Brexit - whats the difference.....

When I see the word "assessment" and CNN in close proximity, I know to not even bother reading the rest of the post.
About as believeable as a video blog by Pinocchio which ends with a money shot of him sporting a nose that is 6 feet long.

So Choppers, I just want to say "thank you". For putting the word "assessment" and CNN in close proximity within the first 7 words of your post.
Thanks for the laugh :thumbsup:
 
I'm not averse to availing myself of the opposite side of an argument to see what kind of mental gymnastics are being undertaken to shift blame for the utter dumpster fire that Brexit is turning out to be, but this article in the extremely right-wing, pro-Boris, pro-Brexit, pro-billionaire Telegraph still caused an arched eyebrow to say the least.

It's like, 'Boris is a lying shit who completely fucked over NI, but the EU made him do it so it's not his fault'.

How far will the human mind go to avoid contemplating the idea that it might be wrong? How convoluted a fictional world will it construct to prop up its various biases? The Telegraph aims to find out.

I'm constantly told, 'You lost Remainers! Get over it!' This reads to me like the Leavers need to get over it, and start accepting the consequences of what they campaigned for, blaming the EU doesn't work so well when we've left and should be in the sunlit uplands of new opportunity and prosperity.

And never mind the content. How about the brilliantly written lead: "Our Prime Minister consistently reminds me of William Brown, Richmal Crompton's 11-year-old hero..."

1618477053642.png
 
This is happening on a constant basis, and it's going to continue. Hundreds of businesses up and down the UK who are quietly heading for the doors marked EXIT, because Brexit has left the UK essentially non-viable for their business.

------------

Furniture retailer
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
has acquired a Dutch business address to avoid having to move products to and from the UK.

"The best thing is to not have anything even touching the UK," said Viaduct founder James Mair.

"If you speak to any company, they're finding ways to remain in the EU and that's not going to happen by continuing to use UK businesses," said the London-based designer.

"It's just not viable. So they're all setting up EU businesses and EU VAT registrations."

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


1618738722750.webp
 
I don't remember anything about 'pain' being plastered on the side of a campaign bus, Brexit was supposed to be all good stuff because we held all the cards and they need us more than we need them, as I recall.
 
I don't remember anything about 'pain' being plastered on the side of a campaign bus, Brexit was supposed to be all good stuff because we held all the cards and they need us more than we need them, as I recall.
Maybe my memory isnt as good as yours, but I thought that a lot of the Brexit backers had made it clear that the first 5 - 10 years could be painful?
 
I don't remember anything about 'pain' being plastered on the side of a campaign bus, Brexit was supposed to be all good stuff because we held all the cards and they need us more than we need them, as I recall.

That can be said for both sides of the campaign. The "no" side didn't mention any of the positive things of Brexit either.

A bit like any general election. Spin it to attract voters, no matter the colour of the party.
 
Indeed. If you are to read some of the other articles (you can find positive ones too) then not all is doom and gloom. Some predict the UK will do much better by 2050 than most of our European neighbours.

The referendum was in 2016, are you seriously suggesting people were voting for things being better in 34 years?

Also, where are these positive Brexit stories?
 
Nope, but such messaging was notably exempt from the referendum campaign, and if the Leave side had said stuff like, 'Well yeah there'll be some short term pain and to be honest, we're probably talking 2050 before we'll be able to tell if it's a success or not, oh and by the way we're going to destroy hundreds of small and medium sized UK businesses along the way' - things might have played out differently.

Let me put it this way, actually telling the truth about Brexit wouldn't have been a winning strategy, hence the whole thing was founded on a pack of lies. See also of course the NI situation, which the Leave side either completely avoided or simply brushed away with lies, I don't think, 'Vote Leave for a border in the Irish Sea!' would have been a great slogan, but it would have been truthful.
 
Nope, but such messaging was notably exempt from the referendum campaign, and if the Leave side had said stuff like, 'Well yeah there'll be some short term pain and to be honest, we're probably talking 2050 before we'll be able to tell if it's a success or not, oh and by the way we're going to destroy hundreds of small and medium sized UK businesses along the way' - things might have played out differently.

Let me put it this way, actually telling the truth about Brexit wouldn't have been a winning strategy, hence the whole thing was founded on a pack of lies. See also of course the NI situation, which the Leave side either completely avoided or simply brushed away with lies, I don't think, 'Vote Leave for a border in the Irish Sea!' would have been a great slogan, but it would have been truthful.

So all the " the worlds going to end if its a vote to leave " that was the only strand of the remain campaign was 100% correct and fair comment?
Seems to me that both sides made claims that were spurious to say the least, but some commentators only want to point out the comments and claims made by one side?
I have no axe to grind on this subject as I dont give a fiddlers about Brexit, I live in the here and now and have a lot of other things to concern myself with in life other than Brexit, but from the side lines its really unbelievable how much the remainers seem to hold the Brexiteers to every word they ever uttered but are very willing to forget the one and only strand of the remain campaign, project fear and how the UK would be bankrupt and and a third world country from day one.
 
I've readily admitted in this very thread that the Remain side fucked up with its more apocalyptic predictions, it doesn't tend to lend an argument much credibility, although in fairness there were far more nuanced commentators who were much more realistic about what the Brexit downsides would be, but they were wafted away by people like Gove with his 'people are fed up with experts' comments.

As for 'Project Fear', an awful lot of that stuff has come true. Also remember that we avoided some of the very worst possible impacts as a No Deal was averted, and as thin as Johnson's eventual deal was, it was still better than No Deal.
 
I reckon hardly any people on the entire planet have a positive feeling when they hear or read the name 'EU', [in contrast to the continent of europe which people across the board like] the EU brings out all the worse in politicians and bureaucrats combined, mostly ignoring the public and just doing what they want, and at great expense.

Surely if you're left minded or liberal, and from the uk, the idea of having to pay the EU £10 billion net in order to access the single market and trade with the countries nearby should be an anathema, especially when we have to cut back services annually and have a lot of important things we could spend that money on instead? [and we had a significant negative trade balance, importing more from europe than we exported back]

In 1999, 60% of all UK goods exports were to the EU; this share has generally fallen since, reaching 46% IN 2019.
Overall, the UK has had a trade deficit with the EU in every year since 1999. The UK’s trade deficit with the EU peaked at -3.7% of UK GDP in 2016, though this has recovered slightly, reaching -3.2% in 2018, before reaching -3.6% in 2019.
By contrast, the UK has had a surplus with non-EU countries since 2011. This surplus peaked at 2.2% of UK GDP in 2019, up from 1.6% in 2014.


[edit: and there is something called the 'rotterdam effect' which may mean the real figures of uk exports to the eu have been even worse over the years]

--------------

So we've probably been taking the money earned from our surplus trade with the rest of the world [non-eu] and sending it to the EU coffers instead, absolute madness year in and year out.
 
Last edited:
With respect mack, we've been over this before, the EU is basically a club, and to be a member of a club and enjoy the benefits of being a member, you pay the membership fees.

There are multiple studies that show the economic damage already inflicted by Brexit eclipses every penny we paid in over our entire membership. (I've linked them more than once in this thread already.)

There are some arguments for Brexit I can understand, even if I don't agree with them, the 'sovereignty' argument for example. When it comes to economics though, we're just objectively worse off not being a member than we were as a member, and the damage is still ongoing on a daily basis, and it's going to get worse, although apparently things might be looking up by the year 2050.
 
With respect mack, we've been over this before, the EU is basically a club, and to be a member of a club and enjoy the benefits of being a member, you pay the membership fees.

There are multiple studies that show the economic damage already inflicted by Brexit eclipses every penny we paid in over our entire membership. (I've linked them more than once in this thread already.)

There are some arguments for Brexit I can understand, even if I don't agree with them, the 'sovereignty' argument for example. When it comes to economics though, we're just objectively worse off not being a member than we were as a member, and the damage is still ongoing on a daily basis, and it's going to get worse, although apparently things might be looking up by the year 2050.

Normally in a club members pay the same fee, and the club management have to keep proper account of where the club's money is spent, plus they don't boss you around in terms of what you do in your own home.

With respect my other points stand, and we apparently had a big say in how the club was run, so more fool us for letting it, the EU, get too big in expenditure and sovereignty wise.

I think we need to wait a bit longer than 4 months for the final verdict. I saw a week ago a tweet that stated trade between france and the uk was back to normal levels [taking account of covid]

The fact is there is more economic growth outside of the EU, so freeing ourselves up from EU red tape and negotiating directly has got to be a trade benefit, plus the 10 billion membership fee saved.

And this today:

 
BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The Netherlands on Thursday lost its fight against an EU-wide ban on electric pulse fishing after Europe's top court said EU lawmakers have wide discretion in making legislation.

Pulse fishing is widely used in the Netherlands, which says the technique reduces unwanted bycatch and avoids ploughing nets along the seabed.

Opponents including French fishermen and environmentalists say the technique - which uses electrodes to emit electric waves and stun fish which then float upwards and are scooped up by giant nets - deplete fish numbers.

The concerns prompted the European Parliament and the EU Council to agree to a ban in 2019, with a transitional period running to June 30 this year under certain strict conditions.

----------
I don't know anything about pulse fishing, whether it is good or bad, but the dutch are now told it is illegal for them to do it, this sort of thing will increase euroscepticism, as it means a democracy cannot manage it's own affairs and is overruled by the club into which it already pays a lot of dough [tax payers money]. At some point there will either be reform and a row back of the bossy boots approach or more people will turn eurosceptic.

A different subject but I see a bit of a parallel in the football super league breakaway from uefa's champions league competition, at some point a group of the wealthy nations in europe could decide to just go it alone with a simpler, cheaper to run trade zone not the growing behemoth of the present EU.
 
I think we need to wait a bit longer than 4 months for the final verdict. I saw a week ago a tweet that stated trade between france and the uk was back to normal levels [taking account of covid]

The fact is there is more economic growth outside of the EU, so freeing ourselves up from EU red tape and negotiating directly has got to be a trade benefit, plus the 10 billion membership fee saved.
I actually agree with you on that mack, it may very well turn out to be that Brexit was, in the long term, the best economic choice.

Admittedly very few of the modelling predictions suggest that will be the case, but nobody can say for certain, four months in, what will transpire in 5 or 10 or 25 years.

What I can say for certain is that, for example, the fishing communities that have been absolutely devastated by the immediate consequences of Brexit didn't vote for this. It's well known that many fishing communities voted for Brexit as they believed all the lies they were told, that new markets would be opened up and the EU market would be just as accessible as before, no new red tape, no new restrictions, just fresh opportunities and reclaiming our waters for UK fishermen. They certainly weren't voting for some theoretical prosperous future in 20 years time, and they definitely weren't voting to bankrupt themselves within six months.

The UK SME business community voted for Remain overall, not least because they understood just how intertwined and interdependent EU supply chains and markets were on each other, and once the intention to leave the single market and customs union was made, they knew difficult times would be ahead, but the shocking thinness of Johnson's deal has left many of them with their businesses in tatters, again, it's no use to them if things get better in a decade or more, if they can't even make it through the next year.

I keep an eye on the Davis Downside Dossier, which lists Brexit upsides and downsides.

Upsides currently has 11 entries, downsides currently has 134 entries. Note that they are receptive to any credible submission, and if the facts check out they add it to the upside column, so it's not just 'Remainer Tears'. (Pulse fishing, by the way, went into the 'Myth' category.)

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Just thought i would slip a comment on the thread.

Maybe Brexit has not worked out the way planned. Tho Coronavirus has also done a good job in destroying the economy short term and maybe long term.

5 years from now we might be better off or we might be totally screwed.

You might turn out to be correct in your views that it was worst thing ever Chopley time will tell.

But here is the main point. All this people did not get what they voted for maybe correct for a few. But in truth out of all the voters the vast majority have no clue about any of it. They just voted Brexit for various reasons. Most have no clue whether things are better for them or not. They will not be sitting thinking we got lied to as they will not even know if country is better or not and won't even know a thing about companies moving abroad or going bust.

Truth of matter is most people that voted would not even sit thinking how will country be in 10 years. They voted as they got caught up in the hysteria of it all and thought why should we be run by europe and if i vote i can stop my street getting full of immigrants . Sad but true.

It is just the same in Scotland. Anyone with a bit of sense can see that if we go independent the country is screwed and financially we will be fucked and we would need a border with the main country England that nearly all trade goes through.

But most people have no clue about any consequences. They just go we will be Independent and not answer to England. God there are many thousands that even vote independence because they hate the Royal Family. Fact of matter is i would say that in all these votes the majority and i mean actual majority have not got a clue what they are voting for.

So yes lies on both sides. Yes Fishermen etc. might be getting a rough deal. Businesses might be struggling. But then again the country still remained Locked down when more businesses have went bust than Brexit will cause. But to keep saying the people did not get what they voted for is not exactly correct. Some did not get what they voted for but most did not have a clue what they voted for and still have no clue whats happened.
 
Chopley makes some valid points but as a leaver I did vote with my eyes open - I expected a short-mid term transition which could reduce my/our standard of living via prices for imports, trade issues in the early years etc. But I considered this was a price worth paying to buy back our FULL independence from this out-of-control, cumbersome monstrosity.

Anybody arguing that the UK having 100% of it's own parliament to 11% of a foreign one wasn't taking back control - well they need certifying. As a trading market/union, the European idea was fine. But single currency, single supreme court, single parliament and open borders? Nah. The biggest irony is that it was Thatcher who was the main creator of the forerunner via deregulation that led to a more dynamic and prosperous EU but that lasted but a few years before the inevitable control freaks and ambitious foreign politicos and bureaucrats hijacked it.

Now the price we paid for a quick deal is dangerously near selling N.I. down the river so I hope Johnson does invoke Article 16 when necessary, if not already. You see, the already-bitter EU leaders after Brexit are now even more twisted due to the complete monumental fuck-up they've made over vaccination and find it unbearable the the UK is opening up and they are closing down due to their third waves. And our weak spot, a scab they can pick at for petty revenge? Yes, Northern Ireland.
 
Just thought i would slip a comment on the thread.

Maybe Brexit has not worked out the way planned. Tho Coronavirus has also done a good job in destroying the economy short term and maybe long term.

5 years from now we might be better off or we might be totally screwed.

You might turn out to be correct in your views that it was worst thing ever Chopley time will tell.

But here is the main point. All this people did not get what they voted for maybe correct for a few. But in truth out of all the voters the vast majority have no clue about any of it. They just voted Brexit for various reasons. Most have no clue whether things are better for them or not. They will not be sitting thinking we got lied to as they will not even know if country is better or not and won't even know a thing about companies moving abroad or going bust.

Truth of matter is most people that voted would not even sit thinking how will country be in 10 years. They voted as they got caught up in the hysteria of it all and thought why should we be run by europe and if i vote i can stop my street getting full of immigrants . Sad but true.

It is just the same in Scotland. Anyone with a bit of sense can see that if we go independent the country is screwed and financially we will be fucked and we would need a border with the main country England that nearly all trade goes through.

But most people have no clue about any consequences. They just go we will be Independent and not answer to England. God there are many thousands that even vote independence because they hate the Royal Family. Fact of matter is i would say that in all these votes the majority and i mean actual majority have not got a clue what they are voting for.

So yes lies on both sides. Yes Fishermen etc. might be getting a rough deal. Businesses might be struggling. But then again the country still remained Locked down when more businesses have went bust than Brexit will cause. But to keep saying the people did not get what they voted for is not exactly correct. Some did not get what they voted for but most did not have a clue what they voted for and still have no clue whats happened.
Unfortunately here the opposition parties have learned nothing from the negative campaign of the first Ref and the Remain one re Brexit; some of the stuff being put through the doors is/or verging on 'Vote for us to stop her' etc. Can't speak for anyone else but if i was on the fence it would tend to tip me into their garden.

Looks a real possibility they'll get the majority next Month as well, even with Salmond using the knife sharpener.
 
If Sturgeon is in any way suggesting leaving the UK will enable re-entry to the EU she is talking utter shite. Scotland as a single country is nowhere near, and cannot achieve in the near future, the qualifying conditions regarding GDP, national debt and expenditure.
Even if they could, how on earth would it help? Would EU companies flood there, to about the most remote part of Europe from their main markets? A small market, on its own of about 7m people? As someone pointed out earlier, you would have a land and sea border between Scotland and NI/England with customs checks too, and Scotland would face the same restrictions on trade with the rest of the UK as the EU countries do now. The UK as a whole is a big enough and wealthy enough entity to survive outside Europe. I doubt Scotland is, outside of the UK.

Unlike Brexit, IndyRef has no historical, political or economic reason to occur.

The just seems to be an endless string of politicos like Salmond, Sturgeon who are ambitious personalities eager to see who can ultimately get themselves immortalized in Bronze outside Holyrood as the great warrior who won independence. I just hope that that half-million quid, sorry 560,000 Euro statue doesn't exact a much greater cost from my fellow countrymen north of the border.

If I were you guys, I'd be sweating like Alec Salmond walking through a typing pool.
 
Just thought i would slip a comment on the thread.

Maybe Brexit has not worked out the way planned. Tho Coronavirus has also done a good job in destroying the economy short term and maybe long term.

5 years from now we might be better off or we might be totally screwed.

You might turn out to be correct in your views that it was worst thing ever Chopley time will tell.

But here is the main point. All this people did not get what they voted for maybe correct for a few. But in truth out of all the voters the vast majority have no clue about any of it. They just voted Brexit for various reasons. Most have no clue whether things are better for them or not. They will not be sitting thinking we got lied to as they will not even know if country is better or not and won't even know a thing about companies moving abroad or going bust.

Truth of matter is most people that voted would not even sit thinking how will country be in 10 years. They voted as they got caught up in the hysteria of it all and thought why should we be run by europe and if i vote i can stop my street getting full of immigrants . Sad but true.

It is just the same in Scotland. Anyone with a bit of sense can see that if we go independent the country is screwed and financially we will be fucked and we would need a border with the main country England that nearly all trade goes through.

But most people have no clue about any consequences. They just go we will be Independent and not answer to England. God there are many thousands that even vote independence because they hate the Royal Family. Fact of matter is i would say that in all these votes the majority and i mean actual majority have not got a clue what they are voting for.

So yes lies on both sides. Yes Fishermen etc. might be getting a rough deal. Businesses might be struggling. But then again the country still remained Locked down when more businesses have went bust than Brexit will cause. But to keep saying the people did not get what they voted for is not exactly correct. Some did not get what they voted for but most did not have a clue what they voted for and still have no clue whats happened.

Again Paul, there's a lot in there I agree with, and I've said as much myself earlier in this thread.

The fact is an awful lot of people had no bloody idea what they voting for, and I include Remainers in that as equally as Leavers.

I'm still of the opinion it should have never gone to a referendum, the issues are simply far too complex and nuanced for the average person to be expected to have any understanding of without doing a huge amount of research first, I don't care if someone is a Remainer or a Leaver, the vast majority of them had no clue that, for example, the situation with NI would end up being so precarious.

(For clarity, I'm not saying voters on either side were too stupid to understand the issues, just that they'd never had any cause to try to.)

This is literally what we elect politicians and governments for, so they can deal with all this complex shit, as their actual jobs (which they are paid very well for), whilst we get on with all the stuff we have to deal with in our own lives, IMO the referendum was just an abrogation of responsibility by a political class that was too cowardly to have the courage of its convictions.

The EU wasn't even remotely on the radar of most people as a cause for concern prior to the referendum, we all know Cameron only promised one in the first place as he was worried about UKIP nibbling at Tory heels in a few too many marginal constituencies.

One thing I will say is that when it comes to the business impact, many businesses who managed just fine last year during Covid, are now struggling horrendously with Brexit. Companies that managed to carry on running and keep exports/imports to and from the EU flowing smoothly all through 2020 have been knocked for six by the imposition of customs checks, extra costs, mountains of paperwork, delivery chains becoming impenetrable nightmares etc. UK businesses will go under, UK jobs will be lost, and the EU is ready and waiting to welcome both.

So yes, I agree with the broad thrust of what you're saying there Paul, but given that reality, I honestly think you can logically conclude from that position that the referendum itself was a bad idea, why hand over responsibility for a decision with such huge potential consequences to a load of people who literally have no real idea what those consequences might be, don't really care about them afterwards, and don't even know whether or not things have got better or worse as a result.

And for the record, I include Remainers and Leavers equally in that analysis, and indeed myself. I've only clued myself up in the years since the referendum result came through, prior to it actually being held I, like an awful lot of people, never gave it much thought if I'm honest. I'd have ticked the 'Remain' box, but I couldn't have given much in the way of good reasons for doing so.
 
Now the price we paid for a quick deal is dangerously near selling N.I. down the river so I hope Johnson does invoke Article 16 when necessary, if not already. You see, the already-bitter EU leaders after Brexit are now even more twisted due to the complete monumental fuck-up they've made over vaccination and find it unbearable the the UK is opening up and they are closing down due to their third waves. And our weak spot, a scab they can pick at for petty revenge? Yes, Northern Ireland.

This guy you mean?

Yeah the EU are totally to blame for this one!

If only he hadn't negotiated, campaigned for, and signed a deal that put a border in the Irish sea.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


1618932433311.png
 
and the EU market would be just as accessible as before, no new red tape, no new restrictions, just fresh opportunities and reclaiming our waters for UK fishermen

but the shocking thinness of Johnson's deal has left many of them with their businesses in tatters, again, it's no use to them if things get better in a decade or more, if they can't even make it through the next year.

I agree with these points, but conclude the british govt didn't do a good enough job negotiating the exit deal, and then to compound that, didn't proactively assist affected businesses to navigate the new paperwork and controls.

They've sacrificed damage to some sectors [sme firms and fishermen] and weakened the union to get a 'free trade' deal over the line that they could proclaim across the headlines, maybe the alternative was too scary.

But have we seen or read clear information, via a tv report or newspaper article, of examples where red tape problems faced by fishermen and the SME's are insurmountable, the specifics etc...it would be better if they were known about in the hope they could be resolved, otherwise it's vague moaning that no one can verify or look into solving.

The EU do not want to make brexit a smooth, pain free experience, so that has to be taken into account - how many of these are real problems with some logic behind them, and how many have been created just to be awkward.
 
Last edited:

Brexit: New study shows half of leavers were not ‘left behind’ supporters but ‘affluent’​

DAILY EXPRESS

A report by UK in a Changing Europe shows that half of Brexiteers were actually comfortably well off. The research highlights that they did not have expectations of huge economic gains but thought that leaving the EU would help address other issues in Britain.

The report reads: “An image of the left-behind leave voter has taken hold: a poorly educated inhabitant of a faded seaside town or the grim, post-industrial north.

"But we forget too easily that no place (or group of people) is wholly homogenous.

“Many people voted for Brexit even in the most pro-remain places; more than a million people in Scotland and 1.5 million in London voted leave.”

The report added: “Comparing the two groups finds that the Leave ‘tribe’ shares a sense of domestic priorities that require significant further investment: the police and fighting crime; the NHS and care workers; bringing back proper, secure work for high quality domestic production – as well as apprenticeships in real jobs.”
 
In other news, intelligence void Tory MP Andrew Bridgen and prominent Leaver says we've been 'stitched up' by the EU.

Very clever of them considering we're not a member anymore and have taken back control whilst holding all the cards.

 
So I guess we've all seen what's happened with Norway and fishing.

(If not, then the TL: DR is that Norway and the UK have failed to reach an agreement on fishing rights, with the result that the UK now can't catch fish in Norwegian waters (putting a large UK trawler out of business that catches 10% of cod consumed in the UK), and the Norwegians can't fish in UK waters - for the next twelve months, details here:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
)

The interesting thing is that the 'don't they know we're sovereign equals' and 'this is the EU punishing us' narrative falls down here, because Norway isn't an EU member. This is where the sovereign equal argument works both ways, and Norway as such a country has decided to flex its muscles, and we walked away from the table with nothing, as Norway felt it had more to gain by telling us to bugger off than not doing so.

Of course, if the UK were still an EU member, they wouldn't have been able to do this, because all this stuff was negotiated as part of wider EU deals, but now we have to go up against Norway as a 'sovereign equal', and it hasn't worked out well.

The final kicker here is that Norway will still be able to sell their cod into the UK tariff-free, as they will benefit from the trade deal the UK signed with EU, and Norway are a member of the Single Market. (Remember, that thing the UK quit as part of its Brexit hissy fit.)

So if you want to stand up for Britain, it's time to start boycotting good old British cod and chips, because we won't be catching any of it.

Who knew this stuff could get so complicated, eh?

(The problem with cod is there's very little of it in UK waters, so we're left with a load of fish that we don't eat and just export to the EU. Or rather, did export to the EU, until Brexit fucked that as well.)
 
That's in the headline that I posted. I'm not making any particular comment one way or the other, save to say that British and French military boats heading to Jersey for a stand off thanks to another facet of Johnson's dogshit Brexit deal seems suboptimal at best.

I mean, what are they going to do, actually start shooting at each other?

It's quite a complicated situation, although the TL: DR is that Johnson has, shock horror, thrown more people under the bus to get what he wants -
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


1620296816238.png
 
A proper analysis here for those who are interested.

Neither side seems to have covered themselves in glory.

The short version is more Brexit mess, unpicking things that had been settled for years, and the Jersey government replacing it with something not fit for purpose.

Expect a climbdown shortly.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


1620310935790.webp
 
This bit made me laugh....

Claude La Vaullée, a Norman skipper who has fished off Jersey for 40 years, found that his boat, Le Cach, had been given the right to fish for 11 hours a year. He told the regional newspaper Ouest France, that he and other skippers had now equipped their vessels to “re-stage the Battle of Trafalgar”.

I guess Monseiur Claude has kinda forgot that Trafalgar didn't exactly "end well" for the French :laugh:

I mean he could have at least named a naval battle that the French actually won. :rolleyes:

Quelle con stupide
 
Six months apart, this was our fearless EU negotiator who 'got the job done'.

(I'm guessing we've all noticed that British farmers are next to get thrown under the bus?)

Interesting that he's now kind of blaming the UK parliament for signing a shit deal with the EU, that apparently we had to sign, even though we negotiated it and it was so great and worth fighting an election for.

1621534989940.webp

1621535038518.webp

1621535062592.webp
 
Nope would imagine it is just you that has noticed it on here lol.

Fair enough, I appreciate Brexit and Reality need to be kept a safe distance from each other :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top