Hello all - my field is advantage play and physics

[pompado]

Find this forum after google for Kim Larsen.
It should exist some topics here by him from the years 2005/2006.
I would like to read them to make up my mind if he is a load promotor who know nothing or a real gambler with skills.

Cheers

 

[swampwitch]

Find this forum after google for Kim Larsen.
It should exist some topics here by him from the years 2005/2006.
I would like to read them to make up my mind if he is a load promotor who know nothing or a real gambler with skills.

https://www.casinomeister.com/forums/threads/6949/

My friend, the only answers you will get from long-timers here is "Roulette strategies, in the end, do not work." However, I'm sure we'll get a few new signups and hardcore strategy wonks who will tell you that Larsen is a roulette god.

If you turn out to be a Larsen shill, I will personally hunt you down and make fun of your hair.

Oh, and welcome to Casinomeister.

 

[Nifty29]

There is NO way to consistently predict the outcome of a RANDOM event.

If there was, everyone would win the lotto every week, and make a loss.

If I had the money, I would open an online casino only allowing roulette players using systems.

 

[pompado]

Thanks for the welcome.

I try the link above, but is say i have no permission to access that page.
I also try to search for "Vegas Dude" and "Kim Larsen" and i get nothing.

Would be great if some one could show me how to find he's old topics.

Many Thanks

 

[miso]

Find this forum after google for Kim Larsen.
It should exist some topics here by him from the years 2005/2006.
I would like to read them to make up my mind if he is a load promotor who know nothing or a real gambler with skills.

Cheers

Welcome.
Mate, there is only one strategy. Quit when you`re winning and don`t chase your losses
Hope you find what you`re looking for, but you mentioned physics? Like physics applicable to actual landbased casino roulette wheel
Don`t want to make fun of anyone, but that Kim Larsen must be some kind of Rainman or indeed a load promotor.

 

[pompado]

True.
I know nothing is due and that each spin is a new one.

Physics is the only way.
Not many succeed, i would say 1 in 1000.

 

[skiny]

If your field was physics you'd understand that random events can't be predicted.

 

[pompado]

You can narrow down a wheel and rape it just glancing at it for a moment during the spin.
And you will know the high probability area where the ball will end up each spin.

This with out using any kind of device.

Well why does not every one play that way, you might ask.
First it takes a great deal of knowledge to segregate and measuring data when it boils down to physics.
It also take allot of tracking and many hours and sometimes days of observations, before you can attack a wheel.

Now when there is time for action we already have positive expectation and an edge will manifest over the house.

 

[dunover]

You can narrow down a wheel and rape it just glancing at it for a moment during the spin.
And you will know the high probability area where the ball will end up each spin.

This with out using any kind of device.

Well why does not every one play that way, you might ask.
First it takes a great deal of knowledge to segregate and measuring data when it boils down to physics.
It also take allot of tracking and many hours and sometimes days of observations, before you can attack a wheel.

Now when there is time for action we already have positive expectation and an edge will manifest over the house.

PLEASE come quickly to my casino! Bring lots of cash with you, all drinks will be provided as will snacks and accommodation. My limousine will pick you up from the airport.

 

[pompado]

-

That was silly.

I deal with knowledge that never see daylight and i am not alone.
Bias and Visual ballistics is the only solution to get an edge over the house.

All the rest has negative expectation and are based upon gamblers fallacy.

 

[dunover]

-

That was silly.

I deal with knowledge that never see daylight and i am not alone.
Bias and Visual ballistics is the only solution to get an edge over the house.

All the rest has negative expectation and are based upon gamblers fallacy.

No, I think YOU are suffering gamblers fallacy.
Roulette has been around hundreds of years. Every system, trick, theory and plot has been tried. The wheel still wins.

Come back and let us know when you are a millionaire, and show us the proof.

We collectively have centuries of gambling experience between us on here. Therefore please excuse our cynicism, and please understand why you have not been inundated with PM's and requests for your 'system'.

Instead of trying to flog your theories here, should you not be on the wheel, making your fortune?

 

[clees42]

No, I think YOU are suffering gamblers fallacy.
Roulette has been around hundreds of years. Every system, trick, theory and plot has been tried. The wheel still wins.

Not entirely true.
There were some students who created small computer that could calculate the most probable section of the wheel for the ball to stop at.
they had the chip hidden in a shoe.
The group was called Eudaemons.

 

[skiny]

I deal with knowledge that never see daylight

Black magic?

and i am not alone.

You joined a coven?

 

[rockycatt]

Not entirely true.
There were some students who created small computer that could calculate the most probable section of the wheel for the ball to stop at.
they had the chip hidden in a shoe.
The group was called Eudaemons.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[pompado]

-

Well i ignore the stupid comment and reply to does with some substance.

Yes it is true that roulette computers work, i have one, don't use it for real do.
I have a Huxley wheel with low frets at home and play for fun with the computer and experiment with different things.
But would not use the roulette computer in a real casino.
I know people who does and they do pretty good.

My self are only semi professional and don't play full time.
I have not made millions, even if i have positive expectation when i entering the game.
Up around 20K

I will not continue posting here as i can see that there is not much experience and knowledgeable people around.

 

[dionysus]

Well, with a poor attitude and a snide departure, I shan't think you'll be missed.

 

[Simmo!]

OK this has *shock horror* made me think

I've always been one of those who bang on about roulette being a game of chance and unbeatable. Which, all things being perfect, is true and I don't care what anyone says. However.... how many roulette wheels are *perfect*? I think it's safe to say a picture of one (ie: an online casino!) probably is but when you go to a real casino there are other factors.

Floor level, table levels, wear and tear on the "frets", the ball etc, etc. So is it fair to assume in land-based casinos, in some instances, there may be an "opportunity" to take advantage of unusual conditions if you can avoid getting thrown out first?

 

[Nifty29]

-

Well i ignore the stupid comment and reply to does with some substance.

Yes it is true that roulette computers work, i have one, don't use it for real do.
I have a Huxley wheel with low frets at home and play for fun with the computer and experiment with different things.
But would not use the roulette computer in a real casino.
I know people who does and they do pretty good.

My self are only semi professional and don't play full time.
I have not made millions, even if i have positive expectation when i entering the game.
Up around 20K

I will not continue posting here as i can see that there is not much experience and knowledgeable people around.

Nope.

We're all halfwits here. No idea. None of us.

You're far better off going to

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[dionysus]

OK this has *shock horror* made me think

I've always been one of those who bang on about roulette being a game of chance and unbeatable. Which, all things being perfect, is true and I don't care what anyone says. However.... how many roulette wheels are *perfect*? I think it's safe to say a picture of one (ie: an online casino!) probably is but when you go to a real casino there are other factors.

Floor level, table levels, wear and tear on the "frets", the ball etc, etc. So is it fair to assume in land-based casinos, in some instances, there may be an "opportunity" to take advantage of unusual conditions if you can avoid getting thrown out first?

Sure, with human error, I can see this opportunity existing; a poorly contructed wheel could be exploited, flaws detected, just as you could count cards and read poker players. But I also imagine it's not an across-the-board readily applied method. Some roulette tables may be perfectly engineered, some tables use too many decks, some players are better at bluffing than you reading. I believe is SOME cases you could, to a small degree read a roulette wheel with some small degree of success, but it wouldnt apply to all.

 

[Balthazar]

If I had the money, I would open an online casino only allowing roulette players using systems.

Agreed. Them and Blackjack players using bots. We'd become rich, Nifty.

 

[skiny]

If casinos were really worried about people taking advantage of worn roulette wheels they'd probably just sneak in and swap wheels every few days so the wheel you've been watching for the last two days is now on twenty feet behind you.

 

[requiem]

It is the first time I have heard about this fella. Should be fun reading this afternoon. I am a roulette player myself so it always interesting to get to read new (old) stuff.

My your balls always land in the right pockets!