Videoslots deactivated my account

Well at least Im honest about working for VS. There are maybe 25 accounts here or more working in the industry and nobody is official about it... Do you prefer me to have a secret account so you dont know where I work?

I haven't come across anyone else with an unofficial account speaking on behlaf of another casino in all honesty. I was under the impression such accounts needed validation...especially if you are going to be commenting on the internal affairs of a casino and not commenting on personal experiences with such.

As it stands with an unvalidated account it's shilling in my opinion.
 
@Chipkin9 If you're in the mood to quote rules, how about Forum Rule 1.1:

1.1 - No "Flaming": Please do not post any messages that harass, insult, belittle, threaten or flame another member or guest. Abusive behavior will not be tolerated and your account may be suspended. Please refrain from potty mouth language.

What did I write that was against the rules?

I'm not harrassing, belittling or flaming anyone...I'm asking a very valid question Dunover.

I guess an infraction is coming then :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
@Mr Wild appears to be a respectable, useful member.

There’s a lot of people leaping on everything Videoslots related recently, and I can’t see any reason for it.

If other casinos had staff here, informally or not, I can’t see them getting negative posts. It’s a benefit, not a negative.
 
I could see working at VS and not wanting to be an official rep. He could the CEO, or the janitor privy to the watercooler gossip. He gave us info about the chases, and obviously some of our suggestions have been implemented. I do think the caveat is a good idea however.

I can't recall anytime he's misinformed us.

I can think of quite a few times, going back as far as the source of wealth thread, where he stated it was illegal for Videoslots to tell anyone they were asking for SOW for AML purposes, then tried to use the tipping off section of the act to justify his comments.

While he is obviously good to have around, he should either be a rep or not comment on specific things to do with the casino, as when he is wrong, customers have no comeback.
 
I can think of quite a few times, going back as far as the source of wealth thread, where he stated it was illegal for Videoslots to tell anyone they were asking for SOW for AML purposes, then tried to use the tipping off section of the act to justify his comments.

While he is obviously good to have around, he should either be a rep or not comment on specific things to do with the casino, as when he is wrong, customers have no comeback.
Totally correct. Can’t have your cake and eat it at the same time.
Pretty shitty you won’t say whom you are..
 
But he's talking as himself rather than as a rep of the casino. He makes a few assumptions, and says a few things which may be wrong. Which is why if you want to check the casino's opinion or position, you ask the rep, rather than the bloke.
 
Leave Mr. Wild alone! Geeesh, bitch, bitch.......bitch! He doesnt give us "insider scoop". He has given information in how things are run, when we don't know. Nothing that any player with experience wouldn't give us. And Jazzy is right, he could be the president, or the secretary. Who cares! Now I'm going for a much needed nap :D
 
The VS rep including myself have already made it clear that this is my personal account and dont reflect Videoslots answers.
You act as a back seat rep for Videoslots and give every appearance of doing their bidding on matters that the reps do not wish to or are told not to post as officials upon
 
Leave Mr. Wild alone! Geeesh, bitch, bitch.......bitch! He doesnt give us "insider scoop". He has given information in how things are run, when we don't know. Nothing that any player with experience wouldn't give us. And Jazzy is right, he could be the president, or the secretary. Who cares! Now I'm going for a much needed nap :D
Pretty shady tbh. He’s either involved or he’s not
 
Leave Mr. Wild alone! Geeesh, bitch, bitch.......bitch! He doesnt give us "insider scoop". He has given information in how things are run, when we don't know. Nothing that any player with experience wouldn't give us. And Jazzy is right, he could be the president, or the secretary. Who cares! Now I'm going for a much needed nap :D
We know nothing about ‘mr wild’
If he’s in a casino capacity role then he or she or pronoun should be honest.
As a old school man I do like to know whom I’m taking to.
It’s common manners.
 
We know nothing about ‘mr wild’
If he’s in a casino capacity role then he or she or pronoun should be honest.
As a old school man I do like to know whom I’m taking to.
It’s common manners.
Ack, that nap. He is here as someone that plays the slots. People know he works there, and will answer generalized questions, that is it. We don't know who we are talking to at all when it comes to VS team. At least with wild, you are getting a name, a player, and a little bit of knowledge from working there. There are other VS, employees who also have a personal account here. Nothing shady at all.
 
I was logged out while playing tonight and my account deactivated. I have had no email, went to chat and was told my account was to be checked but they were unable to give me any further info. Worried now it will be closed like others on here. I won and withdrew over $3000 today.

Update I am back into my account and Videoslots have been amazing dealing with things, and very fair.
 
Last edited:
We know nothing about ‘mr wild’
If he’s in a casino capacity role then he or she or pronoun should be honest.
As a old school man I do like to know whom I’m taking to.
It’s common manners.

You know Who Mr. Wild is. He is someone who likes playing slots and works for VS. What else do you need to know about? He admitted he works for VS, do you really need a label of "official rep" beside his name? for what?
If you need any help with your personal account, you have team VS who is very active, more active than Casinomesiter sometimes :D, if you need an official statement from VS, you have team VS, so why do you need to see "official rep" sign beside MR. Wilds?

Sometimes he speaks about VS, not official, his opinion as an employee of VS, so what's wrong with it?
 
Leave Mr. Wild alone! Geeesh, bitch, bitch.......bitch! He doesnt give us "insider scoop". He has given information in how things are run, when we don't know. Nothing that any player with experience wouldn't give us. And Jazzy is right, he could be the president, or the secretary. Who cares! Now I'm going for a much needed nap :D

I think you're wrong on that with respect. He has given information before it was public knowledge, which is good, but shows it's not a personal opinion, but facts coming from Videoslots, just not officially, yet clearly is sanctioned or he would have been told to stop posting by the people above him, although I don't think there are that many of those.
 
You know Who Mr. Wild is. He is someone who likes playing slots and works for VS. What else do you need to know about? He admitted he works for VS, do you really need a label of "official rep" beside his name? for what?
If you need any help with your personal account, you have team VS who is very active, more active than Casinomesiter sometimes :D, if you need an official statement from VS, you have team VS, so why do you need to see "official rep" sign beside MR. Wilds?

Sometimes he speaks about VS, not official, his opinion as an employee of VS, so what's wrong with it?

All your comments can be applied the other way. There is a team of 5(?) officially acting for Videoslots on here, why do you need another staff member, giving conflicting (at times) information? Look through his recent posts and tell me he is posting as a player rather than on behalf of videoslots. If his posts aren't officially on behalf of VS then he should state that and not state them as fact.

As I say, he is a credit to the forum, but shouldn't be allowed to post on behalf of videoslots unless its confirmed he works for them for a start, then he could be an official staff member, even if he refers any account based queries to the other reps, if he doesn't want to get involved like that.
 
All your comments can be applied the other way. There is a team of 5(?) officially acting for Videoslots on here, why do you need another staff member, giving conflicting (at times) information? Look through his recent posts and tell me he is posting as a player rather than on behalf of videoslots. If his posts aren't officially on behalf of VS then he should state that and not state them as fact.

As I say, he is a credit to the forum, but shouldn't be allowed to post on behalf of videoslots unless its confirmed he works for them for a start, then he could be an official staff member, even if he refers any account based queries to the other reps, if he doesn't want to get involved like that.

It would be good if he has a title of "VS staff" for sure, but I don't see any problem even if he has not.
Can you name one example of the issue people has because he doesn't have title of "VS staff"?
What is going to make a difference? He admitted he works for VS, everybody know it, obviously he is not in the position of taking care of player's issue at VS, whether he has the title or not, what he is writing is not going to be different.

Sure, he gave a wrong information a couple of time such as how RTP works, but plenty of reps have given wrong information, so what you are saying is if MR. Wild had wrote the wrong RTP thing with "VS staff" title, it would have been much better, is that what you are saying? I don't see any difference. Whether he has a title or not, the fact that he needs to read the posts Transmonkey has written is not going to change.
 
It would be good if he has a title of "VS staff" for sure, but I don't see any problem even if he has not.
Can you name one example of the issue people has because he doesn't have title of "VS staff"?
What is going to make a difference? He admitted he works for VS, everybody know it, obviously he is not in the position of taking care of player's issue at VS, whether he has the title or not, what he is writing is not going to be different.

Sure, he gave a wrong information a couple of time such as how RTP works, but plenty of reps have given wrong information, so what you are saying is if MR. Wild had wrote the wrong RTP thing with "VS staff" title, it would have been much better, is that what you are saying? I don't see any difference. Whether he has a title or not, the fact that he needs to read the posts Transmonkey has written is not going to change.

If he gives you some 'general' advice that costs you money, and you say to Videoslots, hey I should qualify for this promotion as MrWild told me I would, and they say, tough, MrWild doesn't speak on behalf of Videoslots, would you still feel the same? As much as I disagree with him a lot of the time, I don't have any issue with him, or the fact he posts information that Team Videoslots should really be posting, however, he should abide by the rules, and be identified as a staff member there, rather than 'just a member'. He doesn't have to be a rep, but just having VS's staff member on his profile would give you some comeback if it were ever needed.
How would you feel if I started posting some information I hear about Videoslots from unofficial sources, presenting it as fact and implying I worked there with no one checking what I say be true?
 
If he gives you some 'general' advice that costs you money, and you say to Videoslots, hey I should qualify for this promotion as MrWild told me I would, and they say, tough, MrWild doesn't speak on behalf of Videoslots, would you still feel the same? As much as I disagree with him a lot of the time, I don't have any issue with him, or the fact he posts information that Team Videoslots should really be posting, however, he should abide by the rules, and be identified as a staff member there, rather than 'just a member'. He doesn't have to be a rep, but just having VS's staff member on his profile would give you some comeback if it were ever needed.
How would you feel if I started posting some information I hear about Videoslots from unofficial sources, presenting it as fact and implying I worked there with no one checking what I say be true?

Mr. Wilds clearly stated he is not talking about any personal account issue with an individual member.
You are right, if Mr. Wilds starts to get involved with any member individually who has a issue on their VS account like team VS is doing, that's going to be a problem, but he is not doing it, so there is no problem.

How would I feel if you started a rumor? I would go ask team VS about the rumor, and the good thing is I will get the answer within a few hours from them, if the rumor you wrote turned out to be untrue, what would happen? Nothing, just I would think you as somebody not that reliable maybe, but that would be it.
 
Mr. Wilds clearly stated he is not talking about any personal account issue with an individual member.
You are right, if Mr. Wilds starts to get involved with any member individually who has a issue on their VS account like team VS is doing, that's going to be a problem, but he is not doing it, so there is no problem.

How would I feel if you started a rumor? I would go ask team VS about the rumor, and the good thing is I will get the answer within a few hours from them, if the rumor you wrote turned out to be untrue, what would happen? Nothing, just I would think you as somebody not that reliable maybe, but that would be it.

ok, so out of the 2 things mentioned in the thread, can you show where Dan said he was wrong in the SOW thread, or where TeamVideoslots have said he was wrong about the RTP?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top