summertime said:I do have a question: if all betting systems fail, then why is the WAG system worse? (I actually mean this as a serious question, okay?)
It's neither worse nor better, it's the same.
Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
All Games
Popular Bonus Filters
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Popular News Sections
About Us
summertime said:I do have a question: if all betting systems fail, then why is the WAG system worse? (I actually mean this as a serious question, okay?)
bethug said:jpm, any time any flat bettor want to go head to head with me, i am easy to be found.
summertime said:I did it. i put $50 in a the Phoenician. as usual, I'm winning - yay.




).Player bet is worse than banker bet becuase bank win more often than player.DeMango said:Gentlemen;
The closest thing to betting on flipping a coin would be Baccarat, and I would recommend betting Player. Both the Banker bet and even doing Pai Gow have a better win percentage but of course the Casino grabs that 5% commission!

hahacasino said:as long as you play, no matter win or lose, you'll always get a cash prize.
if you find a better deal, they pay you $10,000 for reward!
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


DeMango said:Okay lets get out the calculators, 200 bets at $10, $2000 action. Banker wins 101. Betting Banker gets you (101 * 10 * .95)-(99 * 10). I get 959.50-990 = -30.50 Betting Player gets you (99 * 10) - (101 * 10). I get 990 - 1010 = -20.00 I win by losing less! The whole point that has flown over everyones head is that the ev. of one event is not the same as the ev. of a series of events.
summertime said:Thank you for the comments. I kept going back to CON because I love the graphics, the guy's voice, the public tables, etc.
