- Joined
- Oct 11, 2006
- Location
- USA
The Red MAGA
Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
All Games
Popular Bonus Filters
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Popular News Sections
About Us
You're still on this?
here is some ammo for you from national paralegal
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
The Dems are keeping impeachment quiet because it does not poll well and they want to win seats in the mid terms.
Is this enough?
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
No, if Trump did something w/ the Russians the GOP would have no choice.
imo, revisiting the tax cuts means undoing tax cuts.
We already had the ACA conversation a couple weeks ago.
What's with the hysteria?
Taking down a sitting president is not good for the country.
Did they not impeach a sitting president not to long ago over a lie about sexual relations?
How dismissive of you and typical...your question of “you’re still on this” demonstrates of how badly Fox News, the president and his henchpeople have made it seem so normal that this has happened in the USA and it’s a so what? So
...this president has made it seem so normal that conspiring with a foreign government is ok.
What’s the fuss? All normal to choose Russia over your country. Like I said had obama sided with Russia in Helsinki we would have to peel all of you off of the ceiling. The hysteria that a tan suit caused was something but this would send you all into a tail spin. But nope. It’s all normal.
But maybe you’d rather be Russian than a democrat. Oh well.
Collusion is not a crime.
But treason is a crime. conspiracy to defraud the United States is a crime.
And working with a foreign power to sway an election falls under defrauding the Usa. Obstruction...
Election hacking, wire hacking.
Thankfully the no collusion claim means absolutely nothing cuz you don’t fight those kind of claims on twitter or on tv. You fight It in a court of law.
And mueller is getting to that.
Do you listen to anyone other than Tucker?
Or hannity?
Maybe time to resurrect this thread because I just came across this article from CNN on my newsfeed, titled: "Finally, Devin Nunes admits what his charade is all about". Apparently, he got recorded on tape while talking to some donors.
Should be clear to all now that this a Mr. T and GOP charade. Nunes speaks about protecting MR. T. Why does he need protection in Nunes' view if Mr. T is sooooo innocent as he relentlessly claims.
View attachment 93838
Still circumventing the issue slotplayer: continuing the Trump Agenda is not a valid reason to clear/protect the president (I would say it borders on criminal conduct in this instance). And do you really think there are no serious suspicions? Think again. CNN is not the only source, there are many.
Harry's excerpt was from a CNN opinion piece.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


I've been privileged enough to be granted an audience with the Great Q'anon, he's real
View attachment 93913




You know what'd be even funnier than that? If Q decided to point the Anons attention in a different direction. Like the European Union. The level of indignation would probably start a new ice age. heh heh heh...Would be funny if this Qanon is some 15yo swedish guy trolling people. People believe all kinds of crazy stuff it seems![]()
You know what'd be even funnier than that? If Q decided to point the Anons attention in a different direction. Like the European Union. The level of indignation would probably start a new ice age. heh heh heh...
oh please let that happen. it can be a weird source of entertainment watching crazy people doing their thing.
2.30 in 2nd vid "there hasn't been any... none evidence yet."![]()

2.30 in 2nd vid "there hasn't been any... none evidence yet."![]()
@slotplayer I can see why the CNN reporter specifically gave her most of the attention though.
Also, noticed some anons recently decided to edit out the sound on porn vids and replace the sound with 'red pill' voice overs, and upload to porn sites. I've no doubt i'm not the most mature person you'll ever meet, but it was hard not to laugh at seeing a guy drilling away like his life depended on it to the voice of some guy giving a lecture on the soviet union.
@slotplayer I can see why the CNN reporter specifically gave her most of the attention though.
This is a PERFECT example of how truly harmful Main Stream Media's Mocking Bird Agenda is to the world. It keeps folks out of touch with reality.
I don't think you have any idea how amazingly talented and dedicated Anons are. Anons didn't seek Q out. Q went to them for help. Not because Anons are malleable or prone to manipulation, but because they are relentless and extremely effective at working together to gather and disseminate information from open source data. It started with a few thousand on 4chan and jumped to Reddit to accommodate rapid growth in participation. Q made a final move to 8 chan due to security issues. Now there are over a million Anons that actively participate. This isn't a small group of brainwashed basement dwellers.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Anons are a perfect example why your country needs a better basic education system.
What is the Trump Agenda?
Bringing industry and jobs back to America? Defeating ISIL? Lowering taxes? Restructuring Health Plans? Getting a handle on illegal immigration? Eradicating human trafficking /organ harvesting and other crimes against humanity? Dismantling the Shadow Government? Rebuilding US Military and Implementing a Space Force?

... FYI, if anything than Mr. T has transformed the swamp into a deep ocean with everyone filling their own pockets, he the most.

Can you please post your proof to the above fantasy statements.
- What industry has he brought back? - a few steel mills and a coal mine?
- What jobs? - On average he has not created more jobs than any other of the recent presidents
- Defeating ISIL? - who are you kidding? ISIL and the Taliban are still alive and kicking. FYI, ISIL was driven from the occupied territories according to an action plan the coalition forces agreed to in 2015, nothing from Mr. T that made an iota difference.
View attachment 93954
- What health plans?
- Has illegal immigration reduced significantly?
- Eradicating human trafficking...... ? - what kind of KoolAid made you say that?
- Shadow Government? - another conspiracy theory?... FYI, if anything than Mr. T has transformed the swamp into a deep ocean with everyone filling their own pockets, he the most.
- Rebuilding the military? - For the last 6 decades you had the most advanced and largest military. What Mr. T did is throw another $50Billion of borrowed money at it. Money that your kids and grandkids will have to pay back. At the same time he is cutting the education budget. What a genius idea!
- Space Force? - Do you think that is going to do any good when life on earth ceases to exist?
But yeah, keep having fun with your reality TV presidency where human respect and decency don't exist.
: Trump has signed the National Defence Authorisation Act into law for the mandatory screening of members of the military for gambling addiction. Should this be considered a bad omen for the future legalisation of online gambling (besides sportsbetting) in the US?
Let's stick to the main topic of this forum: Trump has signed the National Defence Authorisation Act into law for the mandatory screening of members of the military for gambling addiction. Should this be considered a bad omen for the future legalisation of online gambling (besides sportsbetting) in the US?
Meanwhile, the Department of Defence generates $100m each year from the 3,141 slot machines on overseas bases (slot machines have been banned on domestic military installations though)...![]()
56,000 of how many active duty members?
So, if this is so, why is the DoD still exploiting slot machines on overseas bases?
Trump has signed the National Defence Authorisation Act into law for the mandatory screening of members of the military for gambling addiction. Should this be considered a bad omen for the future legalisation of online gambling (besides sportsbetting) in the US?
And according to the UN North Korea has continued with its nuclear program.
And in other news, Manafort found guilty on 8 counts.
Michael Cohen pleads guilty and implicates president.
How are you all doing?
And the so called witch hunt is not over.
And according to the UN North Korea has continued with its nuclear program.
And in other news, Manafort found guilty on 8 counts.
Michael Cohen pleads guilty and implicates president.
How are you all doing?
And the so called witch hunt is not over.


And according to the UN North Korea has continued with its nuclear program.
And in other news, Manafort found guilty on 8 counts.
Michael Cohen pleads guilty and implicates president.
How are you all doing?
And the so called witch hunt is not over.
Don't you have a strange plea bargaining system in the US, where nearly everyone up on a charge pleads guilty to get a softer sentence rather than risk a trial and a harsher sentence?
Don't you have a strange plea bargaining system in the US, where nearly everyone up on a charge pleads guilty to get a softer sentence rather than risk a trial and a harsher sentence?
Beating a federal indictment in the United States is very rare and defendants are threatened in a multitude of unethical and unconstitutional ways. Remember what happened to Billy Dale (Travel office Director) when Bill & Hillary moved in to the White House? He almost pled guilty because his family was being threatened. Similar situation with Gen. Flynn. 95% of cases are settled via Plea Bargaining because the threats are real.
"Prosecutorial discretion also has resulted in harsher penalties for those defendants who opt for going to trial, rather than accepting a plea. Many researchers have found that those who go to trial are more likely to receive harsher sentences than those who accept a plea when comparable offenses are considered."
Outdated URL (Invalid)
