32Red Allowed me to gamble after asking for self exclusion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
You can band about different insults or mental illness at me, but I choose to react different to his thread as he clearly does have a problem, the thread you refer too I felt your typical "lost my money, I want it back" thread.
I can be as harsh as anyone on people like this. But in his case, he asked TWICE to be banned, they did not so he is owed back his money. Simple!

As for you, you have spent the day and evening posting with anger and resentment at the opening post. you clearly live a unhappy life if you get off on putting this guy down all evening. So crawl back under your rock.
Think what you may but i can understand your anger at me ,caught out being two faced isnt a good look.
Anyway i pmed the op hours ago outlining my gambling history and the state im in now because of MY own doing(undoing) and hope he takes it on board,but i dont agree with him at all on this,its a cop out,nothing more nothing less.I have lost over 6 times the amount hes disputing in one day so i clearly know the position all too well of a problem gambler,many of you will be compulsive gamblers and addicted also to slots,but there is a difference when the word problem is brought into it.
I dont intend to self exclude anywhere,i dont cashout either,but as i told him theres one way i completely know would end my problem,as with his, and only really applies to the online form of gambling.And that is to approach your bank and inform them of your problem and ask them to intervene.Attacking the casino is like attacking the drug dealer,knock one out and theres another to take his place.
Why cant you guys see this?or does everyone need a scapegoat,something else to blame...
 
32Red is an multi-award winning casino reviewed by Casinomeister
Think what you may but i can understand your anger at me ,caught out being two faced isnt a good look.
Anyway i pmed the op hours ago outlining my gambling history and the state im in now because of MY own doing(undoing) and hope he takes it on board,but i dont agree with him at all on this,its a cop out,nothing more nothing less.I have lost over 6 times the amount hes disputing in one day so i clearly know the position all too well of a problem gambler,many of you will be compulsive gamblers and addicted also to slots,but there is a difference when the word problem is brought into it.
I dont intend to self exclude anywhere,i dont cashout either,but as i told him theres one way i completely know would end my problem,as with his, and only really applies to the online form of gambling.And that is to approach your bank and inform them of your problem and ask them to intervene.Attacking the casino is like attacking the drug dealer,knock one out and theres another to take his place.
Why cant you guys see this?or does everyone need a scapegoat,something else to blame...

You don't understand, just because it can't be stopped doesn't mean you leave it unregulated.

Who cares if he goes and loses it elsewhere? Point is 32red have a duty as do every other casino, they failed him and he will get his 25k back.

100% he gets it back, and hes entitled too it. If he then goes and loses it elsewhere, then thats on him.
 
Think what you may but i can understand your anger at me ,caught out being two faced isnt a good look.
Anyway i pmed the op hours ago outlining my gambling history and the state im in now because of MY own doing(undoing) and hope he takes it on board,but i dont agree with him at all on this,its a cop out,nothing more nothing less.I have lost over 6 times the amount hes disputing in one day so i clearly know the position all too well of a problem gambler,many of you will be compulsive gamblers and addicted also to slots,but there is a difference when the word problem is brought into it.
I dont intend to self exclude anywhere,i dont cashout either,but as i told him theres one way i completely know would end my problem,as with his, and only really applies to the online form of gambling.And that is to approach your bank and inform them of your problem and ask them to intervene.Attacking the casino is like attacking the drug dealer,knock one out and theres another to take his place.
Why cant you guys see this?or does everyone need a scapegoat,something else to blame...

I don't think that anybody has said he is blameless.

But an organisation such as 32Red should take on some responsibility of this failure too, and that appears to be missed by you. They make plenty of profit and with that comes responsibility, unlike your drug dealer who is just a criminal so you're comparing apples with oranges.
 
You don't understand, just because it can't be stopped doesn't mean you leave it unregulated.

Who cares if he goes and loses it elsewhere? Point is 32red have a duty as do every other casino, they failed him and he will get his 25k back.

100% he gets it back, and hes entitled too it. If he then goes and loses it elsewhere, then thats on him.

How are you 100% certain have you spoken to 32red on this ?

I would advise you wait until you hear the other side of this. And most times they always is another side.

He is playing the system, he knows and refuses to stop , sadly because he is so wrapped up in his addiction. At this level of gambling unless there is an intervention (and I hope for his sake there is )
it will take him loosing everything before he can be ready to face facts and start to address his issues.

So no its not 100% that he will get refunded. Far from it.
 
I was on my phone earlier so didn't post properly what I was thinking.

The OP clearly has a problem. In fact it couldn't be any clearer from the email posted in the thread. The account should have been at least closed or blocked while they double checked with the player if they had any queries. I am 100% sure he should not have been able to deposit over a week later. If he emailed them, deposited £10k 5 mins later, lost it, then complained, I wouldn't have any sympathy, but this was over a week later, and thats not taking into account any live chat that took place. That is more than enough time to take action on an account.

He was begging for his money back in the email, I'm sorry, but if anyone can't see that was from a problem gambler then they need their eyes testing. I do completely agree that the casino should not refund any deposits before that email, but I am completely sure they should refund the £25k that was lost after that.

The responsible gambling measures are in place to prevent problem gamblers from getting into situations such as this. You should not have to specifically say 'self exclude' to have an account, at the very least, temporarily blocked. If a customer states they are addicted, they are spending more than they can afford, anything like that, then the account should be blocked immediately with a view to exclusion.

I still don't get the attitudes of many people posting in this thread. There was a 40+ page thread about this when 32red changed the way they dealt with RG matters, almost all was critical, then when something happens, which was predicted, almost all the posts are defending 32red. I genuinely don't understand that.

Reading posts, it seems to me people don't actually understand what an addiction is. I do think the term is overused, but someone who begs for help, and stands to lose his home, then goes ahead and deposits another £25000 is, in my view, addicted. Its not like its £500 (not that the amount matters), it was £19000 then £25000, so £44000 at one casino. £44000 the OP couldn't afford. Instead of saying he should have learnt his lesson after his last thread, people should understand an addiction is exactly what it says on the tin, an addiction. Reason goes out the window, even though theres a nagging voice in your head saying don't do it, it doesn't matter, you will do it, as all that matters is getting your next fix, that fix can be a can of lager, a bottle of vodka, a cigarette, a line of coke, a bag of smack, or trying to win your money back at a casino. It doesn't matter what the fix is, the fact is, you can't control the urge. FOTB's in bookies are commonly referred to the crack cocaine of gambling, online casinos can be worse as your stakes can be much higher, as can the wins. They aren't called that because they are harmless. Thats the reason the regulations around responsible gaming are so strict, and why casinos should follow them to the letter.

32red have had quite a few complaints about this exact thing on here, its clear to me they don't care, thats obvious from the large thread from last year, a search on here alone for 32red self exclusion brings up pages of results.

Why cant you guys see this? or does everyone need a scapegoat ,something else to blame...

I understand what you are saying, but the fact is, the law is there to prevent situations like this. Assuming the email was sent and the OP's account if matters is correct then 32red have been (in my view) negligent in allowing someone, who has stated they have a gambling problem, to keep playing. This is not in keeping with their license. I don't think you are in the UK from your posts, and I think the OP is, the rules in the UK seem to be much stricter than elsewhere, and if the casino is in breach of them, which taking the OPs account at face value, then he should be refunded. Yes, he might open an account at a new casino and lose the £25k to them, but thats beside the point, the only question at this point should be, should 32red have allowed him to continue gambling.

To the OP

You need help, now. You know that, as does everyone who has read this thread. You need to get it. You might already have a CPN due to your other problems, if you do, ring them in morning and make an appointment to see them. If you don't, ring and self refer yourself, ring your doctor for the number for self referral for counselling. If you have family you can trust, get one of them to manage your accounts, you can do this legally, so that anything spent from your accounts has to be authorised by them, or (and this will probably be easier and quicker) cancel your bank & credit cards, you can say you lost them, get new ones, don't open them when the new ones arrive, give them to whoever is going to help you so you never see the new numbers, that way there is no way you can gamble yourself. Self exclude from every single bookmaker, casino or any other site you have an account with. You can do that tonight. Self exclude for 5 years, not 6 months, You probably won't want to as the addiction will cloud your mind, telling you to leave one or two open, ignore it and close them.

Simple fact is, if you don't get help AND help yourself you are going to lose your house and everything else. I hope you sort yourself out, but you won't unless you start the process yourself. Good luck with the future.
 
well ill just have to disagree with you two guys,if thats how your system was designed to function nutnut and youre happy its working to prevent online gamblers further escalating thier problem,i have no words.
And interlog you obviously see 32red as breaching your laws by reading both threads and have no suspicion of decietfulness on behalf of the op,well i did have words but theyve gone over your head.
anyway have a nice night chaps,the birds are chirping and happy slotting
 
Sorry but I am on 32 reds side

1. You didnt lose £19k as first described in the first instance, you was winning £19k

2. You said in live chat you were told to email to self exclude. As others have preluded too, you didn't. You asked to close your account. There is a massive difference.

3. The email makes no reference to any live chat conversation you have had.

4. You said you would lose your house, business etc etc but then find £25k to gamble.

May I suggest the following.

1. If not already, have you agoraphobia condition diagnosed by your GP.
2. Tell your bank to stop gambling deposits being permissible from your accounts.
3. Seek psychological help. You are obviously paid plenty, have a Psychotherapist come to your home.

It does sound harsh but we see this numerous times a week and while Im sure your friend was very happy for the help with the dog, it doesn't influence the outcome of this.
 
well ill just have to disagree with you two guys,if thats how your system was designed to function nutnut and youre happy its working to prevent online gamblers further escalating thier problem,i have no words.
And interlog you obviously see 32red as breaching your laws by reading both threads and have no suspicion of decietfulness on behalf of the op,well i did have words but theyve gone over your head.
anyway have a nice night chaps,the birds are chirping and happy slotting

Says your from New Zealand? The way UK gambling laws work it's suppose to protect people who need protecting. I one for am glad it's designed that way.

Deeplay I am certain he gets it back.
 
well ill just have to disagree with you two guys,if thats how your system was designed to function nutnut and youre happy its working to prevent online gamblers further escalating thier problem,i have no words.
And interlog you obviously see 32red as breaching your laws by reading both threads and have no suspicion of decietfulness on behalf of the op,well i did have words but theyve gone over your head.
anyway have a nice night chaps,the birds are chirping and happy slotting

I may well have my suspicion but the point here is the second deposit and what should happen with that. At the end of the day 32red could have protected themselves from this by simply closing the account after the email / chat and that would have been the end of it.

You can't seem to see this.

And at the end of the day, if the OP's account is correct then legislation will stipulate the course of action and as it stands the casino is on the back foot.
 
well i decided to ask chat at 32red about the self exclusion section on thier website,i hope it sheds some light,probably not considering im from a foriegn country

Natalie: Hi, my name is Natalie.
Natalie: Hi there Danny
danny: hi natalie in your responsible gambling section theres an icon link at the very bottom of the page to do with self exclusion
danny: what happens if you activate that icon?
Natalie:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


If you click on the hyperlink here - it will take you to log into the Responsible Gaming Application
danny: and then what?
Natalie: you then have to go through the process of requesting the Self Exclusion form - this will then be sent to your email address registered to your account
Natalie: you would then need to complete this and only at the time of submitting this back to us, will we be able to update the Self Exclusion facility on your account
danny: so basically it would take the average person how long to take effect?
Natalie: once completed and submitted back - we would usually be able to apply this on the account within the hour
danny: ok and how long has this facility been here?like is it new
Natalie: If someone is looking to Self Exclude they can also request for the information to be sent to them via email, by contacting us on live chat, phone call or email
Natalie: no, this has been in place for quite some time now
danny: more than a couple of months?
danny: im not looking to exclude as im new,im having a debate with someone about the whole self exclusion stuff
Natalie: Yes last year
Natalie: Ok, i understand

If i was op and i wanted to self exclude,i would have done this above do you all agree?
If i was op and thought i had some chance to recoup my bad nights losses,i would have sent an email to my vip manager pleading near death of relatives,state of mind etc
If i was some posters here(excluding myself and obvious others)id resign myself to thinking im a guilible twat right now,twat is the right word british use for how i put it isnt it?
 
well i decided to ask chat at 32red about the self exclusion section on thier website,i hope it sheds some light,probably not considering im from a foriegn country

Natalie: Hi, my name is Natalie.
Natalie: Hi there Danny
danny: hi natalie in your responsible gambling section theres an icon link at the very bottom of the page to do with self exclusion
danny: what happens if you activate that icon?
Natalie:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


If you click on the hyperlink here - it will take you to log into the Responsible Gaming Application
danny: and then what?
Natalie: you then have to go through the process of requesting the Self Exclusion form - this will then be sent to your email address registered to your account
Natalie: you would then need to complete this and only at the time of submitting this back to us, will we be able to update the Self Exclusion facility on your account
danny: so basically it would take the average person how long to take effect?
Natalie: once completed and submitted back - we would usually be able to apply this on the account within the hour
danny: ok and how long has this facility been here?like is it new
Natalie: If someone is looking to Self Exclude they can also request for the information to be sent to them via email, by contacting us on live chat, phone call or email
Natalie: no, this has been in place for quite some time now
danny: more than a couple of months?
danny: im not looking to exclude as im new,im having a debate with someone about the whole self exclusion stuff
Natalie: Yes last year
Natalie: Ok, i understand

If i was op and i wanted to self exclude,i would have done this above do you all agree?
If i was op and thought i had some chance to recoup my bad nights losses,i would have sent an email to my vip manager pleading near death of relatives,state of mind etc
If i was some posters here(excluding myself and obvious others)id resign myself to thinking im a guilible twat right now,twat is the right word british use for how i put it isnt it?

It might be an idea for you to go and read up on UK license conditions, in particular the parts about responsible gaming as you don't seem to understand how it works here. What you are saying might be right where you are, but it is wrong in the UK.
Has the OP missed out parts of the story, possibly. Has he tried to gamble risk free, possibly, we don't know. However IF what he has posted is correct then I am 100% sure he will get his money back, and in my mind he should, under current UK legislation.
If everything is true then 32Red were aware they had a problem gambler and should have stopped him playing any further.
 
Says your from New Zealand? The way UK gambling laws work it's suppose to protect people who need protecting. I one for am glad it's designed that way.

i do love sarcasm and im not sure if your post is an intended attempt or not?anyway its a good one for how i interpret it:)
If you seriously believe its protecting the people who need it,youre deluded......
Is it any different to a government education authority overseeing the removal of a teacher who has admitted he has an child pornography problem from one college but allowed him to go apply at another college without disclosing his problem to the new one?
sorry for the extreme comparrisson but i think it may wake you up
 
Says your from New Zealand? The way UK gambling laws work it's suppose to protect people who need protecting. I one for am glad it's designed that way.

i do love sarcasm and im not sure if your post is an intended attempt or not?anyway its a good one for how i interpret it:)
If you seriously believe its protecting the people who need it,youre deluded......
Is it any different to a government education authority overseeing the removal of a teacher who has admitted he has an child pornography problem from one college but allowed him to go apply at another college without disclosing his problem to the new one?
sorry for the extreme comparrisson but i think it may wake you up

The comparison is ridiculous and doesn't even make sense.

If he turned up at the new job and stated he had a child pornography problem and they told him to submit a e-mail stating it, then I would blame the college. That IS the comparison you're looking for.

It doesn't matter if he is abusing the system, if 32red had acted correctly they would not have to give back the 25k as he would be banned and no longer playing with them. They have created their own problem as they did not ban him like he asked TWICE.

Tke UK gambling laws state this, my personal opinion on him or anyone with issues doesn't matter, the law is on his side and 32red did not act correctly. (IF WHAT SAID IS TRUE)
 
i do love sarcasm and im not sure if your post is an intended attempt or not?anyway its a good one for how i interpret it:)
If you seriously believe its protecting the people who need it,youre deluded......
Is it any different to a government education authority overseeing the removal of a teacher who has admitted he has an child pornography problem from one college but allowed him to go apply at another college without disclosing his problem to the new one?
sorry for the extreme comparrisson but i think it may wake you up

At some point in the future there is going to be a centralised database meaning if you exclude from one UK licensed casino you won't be able to play at any others. At the moment that isn't in place. That in itself will cause problems though when you have casinos now telling people who want to close an account for non responsible gaming issues, to self exclude.
 
Unfortunately, I don't think this will turn out in 32Red's favour. The UKGC have a clear view that the current SE procedures are not fit for purpose, and they do in fact require casinos to refund losses where they could reasonably have known that the player was a "problem gambler" to the extent that regardless of whether or not a formal SE request was made, they duty of care would dictate that they take the initiative and apply SE.

32Red have not helped themselves by REMOVING what was an effective and easy to use instant SE procedure and replacing it with a more complex procedure that required the player to jump through a number of hoops.
Since they brought in a system that required a formal request via email, I expect the UKGC will not look too kindly on them using a system that could quite easily "lose" these important requests. Demonstrating that the email was successfully sent would probably be enough for the UKGC.

Thanks to the UKGC rules, self exclusion complaints CANNOT be dealt with via any of the usual mediation channels, nor have the UKGC invested in the capacity to deal with such issues themselves.

Whilst 32Red may have put back the automated SE system, the issue is that by removing it they made it known in player circles that 32Red no longer has an automated SE system, and so there is no point in looking for it.

If in doubt, casinos should at least place a temporary TAB on an account whilst they guide the player through whatever process they have for registering and applying a formal SE.

The UKGC have said in the past that SE issues probably have to be dealt with by the courts because the ADRs have been specifically told not to get involved, so the expected route for arguing the case for refunds of losses due to lapses in RG procedures by operators would be to take the matter through the courts under the UKGC licencing rules.

Next year, the UKGC seeks to have a SE procedure that will apply a global block regardless of which operator receives the SE request or applies SE under their duty of care. Had this been in place already, this incident would not have occurred as the earlier loss of control and SE would have applied globally, and thus also have locked accounts at 32Red.

As well as refunding losses, casinos are not supposed to pay winnings to a player marked as SE; unfortunately it seems many casinos have abused this system by ONLY running SE checks when a player has won, and keeping quiet when the player has lost so that they get to keep the money. This has had the effect of bringing the whole SE system into disrepute, and some see it as just another way casinos can rip players off.
 
I see we are "beamed" back to April 2016. :rolleyes:

The latest LCCP came into effect on 6th April 2017 and the text has been changed, see highlighted section. How 32RED are still operating with only one part of that is certainly debatable.

View attachment 79904

The sections relating to this can be read here, starting page 49, particularly interesting is section 3.5.4, paragraph 5d:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


This SE business is getting "messier" by the day! :eek:

considering this is a publicly traded company....them not following actual regulations seems shocking to say the least:eek:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


Actually it can be done automatically "You will be able to request self-exclusion without contacting our Player Experience Team by using our automated service. This is available by clicking here."
 
considering this is a publicly traded company....them not following actual regulations seems shocking to say the least:eek:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


Actually it can be done automatically "You will be able to request self-exclusion without contacting our Player Experience Team by using our automated service. This is available by clicking here."

Yes, you get the form sent automatically to the registered email address when you click "here", but the account is not self-excluded yet. Only after you return the completed form to the indicated email will a support officer execute the SE manually.

So calling it automated is a bit rich, TBH and probably formulated that way to indicate they conform with the UKGC regulations.
 
But you all ignored my posts.

I made some very good points.

Like the point i made about the fact the OP obviously was aware of these flaws in 32red policy but he still chosen to play and lose a further 25k.

This is in my view a ploy and i am sorry but a dishonest attempt as we are well aware of the fact he has made that other thread about the MT group. And also an even earlier one on askgamblers too.

I am in no way defending 32red nor am i attacking or defending this OP. I am merely looking at the facts that we have currently got given by the OP.

there was clearly in my view "intent" on the OP part to purposely look for a loop hole in online casinos, and when they found a casino with such loop holes with the SE policy he then decided to continue after the fact.

So this is why i feel the investigation Mark will be doing will result in this being found out as well. We have the evidence to back it up being the previous thread on MT group and on ask gamblers.

I have also stated i am sorry to the OP which i truly am. And i also stated even before others that the OP needs to get help, close all accounts, block transactions with their bank, and to which the OP hasn't exactly said he will do this either. And that is not a good sign that the OP is actually willing to get help and do this, so then makes me question again the integrity of the OP's claim in the first place.

I am sorry for all parties involved but i am now favouring 32red that they do not refund because i am sorry to say feel it was a deliberate ploy by the OP who was well aware of their policy before he then decided to deposit a further 25k after the 6th June email and live chat session we still have not seen the transcript for.

It seems there will just be a lot of repeated replies, people repeating themselves, like myself until Mark and 32red have officially investigated this case and let us all know as to the outcome, so maybe it would be best to actually not post anymore replies and wait for Mark to respond to let us all know?

One last point. I have made it clear i am really sorry for the OP but in this case and after re reading all the posts over and over, it has just made me sway into 32reds side. And i am sorry but i am not a bad person, i am just reading the facts we have in front of us at this very time.
 
Ploy or not, it appears the casino was made aware that the OP had problems with gambling and wanted to close the account because of it and this was not acted upon. The casino allowed the OP to make several more deposits which they could have prevented by acting immediately on that initial and then subsequent correspondence from the OP.

Being a Company that is there to make profit comes with responsibility and failures by such Companies has consequences. The consequence is that they allowed a known to them problem gambler that asked for an account closure to continue to play and as such deposits should be refunded.

Shops know that there are shop lifters about. Some don't do anything about it, some employ security guards and install CCTV. Therefore some shops will have more shop lifting incidents than others and some will catch them whilst others don't.
 
Ploy or not, it appears the casino was made aware that the OP had problems with gambling and wanted to close the account because of it and this was not acted upon. The casino allowed the OP to make several more deposits which they could have prevented by acting immediately on that initial and then subsequent correspondence from the OP.

Being a Company that is there to make profit comes with responsibility and failures by such Companies has consequences. The consequence is that they allowed a known to them problem gambler that asked for an account closure to continue to play and as such deposits should be refunded.

Shops know that there are shop lifters about. Some don't do anything about it, some employ security guards and install CCTV. Therefore some shops will have more shop lifting incidents than others and some will catch them whilst others don't.

it is easy to understand that there will be people that agree and disagree and side with 1 side or the other. But lets just wait for the investigation outcome until we comment any further. Then we can see who was in the right or wrong in this case.
 
it is easy to understand that there will be people that agree and disagree and side with 1 side or the other. But lets just wait for the investigation outcome until we comment any further. Then we can see who was in the right or wrong in this case.

I guess that all of us can only comment on what is known so far. As I have said - and so have others - if what the OP has said is all there is to it and nothing has been omitted or (slightly) amended then 32red is on the back foot.

If, of course, it later transpires there is more to it that hasn't been revealed, I will the first one to back the casino up if they don't have cause to refund.

Whether we get to hear the final outcome, I am not so sure about either.
 
I guess that all of us can only comment on what is known so far. As I have said - and so have others - if what the OP has said is all there is to it and nothing has been omitted or (slightly) amended then 32red is on the back foot.

If, of course, it later transpires there is more to it that hasn't been revealed, I will the first one to back the casino up if they don't have cause to refund.

Whether we get to hear the final outcome, I am not so sure about either.

And I too will be the same i too will apologise but only if and when we get to know the outcome. But my view changed in the course of yesterday on this case anyway, at first i was not on either side. then after re reading and many replies later and reading other posters replies. Thus made me sway towards 32red side.

But I will of course still apologise if this case does result in a refund to the OP. I just then hope the OP takes on board all of the advice and blocks and bans all transactions and accounts.

But i actually feel we will see a new account on CM in the coming weeks with a very very similar case in another group. Just my gut feeling anyway.
 
I think what everyone should do is take away everything and look at just the responsible gaming part. Whether there was sneakiness or not.

The player told live chat he has serious gambling issues. He sent an email stating he had a serious gambling sickness. 32red read these chats and emails and did absolutely nothing.

Do you know how many accredited casino's I could go to and say even half of this and my account would be instantly closed? I would say almost all of them. I would know, trust me. I have said the words..I need a break im tired of gambling. And bang support closed my account and told me I am now excluded from their casino. I wasnt even saying anything about a problem but they took it this way. Its happened a couple times a couple years ago.


I feel as though some people are holding onto what 32red used to be and also in the back of their mind thinking of the exceptional Mark.

What matters is this player showed every sign of what a sick gambler is and even plead for help and 32red turned their back on him and instead thought of the financial gain. Do you know what that is in words? Preying on the vulnerable. Its irresponsible but it also crosses a line.

I get why people want to defend the casino because if the player did find a loophole and know what they were doing, its wrong. But 32red is a company. A company in the gambling industry where people can lose their entire lives. This is why there are gambling commissions to oversee casino's to make sure they dont prey on the vulnerable and sick. 32red did exactly that.

They must return the $25,000.

And we all know that the player will take this money and gamble it somewhere else. But that's not our problem or anyone else's. 32red has to be held accountable and I would go as far to say I would like to see them fined for this type of behavior. Its unacceptable.

@32red. You guys will always come ahead. Your slots are set at 88%-97%. You have every edge possible. Stop the nonsense. The delays in withdrawals, no more flushing, reducing bonuses and now preying on the vulnerable. What have you guys come to?
 
Last edited:
I think what everyone should do is take away everything and look at just the responsible gaming part. Whether there was sneakiness or not.

The player told live chat he has serious gambling issues. He sent an email stating he had a serious gambling sickness. 32red read these chats and emails and did absolutely nothing.

Do you know how many accredited casino's I could go to and say even half of this and my account would be instantly closed? I would say almost all of them. I would know, trust me. I have said the words..I need a break im tired of gambling. And bang support closed my account and told me I am now excluded from their casino. I wasnt even saying anything about a problem but they took it this way. Its happened a couple times a couple years ago.


I feel as though some people are holding onto what 32red used to be and also in the back of their mind thinking of the exceptional Mark.

What matters is this player showed every sign of what a sick gambler is and even plead for help and 32red turned their back on him and instead thought of the financial gain. Do you know what that is in words? Preying on the vulnerable. Its irresponsible but it also crosses a line.

I get why people want to defend the casino because if the player did find a loophole and know what they were doing, its wrong. But 32red is a company. A company in the gambling industry where people can lose their entire lives. This is why there are gambling commissions to oversee casino's to make sure they dont prey on the vulnerable and sick. 32red did exactly that.

They must return the $25,000.

And we all know that the player will take this money and gamble it somewhere else. But that's not our problem or anyone else's. 32red has to be held accountable and I would go as far to say I would like to see them fined for this type of behavior. Its unacceptable.

@32red. You guys will always come ahead. Your slots are set at 88%-97%. You have every edge possible. Stop the nonsense. The delays in withdrawals, no more flushing, reducing bonuses and now preying on the vulnerable. What have you guys come to?


have to agree with lockinlove....it is the casino's responsibility. period. they made a mistake.
if this were a bar...and i don't know if this example was brought up...but imagine walking into a bar...drinking the night away...and then telling the bartender straight up...you are an alcoholic....hmmmm....do you think the bartender would serve him more drinks....what do you think would happen????

addiction is addiction....is addiction.....
 
32Red is an multi-award winning casino reviewed by Casinomeister
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top