Phoenician
Dormant account
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2004
- Location
- Australia
cipher,
So far this month you have a 9% player win on blackjack over 2800 hands , you are a pretty good blackjack player
i havent gone through your logs but if you had a bad session with larger bets then there must have been some sensational sessions with smaller bets to have a 9% player advantage.
i guess my point is - it is not necissarily conclusive to suggest the games are rigged based on one bad session considering the good sessions you have had.
for the record we have no control over the games outcome at all and our house advantage with all the volume we do is well and truely in line with expectations this month compared to last month compared to YTD . also our play for fun mode plays exactly the same as the play for real mode however overall our house advantage is higher on player for fun i would assume because people do things they wouldnt normally do.
To balance out bad results players also have had some very nice winning swings.
We do however take issues over the integrity of our software very seriously and we have done some tests ourselves as well as having the advantage of being able to look a few million hands of blackjack each month which are conducted for real money.
We do forward enquiries through to RTG if there are any issues of this nature particularly when there have been software upgrades. we have a huge investment in this industry and if we thought our software supplier was doing the wrong thing then we wouldnt be there. i feel as though the games do and are playing fair based on all the information i have at my disposal. i also would find it difficult to think that any of the true 3rd party software suppliers would manipulate the results of the games due to the fact that they all have staff and any single disgruntled employee would have exposed these suppliers by now i would think. and similarly if the operators could manipulate the results then the 3rd party providor would be very exposed if an operator had a falling out and changed software suppliers.
i could probably find 10 examples of players winning 15 hands out of 20 and post them here but i dont think that either would be a good example of expectations either
cheers
Dean
So far this month you have a 9% player win on blackjack over 2800 hands , you are a pretty good blackjack player
i havent gone through your logs but if you had a bad session with larger bets then there must have been some sensational sessions with smaller bets to have a 9% player advantage.
i guess my point is - it is not necissarily conclusive to suggest the games are rigged based on one bad session considering the good sessions you have had.
for the record we have no control over the games outcome at all and our house advantage with all the volume we do is well and truely in line with expectations this month compared to last month compared to YTD . also our play for fun mode plays exactly the same as the play for real mode however overall our house advantage is higher on player for fun i would assume because people do things they wouldnt normally do.
To balance out bad results players also have had some very nice winning swings.
We do however take issues over the integrity of our software very seriously and we have done some tests ourselves as well as having the advantage of being able to look a few million hands of blackjack each month which are conducted for real money.
We do forward enquiries through to RTG if there are any issues of this nature particularly when there have been software upgrades. we have a huge investment in this industry and if we thought our software supplier was doing the wrong thing then we wouldnt be there. i feel as though the games do and are playing fair based on all the information i have at my disposal. i also would find it difficult to think that any of the true 3rd party software suppliers would manipulate the results of the games due to the fact that they all have staff and any single disgruntled employee would have exposed these suppliers by now i would think. and similarly if the operators could manipulate the results then the 3rd party providor would be very exposed if an operator had a falling out and changed software suppliers.
i could probably find 10 examples of players winning 15 hands out of 20 and post them here but i dont think that either would be a good example of expectations either
cheers
Dean