- Joined
- May 22, 2012
It's banned by casino operators who don't understand how to run a casino.
Looking more and more like you were fortunate to get paid when you ran the 1777% SUB through.
It's banned by casino operators who don't understand how to run a casino.
Looking more and more like you were fortunate to get paid when you ran the 1777% SUB through.
Well it was evens for you in effect, you failed one and succeeded one, overall making about 600.
Eh?
It only cost £100 per attempt, that was made it so crazily EV+
£100 deposit gave a £1777 bonus for a £1877 bankroll with a maximum cashout of 0.5x the bonus (£888) + deposit back (£100) + comp points (£30 or more).
Over £1000 withdrawable from a £100 deposit if you beat it first time, and it was basically impossible NOT to beat it at least one in ten attempts, so it would always be profitable.
Hi guys,
i also hoping that Tropica can be an accredited rival casino but after experienced the next confiscating winnings on a german player my hope is lost somewhere in a black hole.
Hope that the player will register here and will report his story. That is what he wanted to do. But i'm involved in his issue.
short report:
A german player registered and made 2 deposits. First deposit (KK) of €100 he lost. On second deposit of €200 (KK) he pushed his balance up to €1500.
He played without bonus and played roulette. His bets was between €5 and €8 on different numbers, so he placed between €45 and €50 and was lucky to push his balance. This is happened within a few minutes. Now after a short time his account was flagged from security system and was locked.
Account is under review and so on. The reason should be the high risk bets and that he used the martingale system.
He played without bonus, so he was free in playing games and placing bets.
After i contacted casino because he got no response from the department, i got the following response.
MARTINGALE APPLIES TO ROULETTE. ROULETTE IS NOT ALLOWED WHEN PLAYING WITH BONUSES AND THEREFORE IT IS LOGICAL THAT IT APPLIES WITHOUT A BONUS BEEN ACTIVE.
Am i wrong or don't understand ? where please is the logical ?
The casino has table limits, so higher bets are allowed and how can one except that a general bonus term (using martingale system) is allso affected if one play without bonus ?
what is your opinion ?
Fact is that they reopened his casino account a short time to withdraw his deposits. Player withdraw his deposits but they have removed the rest of €1.200 before (Balance was only €300)
E-mail correspondence between player and casino is also a joke.
Now in the menatime of writing here i received another statement from CSR. But what they stated about casinomeister i think it would be better to write it Bryan personally.
@Bryan
will send you a pm (in german)
it will interest you
I believe their CSR is really on crack otherwise i can't explain their own interpretations of rules or management decisions.
Well I'm certainly happy I bumped this thread IMO Bryan needs to rogue Tropica! That's the second player that hasn't been paid and I'm sure there will be more to come.
I am afraid Tropica are lying through their teeth and will continue to do so!
I asked them about this case and this is the response I received:
Thank you for your interest in the casinomeister case. We have liaised
with Bryan and Nifty and stated our case 2 weeks ago with no reply from
either.
We will not be discussing the matter with any third parties.
For the record, we chose not to be part of Casinomeister anymore,
because they would not allow us to become accredited. (DUH!!! > my comment)
You are welcome to play here and test our service, rewards, offers etc.
We do run a good operation and only people abusing our generosity have a
poor experience.
We have liaised with Bryan and Nifty
no reply from either.
they would not allow us to become accredited.
Nifty? Why?
I did receive an email and have yet to reply.
I wanted to see how things progressed. I have seen enough.
When I respond I will consider posting the email, although I can't post the email I received without permission.
Balthazar....apparently Duwayne considered me to be fair minded and likely to give him a fair hearing,which I am and did. I've spoken to him several times over the past 12 months so that might be a factor also.
Is Duwayne still working for them or not? Last time it was mentionned the answer was quite ambiguous (ie: "yes but no...").
deliberately signed "D" to make us think it was still Duwayne.
I did receive an email and have yet to reply.
I wanted to see how things progressed. I have seen enough.
When I respond I will consider posting the email, although I can't post the email I received without permission.
Balthazar....apparently Duwayne considered me to be fair minded and likely to give him a fair hearing,which I am and did. I've spoken to him several times over the past 12 months so that might be a factor also.
I did receive an email and have yet to reply.
I wanted to see how things progressed. I have seen enough.
When I respond I will consider posting the email, although I can't post the email I received without permission.
Balthazar....apparently Duwayne considered me to be fair minded and likely to give him a fair hearing,which I am and did. I've spoken to him several times over the past 12 months so that might be a factor also.
Fair enough but the casino is accusing both you and Bryan of inaction which I feel is unlikely from what I understand about both of you.
Yes, I see your point there.
I've been waiting to see how it all turned out with the $7k issue, and I had a feeling based on past experience that this might be the tip of the iceberg.....often one complaint tends to become several either via aggrieved players using Google, or some kind of change in management policy. I'm glad I waited, given the horrendous confiscation of non-bonus winnings due to "pattern betting".
I'm tempted to put an offer to Tropica.....allow me to gather a couple of knowledgable members from here and form an advisory team with a goal of turning their casino into a trustworthy big player in the industry, with a nice paycheck for us if we meet our goals etc. I think its doable, but they'll never go for it. I actually think a lot of casinos would benefit from such a panel/team with a passion for improving the industry for both players and casinos.
I will post the email when I've sent it.
As for reps discussing cases via PM with respected members, it happens on occasion, but personal details of the player involved are NOT shared. I also engaged with the former Tropica rep over the issues involved in an earlier case, but I received no personal details of any players involved, just a more detailed discussion of what the issues were from their side, seeking understanding and suggestions on how to proceed. I presume this is the level of discussion they had with Nifty.
I don't know how to word this without sounding like an asshole. This is pure curiosity.
Why would a casino talk about any case with a member of a forum in private? (that wasn't about them) The way you word things, sometimes it seems like you are more than a member.
Especially "Duwayne considered me to be fair minded and likely to give him a fair hearing". What does he care if one forum member gives him a fair hearing?
Again, this is just curiosity (or me being nosey, NOT asshole-ish).
As for reps discussing cases via PM with respected members, it happens on occasion, but personal details of the player involved are NOT shared. I also engaged with the former Tropica rep over the issues involved in an earlier case, but I received no personal details of any players involved, just a more detailed discussion of what the issues were from their side, seeking understanding and suggestions on how to proceed. I presume this is the level of discussion they had with Nifty.
I asked them about this case and this is the response I received:
Thank you for your interest in the casinomeister case. We have liaised
with Bryan and Nifty and stated our case 2 weeks ago with no reply from
either.
We will not be discussing the matter with any third parties.