external image

Videoslots deactivated my account

Well at least Im honest about working for VS. There are maybe 25 accounts here or more working in the industry and nobody is official about it... Do you prefer me to have a secret account so you dont know where I work?

I haven't come across anyone else with an unofficial account speaking on behlaf of another casino in all honesty. I was under the impression such accounts needed validation...especially if you are going to be commenting on the internal affairs of a casino and not commenting on personal experiences with such.

As it stands with an unvalidated account it's shilling in my opinion.
 
@Chipkin9 If you're in the mood to quote rules, how about Forum Rule 1.1:

1.1 - No "Flaming": Please do not post any messages that harass, insult, belittle, threaten or flame another member or guest. Abusive behavior will not be tolerated and your account may be suspended. Please refrain from potty mouth language.

What did I write that was against the rules?

I'm not harrassing, belittling or flaming anyone...I'm asking a very valid question Dunover.

I guess an infraction is coming then :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
I could see working at VS and not wanting to be an official rep. He could the CEO, or the janitor privy to the watercooler gossip. He gave us info about the chases, and obviously some of our suggestions have been implemented. I do think the caveat is a good idea however.

I can't recall anytime he's misinformed us.

I can think of quite a few times, going back as far as the source of wealth thread, where he stated it was illegal for Videoslots to tell anyone they were asking for SOW for AML purposes, then tried to use the tipping off section of the act to justify his comments.

While he is obviously good to have around, he should either be a rep or not comment on specific things to do with the casino, as when he is wrong, customers have no comeback.
 
I can think of quite a few times, going back as far as the source of wealth thread, where he stated it was illegal for Videoslots to tell anyone they were asking for SOW for AML purposes, then tried to use the tipping off section of the act to justify his comments.

While he is obviously good to have around, he should either be a rep or not comment on specific things to do with the casino, as when he is wrong, customers have no comeback.
Totally correct. Can’t have your cake and eat it at the same time.
Pretty shitty you won’t say whom you are..
 
Leave Mr. Wild alone! Geeesh, bitch, bitch.......bitch! He doesnt give us "insider scoop". He has given information in how things are run, when we don't know. Nothing that any player with experience wouldn't give us. And Jazzy is right, he could be the president, or the secretary. Who cares! Now I'm going for a much needed nap :D
 
The VS rep including myself have already made it clear that this is my personal account and dont reflect Videoslots answers.
You act as a back seat rep for Videoslots and give every appearance of doing their bidding on matters that the reps do not wish to or are told not to post as officials upon
 
Leave Mr. Wild alone! Geeesh, bitch, bitch.......bitch! He doesnt give us "insider scoop". He has given information in how things are run, when we don't know. Nothing that any player with experience wouldn't give us. And Jazzy is right, he could be the president, or the secretary. Who cares! Now I'm going for a much needed nap :D
Pretty shady tbh. He’s either involved or he’s not
 
Leave Mr. Wild alone! Geeesh, bitch, bitch.......bitch! He doesnt give us "insider scoop". He has given information in how things are run, when we don't know. Nothing that any player with experience wouldn't give us. And Jazzy is right, he could be the president, or the secretary. Who cares! Now I'm going for a much needed nap :D
We know nothing about ‘mr wild’
If he’s in a casino capacity role then he or she or pronoun should be honest.
As a old school man I do like to know whom I’m taking to.
It’s common manners.
 
We know nothing about ‘mr wild’
If he’s in a casino capacity role then he or she or pronoun should be honest.
As a old school man I do like to know whom I’m taking to.
It’s common manners.
Ack, that nap. He is here as someone that plays the slots. People know he works there, and will answer generalized questions, that is it. We don't know who we are talking to at all when it comes to VS team. At least with wild, you are getting a name, a player, and a little bit of knowledge from working there. There are other VS, employees who also have a personal account here. Nothing shady at all.
 
I was logged out while playing tonight and my account deactivated. I have had no email, went to chat and was told my account was to be checked but they were unable to give me any further info. Worried now it will be closed like others on here. I won and withdrew over $3000 today.

Update I am back into my account and Videoslots have been amazing dealing with things, and very fair.
 
Last edited:
We know nothing about ‘mr wild’
If he’s in a casino capacity role then he or she or pronoun should be honest.
As a old school man I do like to know whom I’m taking to.
It’s common manners.

You know Who Mr. Wild is. He is someone who likes playing slots and works for VS. What else do you need to know about? He admitted he works for VS, do you really need a label of "official rep" beside his name? for what?
If you need any help with your personal account, you have team VS who is very active, more active than Casinomesiter sometimes :D, if you need an official statement from VS, you have team VS, so why do you need to see "official rep" sign beside MR. Wilds?

Sometimes he speaks about VS, not official, his opinion as an employee of VS, so what's wrong with it?
 
Leave Mr. Wild alone! Geeesh, bitch, bitch.......bitch! He doesnt give us "insider scoop". He has given information in how things are run, when we don't know. Nothing that any player with experience wouldn't give us. And Jazzy is right, he could be the president, or the secretary. Who cares! Now I'm going for a much needed nap :D

I think you're wrong on that with respect. He has given information before it was public knowledge, which is good, but shows it's not a personal opinion, but facts coming from Videoslots, just not officially, yet clearly is sanctioned or he would have been told to stop posting by the people above him, although I don't think there are that many of those.
 
You know Who Mr. Wild is. He is someone who likes playing slots and works for VS. What else do you need to know about? He admitted he works for VS, do you really need a label of "official rep" beside his name? for what?
If you need any help with your personal account, you have team VS who is very active, more active than Casinomesiter sometimes :D, if you need an official statement from VS, you have team VS, so why do you need to see "official rep" sign beside MR. Wilds?

Sometimes he speaks about VS, not official, his opinion as an employee of VS, so what's wrong with it?

All your comments can be applied the other way. There is a team of 5(?) officially acting for Videoslots on here, why do you need another staff member, giving conflicting (at times) information? Look through his recent posts and tell me he is posting as a player rather than on behalf of videoslots. If his posts aren't officially on behalf of VS then he should state that and not state them as fact.

As I say, he is a credit to the forum, but shouldn't be allowed to post on behalf of videoslots unless its confirmed he works for them for a start, then he could be an official staff member, even if he refers any account based queries to the other reps, if he doesn't want to get involved like that.
 
All your comments can be applied the other way. There is a team of 5(?) officially acting for Videoslots on here, why do you need another staff member, giving conflicting (at times) information? Look through his recent posts and tell me he is posting as a player rather than on behalf of videoslots. If his posts aren't officially on behalf of VS then he should state that and not state them as fact.

As I say, he is a credit to the forum, but shouldn't be allowed to post on behalf of videoslots unless its confirmed he works for them for a start, then he could be an official staff member, even if he refers any account based queries to the other reps, if he doesn't want to get involved like that.

It would be good if he has a title of "VS staff" for sure, but I don't see any problem even if he has not.
Can you name one example of the issue people has because he doesn't have title of "VS staff"?
What is going to make a difference? He admitted he works for VS, everybody know it, obviously he is not in the position of taking care of player's issue at VS, whether he has the title or not, what he is writing is not going to be different.

Sure, he gave a wrong information a couple of time such as how RTP works, but plenty of reps have given wrong information, so what you are saying is if MR. Wild had wrote the wrong RTP thing with "VS staff" title, it would have been much better, is that what you are saying? I don't see any difference. Whether he has a title or not, the fact that he needs to read the posts Transmonkey has written is not going to change.
 
It would be good if he has a title of "VS staff" for sure, but I don't see any problem even if he has not.
Can you name one example of the issue people has because he doesn't have title of "VS staff"?
What is going to make a difference? He admitted he works for VS, everybody know it, obviously he is not in the position of taking care of player's issue at VS, whether he has the title or not, what he is writing is not going to be different.

Sure, he gave a wrong information a couple of time such as how RTP works, but plenty of reps have given wrong information, so what you are saying is if MR. Wild had wrote the wrong RTP thing with "VS staff" title, it would have been much better, is that what you are saying? I don't see any difference. Whether he has a title or not, the fact that he needs to read the posts Transmonkey has written is not going to change.

If he gives you some 'general' advice that costs you money, and you say to Videoslots, hey I should qualify for this promotion as MrWild told me I would, and they say, tough, MrWild doesn't speak on behalf of Videoslots, would you still feel the same? As much as I disagree with him a lot of the time, I don't have any issue with him, or the fact he posts information that Team Videoslots should really be posting, however, he should abide by the rules, and be identified as a staff member there, rather than 'just a member'. He doesn't have to be a rep, but just having VS's staff member on his profile would give you some comeback if it were ever needed.
How would you feel if I started posting some information I hear about Videoslots from unofficial sources, presenting it as fact and implying I worked there with no one checking what I say be true?
 
If he gives you some 'general' advice that costs you money, and you say to Videoslots, hey I should qualify for this promotion as MrWild told me I would, and they say, tough, MrWild doesn't speak on behalf of Videoslots, would you still feel the same? As much as I disagree with him a lot of the time, I don't have any issue with him, or the fact he posts information that Team Videoslots should really be posting, however, he should abide by the rules, and be identified as a staff member there, rather than 'just a member'. He doesn't have to be a rep, but just having VS's staff member on his profile would give you some comeback if it were ever needed.
How would you feel if I started posting some information I hear about Videoslots from unofficial sources, presenting it as fact and implying I worked there with no one checking what I say be true?

Mr. Wilds clearly stated he is not talking about any personal account issue with an individual member.
You are right, if Mr. Wilds starts to get involved with any member individually who has a issue on their VS account like team VS is doing, that's going to be a problem, but he is not doing it, so there is no problem.

How would I feel if you started a rumor? I would go ask team VS about the rumor, and the good thing is I will get the answer within a few hours from them, if the rumor you wrote turned out to be untrue, what would happen? Nothing, just I would think you as somebody not that reliable maybe, but that would be it.
 
Mr. Wilds clearly stated he is not talking about any personal account issue with an individual member.
You are right, if Mr. Wilds starts to get involved with any member individually who has a issue on their VS account like team VS is doing, that's going to be a problem, but he is not doing it, so there is no problem.

How would I feel if you started a rumor? I would go ask team VS about the rumor, and the good thing is I will get the answer within a few hours from them, if the rumor you wrote turned out to be untrue, what would happen? Nothing, just I would think you as somebody not that reliable maybe, but that would be it.

ok, so out of the 2 things mentioned in the thread, can you show where Dan said he was wrong in the SOW thread, or where TeamVideoslots have said he was wrong about the RTP?
 
ok, so out of the 2 things mentioned in the thread, can you show where Dan said he was wrong in the SOW thread, or where TeamVideoslots have said he was wrong about the RTP?

Can you show the thread where the casino rep write something that is not correct and another rep from the same casino comes and say "this rep said wrong".

Every time the casino rep says something wrong, it's always members here that point out that information is not correct, some reps says "sorry", some reps don't say anything further more. When Mr. Wilds said something that is not correct I believe many members pointed out to him that is not correct, not much different when the person who has "casino staff" title said something wrong.

I'm not against MR. Wilds has a title of "VS staff". All I'm saying is whether he has a title or not, there is not going to be much difference.
Would it be better if he has a "VS staff" title? Absolutely. And I believe it is a good suggestion to ask him to ask Bryan about the title.
But just because he has not the title, let's not say he is doing something wrong, because he is not doing anything wrong. That's all.
 
Last edited:
What did I write that was against the rules?

I'm not harrassing, belittling or flaming anyone...I'm asking a very valid question Dunover.

I guess an infraction is coming then :rolleyes:

Well, you were being a dick about it - yeah that was flaming.

Mr. Wild is not a shill and it's his civilian account that a number of reps have. It is really no big deal. Geeze people.

What is deal with all of this aggression? It's like Videoslots has been turned into the whipping boy lately. Man, is Brexit causing some of you to go off the rails? It's ok - but chill out already.
 
Well, you were being a dick about it - yeah that was flaming.

Mr. Wild is not a shill and it's his civilian account that a number of reps have. It is really no big deal. Geeze people.

What is deal with all of this aggression? It's like Videoslots has been turned into the whipping boy lately. Man, is Brexit causing some of you to go off the rails? It's ok - but chill out already.
I don't know what you mean. Brexit's going really well and everyone's very upbeat about the whole situation
 
Well, you were being a dick about it - yeah that was flaming.

Mr. Wild is not a shill and it's his civilian account that a number of reps have. It is really no big deal. Geeze people.

What is deal with all of this aggression? It's like Videoslots has been turned into the whipping boy lately. Man, is Brexit causing some of you to go off the rails? It's ok - but chill out already.
Amen!
 
I have no problem with mr wild but think he must have some authority at VS, possibly the CEO.
I say that because of the nature and the knowledge behind some of the postings.
He has made a few duff comments which if an employee made, i would not allow them to post again
if I was the boss.
Sorry I mean no disrespect, just my opinion.
 
I really don't get it. You would think that people would be appreciative, and encourage more working in the Casino industry to join, chip in, and lend us their expertise and opinions, since their knowledge is more than relevant.
I guess people just really are on a "down with VS" crusade at the moment, and I really hope that it has run it's course. VS is tirelessly revamping and offering us new and innovative things, yet people are quick to complain and hold back the praise where it is due. Just my 2c.
 
Capture.webp
 
When I have been confused about stuff, and we know how frequent that can be. Lol. He has explained things in laymen s terms, and has also been able to diffuse me and allow perspective, with positive to kick in. I like Wild. Not to many can do that with me. So with those skills my gut tells me that he probably is higher up, but that is okay. But as with anyone I like, I get cranky when I hear bad stuff being said. Now back to smartcroatia. Whats been going on?
 
I really don't get it. You would think that people would be appreciative, and encourage more working in the Casino industry to join, chip in, and lend us their expertise and opinions, since their knowledge is more than relevant.
I guess people just really are on a "down with VS" crusade at the moment, and I really hope that it has run it's course. VS is tirelessly revamping and offering us new and innovative things, yet people are quick to complain and hold back the praise where it is due. Just my 2c.

"tirelessly revamping and offering us new and innovative things" which just happen to offer considerably less value than the things they replaced ? Don't think anyone could deny they have been on a mission to cutback rewards etc (and even game payouts for us UK players :( ) but ofc its far better marketing to change things and promote them as exciting new changes whilst offering less , rather than simply saying sorry guys we're cutting all your rewards and loyalty perks . Or simply keep quiet when there's no way of putting a positive spin on it like it's kind of difficut to say "hey guys , exciting changes we're lowering rtp on half our slots" :p
Nothing inherently wrong with some of their changes like clash of spins replacing casino race, except casino race used to pay out a lot more to their customers than clash of spins does
 
"tirelessly revamping and offering us new and innovative things" which just happen to offer considerably less value than the things they replaced ? Don't think anyone could deny they have been on a mission to cutback rewards etc (and even game payouts for us UK players :( ) but ofc its far better marketing to change things and promote them as exciting new changes whilst offering less , rather than simply saying sorry guys we're cutting all your rewards and loyalty perks . Or simply keep quiet when there's no way of putting a positive spin on it like it's kind of difficut to say "hey guys , exciting changes we're lowering rtp on half our slots :p
Nothing inherently wrong with some of their changes like clash of spins replacing casino race, except casino race used to pay out a lot more to their customers than clash of spins does

But I beg to differ. for example. My level is 56, So I get access to the silver wheel every 5 levels. The first silver wheel I had over a week ago I got a £150 cash bonus, no wager. Before the wheel of jackpots, you basically had races, which was pretty tiny depending how much playtime and luck you had, and the cashback, oh and those 10-15 freespins from the tuesday voucher, plus what ever you won in the free battles.

Now you have clash of spins, which if you get tonnes of playtime and luck then you can win a nice amount of spins from, More so than you might have won from the races in my opinion. That is if the spins are not all dead spins hahaha. The cashback although people have been moaning a lot about the fact that they think their cashback has been reduced to a lower %, I really can not say that I agree with, I check my cashback stats, and it is around the same as it always was and has been for the last 3+years.

So if anything the value is better because of the wheel of jackpots now for me anyway as I am a higher level. So minimum reward I can get from the wheel spin is £100 on silver wheel. In the past when I got a reward when I reached the level up every 5 levels it would usually either be a multiplier or around 25-50 freespins on a 0.10 slot. So the silver wheel is a huge huge improvement. Much much better in my opinion. That is my 2 cents anyway. I think people need to stop giving VS a hard time. Yes so what they lowered the RTP on some slot providers. I just do not play those slot providers at VS any longer, that is simple. I still play all the other slot providers though, and when I want to play the play n go and others with the lower RTP I play them elsewhere, LV, Rizk etc etc :)
 
Last edited:
Dream, Perfect time for a pun but did you just say something very positive about VS or am I dreaming (sorry know its a bad one :rolleyes: :p)

I said a lot of positive things about VS many times haha, maybe you missed those posts and only noticed some of my posts that came across in a more negative manner :P
 
But I beg to dither. for example. My level is 56, So I get access to the silver wheel every 5 levels. The first silver wheel I had over a week ago I got a £150 cash bonus, no wager. Before the wheel of jackpots, you basically had races, which was pretty tiny depending how much playtime and luck you had, and the cashback, oh and those 10-15 freespins from the tuesday voucher, plus what ever you won in the free battles.

Predictive text letting you down again by any chance? :p
 
Predictive text letting you down again by any chance? :p

How so?? Differ and Dither are pretty similar meanings? Yes? No?

differ
/ˈdɪfə/
verb
  1. be unlike or dissimilar.
    "the second set of data differed from the first"
    synonyms: vary, be different, be unlike, be dissimilar, be distinguishable, diverge More
    • disagree.
      "he differed from his contemporaries in ethical matters"
      synonyms: disagree, fail to agree, dissent, be at variance, be in dispute, be in opposition, take issue, conflict, clash, cross swords, lock horns, be at each other's throats; More

dither
/ˈdɪðə/
verb
  1. 1.
    be indecisive.
    "I can't bear people who dither"
    synonyms: hesitate, falter, waver, teeter, vacillate, oscillate, fluctuate, change one's mind, be in two minds, be ambivalent, be indecisive, be unsure, be undecided; More

  2. 2.
    add white noise to (a digital recording) to reduce distortion of low-amplitude signals.
noun
  1. 1.
    INFORMAL
    indecisive behaviour.
    "after months of dither ministers had still not agreed"
  2. 2.
    a state of agitation.
    "all of a dither, he prophesied instant chaos"
so maybe I should have used Differ :P
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top