Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
All Games
Popular Bonus Filters
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Popular News Sections
About Us
I didn’t know this but it makes sense.The lower RTP is not the only nerfing going on. The average slot RTP is now calculated over billions of spins instead of millions.
Burning notes would take longer than playing the newer games.
This isn't a recent development - if we go back a decade, slots like Immortal Romance had billions of combinations in the base game alone. The only change there is that this is now disclosed publicly rather than in a technical document somewhere. As a reference, compensated machines had to hit their target within 10,000 spins (category C or D) or 100,000 spins (category B3 or B4) back in 2007 - and random non-scripted machines are much less predictable.The lower RTP is not the only nerfing going on. The average slot RTP is now calculated over billions of spins instead of millions.
Yeah, the AWP analogy is prudent here because you allude to the £100 jackpots (now) making the games unrecognisable from days of 20p spins and £6 for example, where the player would have some level of turnover if approaching them with say 25 credits or a fiver in hand. Mind you, even then the makers incorporated the 'streak' element with jackpot repeaters, enhanced pay (streak) periods and on low-techs, holds after wins to get around the single-credit pay limits. But the player effect was nothing compared to the weighting of online slots toward multi-thousand times bet wins.This isn't a recent development - if we go back a decade, slots like Immortal Romance had billions of combinations in the base game alone. The only change there is that this is now disclosed publicly rather than in a technical document somewhere. As a reference, compensated machines had to hit their target within 10,000 spins (category C or D) or 100,000 spins (category B3 or B4) back in 2007 - and random non-scripted machines are much less predictable.
Saying that, the curve to get to that RTP has most definitely changed - not only because of the RTP cuts, but because of how stupidly top heavy streamer slots have become.
If we think back 10 years, even on a higher variance game, you'd be pretty unlucky not to get 50% RTP after 250 spins, and 75% after 1000 spins - the monster pays were suitably rare so while you'd win some and lose some, it was rare for it to go apocalyptic and go straight down. Additionally after 1000 spins you'd expect five to ten bonus rounds.
With bonus frequency on some providers now being measured in hours, the base game RTP being reduced to peanuts to compensate (for non-bonus buy jurisdictions like the UK) and a massive increase in RTP allocated to those monster pays, that curve is going to get pretty vertical - it's more like playing a lottery, 1 in 500 to win a ticket, and maybe 1 in 25 to then win the decent prizes.
People were never particularly good at judging variance and risk in the first place, that's particularly true in the current climate. It reminds me of the dying stages of the fruit machine market - the players and operators were extracting so much value out of the machine, the casual only ever saw the vertical downwards... at least they do have a chance to win here, however astronomical those odds may be.
At a rough guess (given the general tone of your posting - which generally consists of claims that you have been summarily buggeredI dont know how im affected since i get absolute worst playtime , rtp and feature hit rate at winz ..
At a rough guess (given the general tone of your posting - which generally consists of claims that you have been summarily buggered
on quite literally every single session of slotting in your whole damn life), I would confidently hazard a guess of "somewhat adversely"....
Actually, that's not funny at all. Well...maybe just a little bit...![]()
I would imagine they think that not many of their customers know what an RTP is, and they are probably correct. But I would have done exactly the same as you had I received the questionnaire (because that’s the very reason I stopped playing there too).Unibet recently sent me a questionnaire regarding why I have stopped playing there, in the section on casino experience there were about 10 different reasons provided, not one was about reduced rtp, so I used the 'other' reasons box.
You have to wonder how earnest they are to find out the real reasons why players may have left if they don't include as an option a major negative change in slot payouts.
Bit of Turps will take that right off ;-phaha they've sent me another email today, an actual offer, deposit £100 notes and receive 50 high-value spins on 'powernudge', and yet nowhere in the email does it say what stake the spins actually are.
And no doubt it's a 94% slot...
Players with a sweet tooth will love the big wins and sugary treats on offer … especially since a whopping win of 5000x the bet could be triggered. [yes that's the bit you won't blinking tell me]
They must think I've got gambling addicted muppet written all over my forehead!![]()
![]()
OK, we know for the last 18 months developers have been coaxed to provide alternative (invariably lower!) maths models to online casinos. Generally they have and should inform you of product changes, although not always and in the case of Coral, having slots with nerfed RTP's that were not reflected in the game list RTP's which claimed the higher factory settings.
I think that when players see a reduction of say 2% from 96 to 94% they see the difference as not that significant. Alas, it is and very much so as when you take into account recycling of winnings, that figure has an exponential effect on your average playtime. In this example, by around 30%!!
We all have our 'usual' deposit amounts and stakes, say £50 at 40p spins. Obviously there's no accounting here for variance, just the long term fact that every spin will on average cost you 4% of its value, the house edge on a 96% slot. This video explains how my RTP spin calculator works and how to simply enter your deposit, stake and RTP of your chosen game to compare average playtime/spin quantities you can expect.
*Disclaimer - for now this is embedded in a specific page on my website which as you will see, as an approved CM webmeister, I always have an indirect link to in my signature anyway. I will however, endeavour to get this embedded in a post in this thread if possible ASAP so forum members can use it from the forum!
**This video is not age-gated as it's news/informational and has no gambling involved.
Im afraid they call it Responsible gamblingUnibet is garbage if such practices are going on. But ive noticed something while registering in a casino in Holland. Auto-play disabled. Bet limits in effect. Bonus buy capped.
The trend towards nearly all developers offering alternative RTP models (meaning lower to ridculously low) began in earnest back around that time and also the amount of online casinos willing to offer reduced RTP models.This change of RTP you talk about here, did it happen around 2020-21, or you mean you noticed this change only in that period?
The trend towards nearly all developers offering alternative RTP models (meaning lower to ridculously low) began in earnest back around that time and also the amount of online casinos willing to offer reduced RTP models.
To be honest, the enhanced RTP Prag slots on Stake never did anything for me so I’ve avoided them since.Seems like the Stake "enhanced RTP" Pragmatic rollout has ground to a halt, at least for now, the last 98% slot release being Lucky Phoenix.
Im afraid they call it Responsible gambling
All the limitations you mentioned are - luckily - unknown to me, yet we need to remember that im from Poland and right now we have no official (and licensed) online casino in here.
So limitation is one thing, but banning it is even worse![]()