I don't think you fully understood my point, both of you.
Lets take a hypothetical example:
Lets say we have a game called
"A" with
TRTP of 96%. The game has
70% of the TRTP allocated to base game wins that can pay up to 1000x bet (that includes the trigger for the bonus that pays 1000x bet) and the rest of the TRTP (
26%) is allocated
inside the bonus game that pays up to 4000x. And lets say there is a chance to get e retrigger of the bonus that will end up paying more than 5000x but it is so rare that the RTP allocated to that is 0,0001%.
Now
if a casino places a cap on any wins from this game "A" at 1000x, it is obvious that
the actual TRTP for the players will only be 70%, because they will only get paid for the base game wins and for the trigger of the bonus. The
casino will be
confiscating the bonus that is 26% of the TRTP.
Now a cap on any wins from this game "A"
at 1000x or a cap on any wins
at €100,000, are not the same thing. It depends on the max bet allowed.
If there is
only one bet size, the €100, then they are both the same and with a cap
at €100,000 all the players in our example will only get
70% RTP.
If the
bet size is €0.20 - €100, then with a cap
at €100,000 it depends on the player. For example a lowroller will have 96% RTP but
a highroller only betting max bet will get 70% RTP.
If the
bet size is €0.20 - €20, then with a cap
at €100,000 the max pay will be 5000x (20 bet x 5000x = 100,000). That includes base and bonus game pays inside the 96% and
that is the only legal scenario in our example. And it is legal becaouse even though it is possible to get a win over 5000x that chance is very small and the RTP allocated to that is 0,0001%.
I explained this best I could and I am sorry if it wasn't clear before.
But it is very serious, please
@Dan.Videoslots take a good look at it.