geordiecolin
Sporney eyed parrot faced wazzock
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2015
- Location
- Novacastrian
Are you serious?Cant say i read much american news, but im guessing most right-leaning papers/news-shows would be team-trump. Fox news comes to mind.
Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
All Games
Popular Bonus Filters
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Popular News Sections
About Us
Are you serious?Cant say i read much american news, but im guessing most right-leaning papers/news-shows would be team-trump. Fox news comes to mind.
What sounds not serious about it?Are you serious?
I will leave it to someone else to answerWhat sounds not serious about it?
I dont understand what you were after if that answer was so baffling.I will leave it to someone else to answer
I regestered your reply.I dont understand what you were after if that answer was so baffling.
Trump is right-leaning, so im assuming most right-leaning news would be supportive of him.
Dont see how that is weird in any way.
What American news supports Trump?
Are you serious?FoxNews does support Trump. It's RT of US...basically state run media or media run state.
Are you serious?
I will leave it for someone else to answer.I'm cereal...I'm super cereal!

It was a serious question. From what I understand the only American network that supports Trump is Fox News. Worldwide the only network that I know of that may be Trump leaning is RT. Yet unless there is some serious rigging Trump will still win in November.I dont understand what you were after if that answer was so baffling.
Trump is right-leaning, so im assuming most right-leaning news would be supportive of him.
Dont see how that is weird in any way.
It was a serious question. From what I understand the only American network that supports Trump is Fox News. Worldwide the only network that I know of that may be Trump leaning is RT. Yet unless there is some serious rigging Trump will still win in November.
My gripe is with the fact that news networks are so partisan in the first place. Being partisan invalidates a news organisation from being classed as a news organisation. It is not true journalism.

I can't see Biden running because the guy is losing his marbles.Otherwise I agree with you but this rigging part...only republicans are trying to rig the election. That's why Trump and Moscow Mitch don't want to invest in election security. And are trying all kinds of voter suppression efforts. I don't know if this happens in any european countries but US seems to be some kind of 2nd rate democracy.
Besides Biden has been leading Trump in about all swing states since forever. Trump is going down and you better get used to it![]()
I can't see Biden running because the guy is losing his marbles.
And I can see Trump seeking justice with Obama,the CIA and the rest for their illegal dealings re the Russia conspiracy. The shit could really hit the fan
So pleased that we have an accordYup sure. That's how it definitely will go.

Biden has the tara reade accusation hanging over him too, her mum phoned larry king's show in 93, which adds credence to the story, I think it could be the nail in his coffin:

COVID-19 is all over the White House??
Trump's Personal Valet
Pence's Press Secretary
Ivanka Trump's Personal Assistant
34 Secret Service Agents
Trump told other americans should be warriors and go back to work despite the virus. Maybe he should do the same.
That would mean putting his phone down and turning off Fox News.
Unless he starts liking OANN more.COVID-19 is all over the White House??
Trump's Personal Valet
Pence's Press Secretary
Ivanka Trump's Personal Assistant
34 Secret Service Agents


Who is this memo person anyway?
He/she says alot of things, but is seemingly never questioned.
Can we really trust memo?

Who is this Memo person anyway?
He/she says alot of things, but is seemingly never questioned.
Can we really trust Memo?
Mr T at what he does best: lying and sowing disinformation!
View attachment 130968
View attachment 130971
View attachment 130970

It does not matter if it was published by the Federalist of the Beano as long as it gives a timeline and names the main protagonists,which it does quite nicely.I won't even click on your link mate. Citing "The Federalist" is akin writing a fantasy story, the same relation to truth and reality.![]()
It was you who said "Being partisan invalidates a news organisation from being classed as a news organisation"It does not matter if it was published by the Federalist of the Beano as long as it gives a timeline and names the main protagonists,which it does quite nicely.
Do you believe in justice and the rule of law?
Because if you care to cross check the information provided you will find it to be accurate.It was you who said "Being partisan invalidates a news organisation from being classed as a news organisation"
So if you stand by that, it would invalidate The federalist as a news organisation, so why trust the timeline they have given you?
Of course i do.Because if you care to cross check the information provided you will find it to be accurate.
Do you believe in justice and the rule of law?
Of course i do.
Care to post these non-partisan sources used for the cross checking?
As i cant find any non-partisan sources confirming what is said in the heavily biased article, how can i decide if i think they deserve prosecution or not?Maybe you can take the time to do your own research?
As you believe in justice and the rule of law you will have no issue in seeing the prosecution of all of those who have broken the law in the persuit of having POTUS impeached on made up charges as well as those against Flynn?
All of those in the article I provided deserve prosecuting,don't you think?
Maybe you can take the time to do your own research?
As you believe in justice and the rule of law you will have no issue in seeing the prosecution of all of those who have broken the law in the persuit of having POTUS impeached on made up charges as well as those against Flynn?
All of those in the article I provided deserve prosecuting,don't you think?
I spend quite some time providing links which takes a lot of time watching and reading. It is so much more time consuming that posting memes.As i cant find any non-partisan sources confirming what is said in the heavily biased article, how can i decide if i think they deserve prosecution or not?
Only reason i asked you to post the sources was because i could not find non-partisan ones confirming what is said in the article, but since you trust what is in it, you must have found such sources.
I spend quite some time providing links which takes a lot of time watching and reading. It is so much more time consuming that posting memes.
I noticed that you must have taken a lot of time searching for such articles-either partisan or otherwise because you responded after searching and typing a reply in 5 minutes flat.
But you surely do not have to read that or any other article to except that Flynn and POTUS deserve retribution in law against those who very obviously attempted to unlawfull have them impeached and prosecuted?
Neat that you spend so much time providing links.I spend quite some time providing links which takes a lot of time watching and reading. It is so much more time consuming that posting memes.
I noticed that you must have taken a lot of time searching for such articles-either partisan or otherwise because you responded after searching and typing a reply in 5 minutes flat.
But you surely do not have to read that or any other article to except that Flynn and POTUS deserve retribution in law against those who very obviously attempted to unlawfull have them impeached and prosecuted?

I have better things to do than be camped in this site 24/7 because it has to be extremely unhealthy. Yes I could provide links to the timeline but as I have said I spend an inordinate amount of time providing them only to be met by a dismissive meme or the video not be watched. Do you not "get" that?Neat that you spend so much time providing links.
Then you surely wont mind posting the non-partisan sources you were talking about.
I dont believe for one second that you have done any cross checking involving non-partisan sources, but id be happy to be proven wrong about that.
Just because it takes more time rummaging around various youtubechannels and conspiracy-sites does not make it more worthwhile than posting memes.
Its pretty fun posting memes, you should try it sometime![]()
Its like poker.I can't even work out how to post a meme so I presume it's quite a task to master.
I have better things to do than be camped in this site 24/7 because it has to be extremely unhealthy. Yes I could provide links to the timeline but as I have said I spend an inordinate amount of time providing them only to be met by a dismissive meme or the video not be watched. Do you not "get" that?
I have other things to do so forgive me for not taking the time.
