- Joined
- Jul 19, 2011
- Location
- United Kingdom
Have you PM'D him and asked.
Yay its my twin paul peas in a pod us
Have you PM'D him and asked.
No but there are plenty of (usually) new members who are attempting to defraud casinos.Is there a core group on this site..that maybe work from website that try to attack anything negative towards a casino they like? Hmmm
No but there are plenty of (usually) new members who are attempting to defraud casinos.
I don't see anyone trying to defraud a casino..can you maybe clarify above statement?
Unlikely. Paul's witty and makes good pointsYay its my twin paul peas in a pod us
And im just a fancy Bear.
And also an unpaid Netent shill.
Whether Kroffe is a pet bearClarify what? I made a statement which is factual. We get loads of new members on here attempting to defraud casinos. What else would you like me to clarify?
Most usually expect people to deal such issues with casino itself and if needed, ADR or other complaint service. There's no point for any rep to come state something what is clear already and probably don't change a lot if rep confirms that deposits will not be refunded.
When you have valid claim that some mistake is made which judge it right to refund deposit, it get handled very easily without starting argue about it in public forums where rep anyway can't state almost anything about details.
Use normal complaint processes and come inform us about outcome. If you were told already that refund will not happen, it for sure don't happen any easier when complaining all over internet about it, especially when there's no any violation made against regulations like pointed out some pages ago.
He has already said the ADR ruled against him.
How did the ADR adjudicate on an SE issue I wonder...
Can you really trust any ADR? Come on..you know the score.How did the ADR adjudicate on an SE issue I wonder...
Can you really trust any ADR? Come on..you know the score.
Sorry, missed that one. Maybe just time to accept outcome when realizing it have been same everywhere. Especially when there's only been normal gameplay where player just using planned gambling budget...
exactly, just so people can see historic proof of it being done before, this is the OP's complaint to thepogg in October 2018, see the similarities. Thepogg ruled against him that time like the ADR has this time.To be fair the fact of the ADR ruling had to be dragged out of the OP, several pages in... Didn't think it significant enough to mention initially.. jeez
The ADR refused on the grounds of exclude being before December 2018..so therefore wasn't applicable...what i haven't had, is proof 32red exclusion was carried out in december..and why wasn't excluded players ported over to there new rg policy?
Silence...
Than is when kindred claim that platform exclusion became active...no evidence provided of courseYou said you excluded Feb 2018, why would they provide proof you excluded in December?
Why? They ruled against me.Can you post a screenshot of the ADR decision email, minus any personal details