external image

North Korea and US politics

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have better things to do than be camped in this site 24/7 because it has to be extremely unhealthy. Yes I could provide links to the timeline but as I have said I spend an inordinate amount of time providing them only to be met by a dismissive meme or the video not be watched. Do you not "get" that?
I have other things to do so forgive me for not taking the time.
Haha, yeah thats one way of saying "i have done zero cross checking" i guess.

And saying that spending time on this site is unhealthy is pretty rich coming from someone frequenting all those conspiracy ridden sites.
I wonder whats more detrimental for ones mental well-being.
:)
 
I'd like to request a facepalm emoji for this site please.
2212.gif
 
Neat that you spend so much time providing links.
Then you surely wont mind posting the non-partisan sources you were talking about.

I dont believe for one second that you have done any cross checking involving non-partisan sources, but id be happy to be proven wrong about that.

Just because it takes more time rummaging around various youtubechannels and conspiracy-sites does not make it more worthwhile than posting memes.
Its pretty fun posting memes, you should try it sometime ;)

If Col spent all week doing this would you then accept the sources, or then need to spend all week cross checking them yourself :p

The truth is there are no non-partisan sources these days, if somebody doesn't sue perhaps its true. If Flynn writes a book the editor will have to get a legal opinion on proofs/evidence before going to print.

I can't remember how long the mueller report was in pages but it shouldn't be expected that lay people read all these massive tomes just to express an opinion, like mueller couldn't even answer basic questions regarding his report and kept saying 'that is beyond my purview' :rolleyes: :laugh:

It's a bit lazy to say that article is rubbish and not provide any reasoning or evidence where it is wrong, if you post an article you shouldn't then have to write an essay alongside it proving all the points written by somebody else in an article :confused:

I happen to think the article could do with some numbered sources [but you often don't get that in online articles regarding politics] but also reads a bit like a draft chapter for a book, so I wonder if she is in the process of writing a book and this generates a little bit of interest.
 
If Col spent all week doing this would you then accept the sources, or then need to spend all week cross checking them yourself :p

The truth is there are no non-partisan sources these days, if somebody doesn't sue perhaps its true. If Flynn writes a book the editor will have to get a legal opinion on proofs/evidence before going to print.

I can't remember how long the mueller report was in pages but it shouldn't be expected that lay people read all these massive tomes just to express an opinion, like mueller couldn't even answer basic questions regarding his report and kept saying 'that is beyond my purview' :rolleyes: :laugh:

It's a bit lazy to say that article is rubbish and not provide any reasoning or evidence where it is wrong, if you post an article you shouldn't then have to write an essay alongside it proving all the points written by somebody else in an article :confused:

I happen to think the article could do with some numbered sources [but you often don't get that in online articles regarding politics] but also reads a bit like a draft chapter for a book, so I wonder if she is in the process of writing a book and this generates a little bit of interest.
Only reason i asked was because he himself said that partisan news were not considered news.
But since the article says something he agrees with, he takes it hook line and sinker even tho the source is clearly biased.
Like you say, there is hardly any non-biased information available these days, but since he claims to have found such soruces i was interested in seeing what they were.

Or more like i was calling him out since i dont believe he has done any cross checking at all, atleast none involving non-biased sources. And i got the answer i expected "i cant be bothered".
Wich seems to be the go-to answer when not able to prove something.
 
If Col spent all week doing this would you then accept the sources, or then need to spend all week cross checking them yourself :p

The truth is there are no non-partisan sources these days, if somebody doesn't sue perhaps its true. If Flynn writes a book the editor will have to get a legal opinion on proofs/evidence before going to print.

I can't remember how long the mueller report was in pages but it shouldn't be expected that lay people read all these massive tomes just to express an opinion, like mueller couldn't even answer basic questions regarding his report and kept saying 'that is beyond my purview' :rolleyes: :laugh:

It's a bit lazy to say that article is rubbish and not provide any reasoning or evidence where it is wrong, if you post an article you shouldn't then have to write an essay alongside it proving all the points written by somebody else in an article :confused:

I happen to think the article could do with some numbered sources [but you often don't get that in online articles regarding politics] but also reads a bit like a draft chapter for a book, so I wonder if she is in the process of writing a book and this generates a little bit of interest.

1589122879226.webp


You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Oh, and burden of proof is not on the one not believing in a statement, but rather on the one making the statement.

If i say "santa is real" do you think you should have to prove why he does not exist, or should i prove that he does?

He's real dam you... I have no proof but I just know ... in my heart bless me.
 
Only reason i asked was because he himself said that partisan news were not considered news.
But since the article says something he agrees with, he takes it hook line and sinker even tho the source is clearly biased.
Like you say, there is hardly any non-biased information available these days, but since he claims to have found such soruces i was interested in seeing what they were.

Or more like i was calling him out since i dont believe he has done any cross checking at all, atleast none involving non-biased sources. And i got the answer i expected "i cant be bothered".
Wich seems to be the go-to answer when not able to prove something.

To be honest if I'd posted that article, and I was thinking of writing something about Flynn's case, I would have to turn down the cross checking request too :oops:...its an impossible mission.

Then again with a deepstate operation they are not going to leave any trails if possible, so there may never be any factual info that reveals much, I think hillary deleted 33,000 odd emails or something and I'm sure the FBI /CIA can cover their steps more professionally than she could.
 
A timeline.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

OK, I made the effort to read the piece and if you would make the effort to read just a few pages of Mueller's report, you will find out that the Federalist left a ton of stuff out of their storyline so they can paint Mr T as the victim. No wonder the cult thinks like that if they never go past their usual channels and thus never read any factual information. :rolleyes:

And no, I won't tell you which pages and appendixes of the report have the details (I indeed read the entire report, both parts), it is all publicly available. You know, you can find yourself. :D
 
Last edited:
To be honest if I'd posted that article, and I was thinking of writing something about Flynn's case, I would have to turn down the cross checking request too :oops:...its an impossible mission.

Then again with a deepstate operation they are not going to leave any trails if possible, so there may never be any factual info that reveals much, I think hillary deleted 33,000 odd emails or something and I'm sure the FBI /CIA can cover their steps more professionally than she could.
How can it be an impossible mission if he already has done it?
It could of course be that he has not done it and was simply lying.
Guess we will never find out now since he cant be bothered. :)

Blaming lack of sources on conspiracy-theories seems like a get out of jail free card thats being used quite frequently.
"Oh i cant prove that because "they" have removed all the info"
And you said me saying an article was rubbish was lazy :P
 
Oh, and burden of proof is not on the one not believing in a statement, but rather on the one making the statement.

If i say "santa is real" do you think you should have to prove why he does not exist, or should i prove that he does?

what if you quote a journalist or author, say 'Harry kroffe' who says Trump is a russian agent :p the article is there to be discussed, for and against, but if folk just say 'I'm not reading it, it's rubbish unless you've personally cross checked it' that's the end of the discussion surely?
 
what if you quote a journalist or author, say 'Harry kroffe' who say's Trump is a russian agent :p the article is there to be discussed, for and against, but if folk just say 'I'm not reading it, it's rubbish unless you've personally cross checked it' that's the end of the discussion surely?
So you are saying you cant deny santas existence without making your own research regarding it?
Even if the article claiming santa exists comes from extremely Pro-north pole circles?

Thats why i was interested in seeing the so called non-partisan sources, so i wouldnt have to read the info from a far-right newspaper wich have every reason to alter the facts.
 
Or maybe the deepstate is controlled by the Reptillians...... or perhaps they Aliens that landed in Roswell in 1947 are the real architects of the deepstate?
Dude, atleast have the decency to use one of these before saying something like that.

gfgfg.gif


Now i wont even bother researching the deepstate since you spoiled the ending.
Thanks alot. :mad:
 
Oh, and burden of proof is not on the one not believing in a statement, but rather on the one making the statement.

If i say "santa is real" do you think you should have to prove why he does not exist, or should i prove that he does?

You need to prove that he does exist. Now hurry up and back up your statement.

To help you i found a video online showing santa and his reindeer. As it is online it must be true.

 
You need to prove that he does exist. Now hurry up and back up your statement.

To help you i found a video online showing santa and his reindeer. As it is online it must be true.



Alt Right Publications don't count - that middle one looks too shifty for my liking.
 
So you are saying you cant deny santas existence without making your own research regarding it?
Even if the article claiming santa exists comes from extremely Pro-north pole circles?

Thats why i was interested in seeing the so called non-partisan sources, so i wouldnt have to read the info from a far-right newspaper wich have every reason to alter the facts.

But you can't slander and defame people willy-nilly if you are a high profile writer on a well known website therefore you could read the article and then wonder how likely or believable/credible it sounds. Writers have to check their sources, could be Mollie is getting info from someone in the administration...

I think the existence of santa claus is in a different category to the existence of dirty tricks in power politics.
 
You need to prove that he does exist. Now hurry up and back up your statement.

To help you i found a video online showing santa and his reindeer. As it is online it must be true.



Already sent proof of santas existence to Borgie.
Also i have personal reasons to believe he exists.
How else would you explain the presents that somehow appeared under the christmas tree?
 
But you can't slander and defame people willy-nilly if you are a high profile writer on a well known website therefore you could read the article and then wonder how likely or believable/credible it sounds. Writers have to check their sources, could be Mollie is getting info from someone in the administration...

I think the existence of santa claus is in a different category to the existence of dirty tricks in power politics.
You definitely can slander and defame people even if you are a somewhat well known journalist.
Or are you saying no big journalists slander & defame Trump?
Slandering and defaming is like the bread and butter of modern journalism.
 
You are actually on the right track..
Crazy thing about Santa is th....

View attachment 131005

The truth is out there .

You just need to find it.

But think of it this way. Humans can't live as long as Santa has. I believe he is from ************.

Anyway is it just me or is this former even weirder than usual this weekend.
 
I'll come back to this later on, john durham hasn't made his findings public yet.

I do get the feeling it is so complex and convoluted the truth will never be fully known.
By then it will be too late.
All information about this conversation will have been replaced by memes and gifs.
Moahahaha

Edit: In my head that is. I cant control what other people remember...yet.
 
You definitely can slander and defame people even if you are a somewhat well known journalist.
Or are you saying no big journalists slander & defame Trump?
Slandering and defaming is like the bread and butter of modern journalism.

I think there are rules about libel and slander, it has to be significant. I believe Trump was suing somebody, maybe CNN :confused:

I just don't think a writer like mollie hemingway would make something up totally without some background source material, what credibility and career would she have left?
 
It's getting a bit feral, for sure. What next, folk on going slots are rigged? Nuts.

Well now that you mention it. I read somewhere recently that roulette was rigged. :eek:

I know who would have believed it.

But from a neutral point of view.

This forum has taught me that roulette and slots are all rigged.

God ,Santa , Aliens all exist.

Vaccines are harmful. 5G is the end of the world. Heavy Satanic Metal by japanese girls is the in thing.

This Coranavirus or mild flu depending on the reporter did not come from bats but was released on purpose to wipe out all old gits.

Who would have thought a gambling forum could offer so much.
 
I think there are rules about libel and slander, it has to be significant. I believe Trump was suing somebody, maybe CNN :confused:

I just don't think a writer like mollie hemingway would make something up totally without some background source material, what credibility and career would she have left?
Well i cant claim to have read up about it, but Harry said they had left out a bunch of stuff, twisting the story to make Trump out to be the victim.
I dont know how factual the article is, but i know the paper is biased, so i dont think its wrong to assume the article is aswell.
I really dont care about it enough to read the whole mueller report, thats what i have Harry for. ;)
 
Well now that you mention it. I read somewhere recently that roulette was rigged. :eek:

I know who would have believed it.

But from a neutral point of view.

This forum has taught me that roulette and slots are all rigged.

God ,Santa , Aliens all exist.

Vaccines are harmful. 5G is the end of the world. Heavy Satanic Metal by japanese girls is the in thing.

This Coranavirus or mild flu depending on the reporter did not come from bats but was released on purpose to wipe out all old gits.

Who would have thought a gambling forum could offer so much.
You forgot the deepstate and the Reptillians, or are they just stretching your belief a wee bit too far...
 
You forgot the deepstate and the Reptillians, or are they just stretching your belief a wee bit too far...

There was just too much too mention.

Life has got to the stage where i am learning from a bear who cannot even get his head out of the bucket it is stuck in.
 
Well i cant claim to have read up about it, but Harry said they had left out a bunch of stuff, twisting the story to make Trump out to be the victim.
I dont know how factual the article is, but i know the paper is biased, so i dont think its wrong to assume the article is aswell.
I really dont care about it enough to read the whole mueller report, thats what i have Harry for. ;)

Lies

It's for the slot game sheets
 
Neat that you spend so much time providing links.
Then you surely wont mind posting the non-partisan sources you were talking about.

I dont believe for one second that you have done any cross checking involving non-partisan sources, but id be happy to be proven wrong about that.

Just because it takes more time rummaging around various youtubechannels and conspiracy-sites does not make it more worthwhile than posting memes.
Its pretty fun posting memes, you should try it sometime ;)
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


Link Removed

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


Any other information can be read by brousing the 450 page Mueller report

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


Link Removed

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


Any other information can be read by brousing the 450 page Mueller report

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Neat!
Will listen to it when i go for my nightly walk!
 
You have really enhanced your credability lately
I have never claimed to have any sort of credibility regarding this.
Nor do i care much about what happens in the upper echelons of US politics.
Seems to always have been mud-slinging from both sides there.

Its of course the same here in Sweden, but much less extreme than in the US.
 
I have never claimed to have any sort of credibility regarding this.
Nor do i care much about what happens in the upper echelons of US politics.
Seems to always have been mud-slinging from both sides there.

Its of course the same here in Sweden, but much less extreme than in the US.
Good night and sleep well you cuddly bear :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top