How does this fit with the regulation/ licensing of uk AWPs over the years?
How many fines have been issued for machines that could be emptied via a method and then played by unsuspecting [trusting] members of the public, who would effectively refill the machine's coffers?
Can you point me to the line in the legislation/rules where the ukgc refer to fines for slots that don't meet their rtp?
There's pages and pages about it here -
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Anyway, the burden of proof rests with those who are casting the aspersions here, I'm not the one saying that the moon is made of cheese, and if I was, a counter-argument wouldn't be 'Well prove to me that the moon isn't made of cheese'.
Besides all this, VS have already shown us what they do when they want to make more money out of a game, they just lower the RTP. Why would they bother with all this incredible cloak and daggers fuckery when they can just take the games at a different maths model and achieve the same result without, y'know, breaking the law.