- Joined
- Jan 8, 2014
- Location
- glasgow scotland
The conundrum here is that if instead of reversing the $100 gained from free money, the player withdrew and then immediately redeposited that same $100, they would have no cashout restriction at all. Doing things this way is good for the player, but bad for the casino in that two additional costs are involved (2x transaction fees for $100). Other casinos are far worse at lumbering themselves with extra costs as they INSIST that players fully withdraw, rather than reverse.
In a mathematical sense, it makes no difference whether the player reverses the $100 or redeposit it afresh after withdrawal, in both cases you have a WR free $100 in play on the same games. For players therefore, they should ALWAYS withdraw cleared max cashout winnings from a free chip and redeposit, rather than reverse in an attempt to at best double the amount.
That applies to every bonus with a max cashout at every casino going then. Many casinos have a MAX cashout on free bonuses so in reality you are saying they should just scrap it and let people withdraw as much as they want as they could just redeposit and win it anyway.
You are forgetting the fact that the max cashout means if a player wins $1000 they can only cashout $200 and will lose the other $800 . If the player wants to deposit the $200 back in then let them win as much as they want as they are then at least a depositing player but reversing the original withdrawal from a ND bonus is entirely different from making a fresh deposit.