit: I missed the boat there, but thought I'd explain how I viewed it when I posted my comment.
edit: I missed the boat there, but thought I'd explain how I viewed it when I posted my comment.