Expired Promo Nolimit City + L&L Europe Ltd + CasinoMeister's Book of Shadows

There are promos that are no more.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Guys,

What about we deal this comp per account at L&L instead of per member? Gives you more changes to win and you can apply a different game plan per casino?

I'm fine with it, if no objections, lets do it!

Kr. Jan
 
Guys,

What about we deal this comp per account at L&L instead of per member? Gives you more changes to win and you can apply a different game plan per casino?

I'm fine with it, if no objections, lets do it!

Kr. Jan


So Theoretically, one player could win 1st at fun, 2nd at CasinoCasino and 3rd at Yako, 4th at nobonus, 5th at ABC

Etc, etc....

And it would need to be minimum 500 spins at each casino?
 
So Theoretically, one player could win 1st at fun, 2nd at CasinoCasino and 3rd at Yako, 4th at nobonus, 5th at ABC

Etc, etc....

And it would need to be minimum 500 spins at each casino?

Yes thats correct, and each account need to meet the criteria to qualify.
 
haha, no mate, as a CM member with 4 accounts you can simply enter with 4 accounts (and win more as once). Prizepool and distribution remains the same.
 
Guys,

What about we deal this comp per account at L&L instead of per member? Gives you more changes to win and you can apply a different game plan per casino?

I'm fine with it, if no objections, lets do it!

Kr. Jan

I was thinking about joining this, but I probably won't regardless, due to financial stuff. But if I had participated, it would've been only on one casino. Therefore I cannot see how a rule change like this is beneficial to the player. "Gives more chances to win" .. ok sure .. if you're Mr. Moneybags that can afford to play a "25% RTP" game on five different casinos with 500 spins on each. Basically all I see is this proposed change doing is it would give an advantage to those who can afford to try multiple times.

Since I probably won't be participating, you could say I shouldn't really care what you end up doing, but I felt like expressing my opinion nonetheless.
 
I was thinking about joining this, but I probably won't regardless, due to financial stuff. But if I had participated, it would've been only on one casino. Therefore I cannot see how a rule change like this is beneficial to the player. "Gives more chances to win" .. ok sure .. if you're Mr. Moneybags that can afford to play a "25% RTP" game on five different casinos with 500 spins on each. Basically all I see is this proposed change doing is it would give an advantage to those who can afford to try multiple times.

Since I probably won't be participating, you could say I shouldn't really care what you end up doing, but I felt like expressing my opinion nonetheless.
Yes those thoughts crossed my mind too. Or it will benefit someone who happened to get very lucky at their first attempt allowing them to take more spins at other casinos. It would mean buying your way to success which is not really a level playing field
 
Objections, so we run it as normal.

@pinnit2014 i Will check that out!
 
Hi all, not trying to lure you in or anything like that, but this is worth a share... we have received our biggest win ever on a game last night on Book of Shadows...


I don’t understand the game fully. Why did the base game have a 3 rows but the bonus game had 4 rows? Does the bonus round award a random number of rows?
 
Last edited:
When does it expand to 5 columns of 6? Ive had 2 bonuses on 40p and it never had more than 4 in a column.
Apparently you can select number of spins/lines. Fewer spins and more rows etc.
It was also mentioned that you can switch the expanding symbol once... but o wouldn’t know this personally as I have still to hit a bonus round lol
 
Gotta say this is one very very clever game, it's amazing how many times you get 3 scatters when your playing 3 x 5 mode and the 3rd scatter is on blacked out lines. Go to 4 x 5 mode and it's almost the same, now goto the full 5 x 5 setup and whadda yah know. It really is the best way I have seen of getting you to double your stake with half the reward. Well done. (I have had a few bonuses on this yes and most were very good but they all dropped on the 3 x 5 setup and I chose the 5 x 5 setup to play the feature)
 
I don’t understand the game fully. Why did the base game have a 3 rows but the bonus game had 4 rows? Does the bonus round award a random number of rows?
Dont know if it been answered when you get the feature you can choose the amount of lines to play the more lines the less spins. Also if you hit the feature on 5 open lines you also get more spins.
 
I thought Book of Ming could tear through a balance, even for your typical volatile book games, but this seems to have cranked it up - the amount of times you don't get 3 of even 10's, is quite the thing ;-)

Had a 4 book re-trigger...but it seems to only give you ten extra? - is that not the same as 3?:confused: (i thought it would have been 20 and another symbol such is my laziness for checking pay tables :p
 
I thought Book of Ming could tear through a balance, even for your typical volatile book games, but this seems to have cranked it up - the amount of times you don't get 3 of even 10's, is quite the thing ;-)

Had a 4 book re-trigger...but it seems to only give you ten extra? - is that not the same as 3?:confused: (i thought it would have been 20 and another symbol such is my laziness for checking pay tables :p
As far as i know theres no extra spins for extra scatters.

Had 3 bonuses, one 3oak Queens to show for it.
Game is pretty harsh.
I have been playing it 3 rows on 10p and increasing to 5 for the bonus.
Bonus seems about as easy to trigger with 3 rows as 5.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top