I know Ladbrokes from the street for 15 years. Top operation. Ibas sealed.
Theoretical scenario >> I have no money. Just about to sign a 250k advert deal. Ladbrokes decide to take a stand on apparent bonus abuse over 20 on 1 random player out of 1000 and pay the rest, then move them on, to make a point.
CPA showed me the way. I listen when taught. Because I would sign the 250k deal.
Corrupted? Is Caruso right? (see below)
Question - Can a portal take advertising money and take a stand on principle for the player in EVERY situation that arises?
Theoretical scenario >> I have no money. Just about to sign a 250k advert deal. Ladbrokes decide to take a stand on apparent bonus abuse over 20 on 1 random player out of 1000 and pay the rest, then move them on, to make a point.
CPA showed me the way. I listen when taught. Because I would sign the 250k deal.
Corrupted? Is Caruso right? (see below)
Question - Can a portal take advertising money and take a stand on principle for the player in EVERY situation that arises?
jetset said:To Caruso - I am curious about one thing. Given your previous positions on webmasters and affiliates having conflicts of interest in player disputes, have you now come to accept that it is possible for industry people to handle player issues without bias or favour even if advertising for online casinos?
caruso said:To Jetset - Conflict of interest is an insurmountable problem: in order to have influence you must have interests, because without the interests you will have no power - unless you are a powerful entity unto your self, as Casinomeister is after seven years in the job. The power is in those affy banners you can use to exert influence; without those, you have no power; with those, you have conflict of interest.
Question: you have a 50K media buy up: the casino steals a player's $50 bonus and $100 winnings and refunds his deposit; what do you do? If the casino just THREATENS to, then pays up, what do you do?
If you even have to CONTEMPLATE the answer, you are corrupt.