NetEnt Open Questions

[Harry_BKK]

I don't know how much everyone here is venturing out to try all new games. I can assure you that overall Netent is doing a rather good job when compared to others. The garbage I get to see on a daily basis is mindblowing.

Who speaks about or plays a lot the gazillion releases from Red Tiger (except maybe Laser Fruit), Elk Studios, Yggdrasil, Lightning Box, JustForTheWin, Betsoft, iSoftbet, Ainsworth, 1x2 Gaming, 2BY2 Gaming to name just a few? And I mean to the same extent that we grant DOA or Bonanza? I would guess, nobody.

We only had a few memorable games in the last years, no matter the amount of providers. Fact is that online gaming transitioned from catering to a hardcore gambling community to entertaining an entire "family" from late-teens to grandparents. Both ends of the "family" spectrum have rather low gaming budgets. The hardcore people were mostly HV fans to get a good adrenaline kick, the "family" is looking for entertainment. This is clearly reflected in the "low-risk" games that have been coming to the market lately, where the win potential is low - medium but the variance gives usually plenty of playtime.

The aim is though the same. A provider has to give a new game an aura that it can pay big but you will have fun while losing your money. Big Time Gaming is the best example. When was the last time we saw a 2,000+ x bet win from BTG games, let alone the 10K+ that they should be capable of producing, yet we all keep slogging on them ad nauseam. Just think back 2 years ago when we were all hammering DOA like mad, there were daily screens of 2,000+ in the respective threads.

We can moan about games like Jungle Spirit or Warlords (win potential similar to DOA), but who among us has given those games the same playtime as DOA? I could go even further and ask who chooses regularly the Tiger option with just 4 spins or the Elephant option with 8 spins for their bonus rounds on Jungle Spirit? Because there is were the 2K+ wins are, although the rounds have the highest volatility but then DOA is no different. Are we not taking the countless 4-10x bet wins in DOA bonus rounds on the chin and keep slogging on hoping the next one will give us the monster?

Just my two cents!

 

[Supababe]

Welcome back @burgstrom and may I apologise for the rude welcome back in May, but I guess we have had many many people visiting previously who suffered from heightened grandeur and tried to BS members. Please forgive us x

Personally I think Netent produce the greatest variety of play from straight 5 reel no bonus etc to Jumanji style or Planet of the apes... which should appeal to all (but somehow doesn’t).

Graphics I don’t give a flying monkeys about. Better graphics just means more chance of slow play to me.
Also the obsession with using current movies/pop groups etc is totally unnecessary in my humble opinion especially if it costs in license fees (I would rather it be used to increase rtp somehow).

Based on my game play (totally unbiased in fact), my biggest problem is the hot/cold nature of netent games.
Themepark in particular springs to mind where features and free spins where extremely frequent for a few months following release but gold tickets are as rare as rocking horse poop now.
I know that hot/cold is not a controllable feature (or so wee are told lol).

Are you aware of VIdeoslots sit and go battles? When these were tried with Netent games it failed due to server issues. This went nowhere to improving your reputation.

These are just my initial ramblings sorry.

Wishing you every success in the future and hope that we at CM can help to move forward with positive contributions x


And I forgot to say... where’s dunover? Wink x

 

[SpinUk]

I don't know how much everyone here is venturing out to try all new games. I can assure you that overall Netent is doing a rather good job when compared to others. The garbage I get to see on a daily basis is mindblowing.

Who speaks about or plays a lot the gazillion releases from Red Tiger (except maybe Laser Fruit), Elk Studios, Yggdrasil, Lightning Box, JustForTheWin, Betsoft, iSoftbet, Ainsworth, 1x2 Gaming, 2BY2 Gaming to name just a few? And I mean to the same extent that we grant DOA or Bonanza? I would guess, nobody.

We only had a few memorable games in the last years, no matter the amount of providers. Fact is that online gaming transitioned from catering to a hardcore gambling community to entertaining an entire "family" from late-teens to grandparents. Both ends of the spectrum have rather low gaming budgets. The hardcore people were mostly HV fans to get a good adrenaline kick, the "family" is looking for entertainment. This is clearly reflected in the "low-risk" games that have been coming to the market lately, where the win potential is low - medium but the variance gives usually plenty of playtime.

The aim is though the same. A provider has to give a new game an aura that it can pay big but you will have fun while losing your money. Big Time Gaming is the best example. When was the last time we saw a 2,000+ x bet win from BTG games, let alone the 10K+ that they should be capable of producing. Just think back 2 years ago when we were all hammering DOA like mad, there were daily screens of 2,000+ in the respective threads.

We can moan about cames like Jungle Spirit or Warlords (win potential similar to DOA), but who among us has given those games the same playtime as DOA. I could go even further and ask who chooses regularly the Tiger option with just 4 spins or the Elephant option with 8 spins for their bonus rounds? Because there is were the 2K+ wins are, although the rounds have the highest volatility but then DOA is no different. Are we not taking the countless 4-10x bet wins in DOA bonus rounds on the chin and keep slogging on hoping the next one will give us the monster?

Just my two cents!

Last time I looked Netent was losing money and had lost 50% of its share price in the last 12 months, in a rapidly expanding market too.

So I don’t this this is a collective lack of perspective from us here. If anything Netent had almost complete dominance of the market - baring MG - a very short while ago, but this is where they have now arrived.

So I think this a good move of the company to reach out for guidance to the Casinomeister community.

 

[Harry_BKK]

Last time I looked Netent was losing money and had lost 50% of its share price in the last 12 months, in a rapidly expanding market too.

So I don’t this this is a collective lack of perspective from us here. If anything Netent had almost complete dominance of the market - baring MG - a very short while ago, but this is where they have now arrived.

So I think this a good move of the company to reach out for guidance to the Casinomeister community.

The share price went down 50% in the last year but is still double than 5 years ago. As for losing money, interim report Q1-Q2/2018 - operating profit SEK283 Million (margin 32.5%)

I think too, that it is a good idea to listen to player communities like CM since we are the players who spent most on the games. The loss in dominance is to a large part due to new competitors coming to the market. Where you had maybe a dozen 5 years ago, you have now well over 50 vying for a share of the market. However, Netent surely is not totally innocent for its fall from the top.

Today, new games, not just from Netent, are tossed aside after a few poor sessions. How many of those do we have on popular games yet still go back time and again?

 

[asidea]

Hiya @burgstrom, Welcome back!.

I like Starburst..that is the old starburst version whereby ure not limited to 10 line minimum bet..u could play 1 line if one chooses.
I also love slots that is packed full of features, like wild reels, stack wilds, multiplier, freespins(not limited to 5 fs but able to re-trigger), and bonuses.
Can you make a newer version of starburst and pack all this features in it?. This i would like to see..hopefully!.

Furthemore, i think its better to produce one spectacular slot(that ppl actually can get immersed in), then producing many under-rated games.

 

[mack341]

When was the last time we saw a 2,000+ x bet win from BTG games,

This was the last time I personally saw one:

If netent could get some of this potential into their new releases they will do well, £240 at 20p would be great, and let it happen 3 times as often.

 

[pinnit2014]

Probably made, in my mind, the best game in DOA. I do think it plays differently to the old but as iv had more luck on it I don’t care Not many games will see me sit through poor bonus after poor bonus but DoA it doesn’t matter

The new games are just not up to it for me - more recently you made Jungle Spirit - probably the closest to the old games in terms of what players like. But then... it’s back to rubbish like Jumanji: do you change game developers often

Sometimes you need to look back to go forward and DOA, JS,JATB, Wild Rockets, Secret of the Stones all have seen big wins for me and whatever games been developed if it were along those lines I’d play more with Netent.

I just don’t have any confidence of, once I’m down a certain amount, of even getting back to my deposit never mind withdrawing with most of the new releases. That’s not right....

 

[Jono777]

This was the last time I personally saw one:View attachment 93571

If netent could get some of this potential into their new releases they will do well, £240 at 20p would be great, and let it happen 3 times as often.

Geez, that hit, at that stake when nearly a bust too, I'd still be buzzing now

Nice, very nice and yes indeed something we need to be able to hit from time to time on Netent slots

 

[mack341]

Geez, that hit, at that stake when nearly a bust too, I'd still be buzzing now

Nice, very nice and yes indeed something we need to be able to hit from time to time on Netent slots

Jono I think I started with a £10 deposit , sad to say all that money was donated back to the casinos within about 2 weeks of bonanza/rhino low rolling, unbelievable!!

 

[Glassheart]

Can you make a game just called D?

So when we can't find it on Bonanza we know where to go to?

 

[incrediblestuff]

First off, an 'official' welcome to the forum Burgstrom Really cool to get more providers on board, especially one that opens up a thread for player-feedback! As there are a few browsing the forums already, but so far - as far as i can tell - there are only 3 (yourself included) that actually posted some info, or were open to input or criticism. Without further ado, i'll just start by answering the following questions:

What are we doing that we should stop?
I think dishing out too many Games that feel like skins/clones, is one thing that we can all miss, even if the original was a smashing hit. Sequels, or deluxe versions can of course be awesome, but just refurbishing a Game with a new set of symbols and/or theme/music, isn't really what players want or need. That said, i know there are also a lot of players, specifically here on the forums, that would love to see some of their favorite math models, implemented in a more flashy theme (or w/e it is that floats their boat). as proven by the above poster asking for a freshly themed version of DOA

And as zap already pointed out first, it would be cool to be able to skip 'useless animations' too...most experienced gamblers can already surmise when a 'special feature' such as added wilds or whatever, won't be able to form a winning line, and at that point would rather skip whatever sequence is coming, and spin on. I know a lot of punters here feel exactly the same way, as we have been discussing about this a lot in the past years.

What are we doing that we should keep doing?
Making Games such as DOA, Jack & The Beanstalk, Starburst, Twin Spin, The Wishmaster, The invisible Man, Steamtower, Drive and more recently Planet of The Apes, Hotline, Lost Relics, Jumanji and Mirror Mirror. These surely don't appeal to all, but - even if i don't play them all a lot , after i tested them properly - i do keep coming back to them, as i recognize them as great Games. The list goes on of course, but i think those Games stand out.

Surely, a critic can find things to improve in pretty much any Slot, but let's face it, as Harry also stated - how many of us have really compared them to the rest of the providers out there? And without tossing a Game to the side after a bad run. It's mostly only after someone posted a huge win on video or per screenshot, that players see the potential, and revisit such games again.
People nowadays are spoiled, and way too critical i.m.o. not only concerning Slots, but that's for another thread

I can promise that i'm one of the few that tries all new Games, from the moment they are released, and give them a proper bashing, even if that means my (pathetic) bankroll is obliterated...
So, as one of the few who really churned through millions of spins on pretty much all of your Slots, i can say that i really enjoy them, and still consider Netent as one of the main providers out there. Keep that up!

What aren't we doing that we should be?
You just started this thread, so moot point
I mean this is probably the only thing i could think of that Netent (or any other provider for that matter) should do...
Perhaps make a beta testing team again, comprised of veteran players, such as Leander recently did here on the forums, prior to the release of their 'Inferno' Slot...

I say again, because at one point i am pretty sure i was involved in something like that from Netent, through Mr. Green, which involved getting to play the new releases before they were released to the main public: and that was not on Netent's site, but they just appeared to players in that group, in the Casino lobby. Iirc, that was halted for unspecified reasons with intent to revisit later, but i never heard anything about it afterwards, and that was years ago....

Lastly: you aren't hiring me as in-house 24/7 Game tester, but you definitely should

Game Features you like, dislike.
I love Sticky Wilds, Expanding Wilds, Multiplying Wilds, perhaps one could say i'm just a sucker for Wilds in general. I really like the Overlay wild and added Multiplier Wilds in Drive Multiplier Mayhem, and i also love the Chests with Wilds, Coins and Extra Spins in Lost Relics - one of your best releases of late i.m.o.. But there's so much more i like, it's too much too mention. I don't like extreme teases, such as the one's you generally find in Blueprint and Red Tiger Games....terrible - so please don't start with that! The third Scatter not dropping in after the cliffhanger is more than enough tease for me

User Interface and User Experience stuff that is driving you crazy good or crazy bad about our games
I personally would like to see the Software remember ALL my preferred settings, and would go as far as to say: please prevent all your clients from making that optional. Just remember the last player settings per player, per Casino - forever, until they change it themselves. And i also would like to see a Slot opening on minimum bet -always, unless the player sets it to another preferred bet-size. This will not only prevent a lot of issues with accidental max bets etc. but also lead to general appreciation from both players and responsible gaming organisations. I'm not saying your Software is bad in that regard, it's actually one of the better ones, but when you give Operators the choice to set their own minimum, or defaults - it's not perfect.

Nothing to say about the advanced auto-player, as that is one of the best out there, although some newer releases lack a few of the most common options (no bonus round stop in Jumanji - and even if you want it to automatically play, it then appears you can not, as you need to pick a piece, then roll manually)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There's much more to be said, but i don't want to write a book here, i am very excited about you joining the forum, and hope it sets an example for other providers, so i'll just throw in a few ideas and questions:

1: Perhaps you could revisit Microgaming's old project 'My Slot' whereby you could more or less make your own 'perfect' nine liner, using various symbols (or your own uploaded pic's), and musical themes - which of course was a great idea, but quite poorly executed

I see a lot of potential there though...imagine a player being able to pick a math model, theme and music/sound package...that would silence a lot of moaning players, and make a lot of us quite happy...

2: I have been extending my playtime a lot, by low-rolling the tournaments in the Reel Thrills, over at Mr. Green, which are awesome, and more importantly, fair for all. I would love to see this in more Casino's: is there anything you can do there, or is that something exclusive for Mr. Green for now?

3: Can you divulge anything about the release of the immersive Virtual Games we could see in London last February?

I'll think of more, but that should do for now

 

[zap987]

Noted thank you. What is the ideal size win that you would want from a game on a regular basis? I'm curious. The well known issue is a game cannot deliver massive wins all the time, unless the game's server is plugged directly in Elon Musk's private bank account (I'm working on Musk's Moolah right now j/k). The quandry is then how do we communicate that it can indeed pay but that it's a patience thing? Smaller more frequent versions of the big feature to let you know something could happen? You say above that sucks. Whats a good way of doing this do you think?

I think the 300-500x range is the important one, it's where you win enough that if you have a bonus with wagering you feel you have a realistic chance to make it to the end. Obviously the frequency will be impacted by the size of the wins, it's just a matter of allocating enough of the RTP that they actually happen now and then. I can't remember the last time I hit even 300x on a Netent game that wasn't DoA, and I had it twice today on Dragon's Treasure and Knight's Life.

I'm not sure you need to focus that much on communicating the potential, if the game pays the win, the players will make sure they get seen, there are so many ways now in streams, social media and forums like this. Maybe I'm wrong though and only a small fraction of players actually see those things, you can still show players the true potential, the best way will depend on the exact mechanics of the game. For example a game like Danger High Voltage does it perfectly fine in both versions of the freespins. You see the wilds lock in place and it's not very hard for a player to imagine how much they'd win if they just hit a few more wilds, maybe even a retrigger. I could be completely wrong, but the game 'feels' fair when playing it too, if you have 3 wilds on a reel and need one more to retrigger you have a reasonable chance to hit, all the math is already done in the base chance of hitting the wilds. This is unlike for example Mirror Mirror where it feels like the win of the mirror feature is predetermined and the reels are just spinning for show and stop adding winning symbols. Maybe I just got unlucky in my testing, but the lack of screenshots posted doesn't help.

High variance on the bonus rounds and lower variance on the base game is now a proven route to success for games. Hence why developers that are going places are now almost exclusively producing games like this.

Funny part is this is a perfect description of Dead or Alive, they had the recipe way back and just threw it away. They could just release DoA2 with updated graphics and maybe 243 ways or more paylines to reduce the variance a little and it would be a success almost guaranteed.

the Max Theoretical win on BerryBurst is x3000 bet or x6000 for BerryBurst MAX....

But what % of the RTP is made up by wins of 1000x or greater? That's what matters to players. And that is the theoretical amount of spins needed to hit those 6000x?

 

[incrediblestuff]

I think the 300-500x range is the important one, it's where you win enough that if you have a bonus with wagering you feel you have a realistic chance to make it to the end. Obviously the frequency will be impacted by the size of the wins, it's just a matter of allocating enough of the RTP that they actually happen now and then. I can't remember the last time I hit even 300x on a Netent game that wasn't DoA, and I had it twice today on Dragon's Treasure and Knight's Life.

There are plenty of Netent Games that can pay well over 300x, and the same goes for other providers, but that is not something you will see every session: i know you're a long time player, and you must realize you were quite lucky to hit both those winsd on Dragon's Treasure and Knight's life in one session: those are absolutely high variance games, so in the same category as DOA. If you were looking at a lot of the other Netent Slots, you'd have to compare them to similar Slots from other providers..which is not really possible with Merkur.

It maybe down to samplesize, as i have been steadily playing Netent over the years, and i have had my fair share of 300x wins and higher, from Games such as Drive, Stickers, NRVNA, J&TB, Planet of the Apes, Jumanji, Mirror Mirror, and even Hansel and Gretel, and i could list about 40 more, no kidding.

I'm not sure you need to focus that much on communicating the potential, if the game pays the win, the players will make sure they get seen, there are so many ways now in streams, social media and forums like this. Maybe I'm wrong though and only a small fraction of players actually see those things, you can still show players the true potential, the best way will depend on the exact mechanics of the game. For example a game like Danger High Voltage does it perfectly fine in both versions of the freespins. You see the wilds lock in place and it's not very hard for a player to imagine how much they'd win if they just hit a few more wilds, maybe even a retrigger. I could be completely wrong, but the game 'feels' fair when playing it too, if you have 3 wilds on a reel and need one more to retrigger you have a reasonable chance to hit, all the math is already done in the base chance of hitting the wilds. This is unlike for example Mirror Mirror where it feels like the win of the mirror feature is predetermined and the reels are just spinning for show and stop adding winning symbols. Maybe I just got unlucky in my testing, but the lack of screenshots posted doesn't help.

As stated above, i played about 500K spins since release, for sure, possibly double that, and i've seen many wins over 100x from that feature...but seeing how frequently this feature lands, i was not surprised at all the non winning ones either: that said - it's not the same as the FS features in DHV: in fact it's a 'random' feature, which can be triggered in 2 ways. So, logically, there isn't as much of the RTP allocated to those features, and they will most likely indeed often be good for a win of around 30x..and having played DHV as much as the next guy, i can safely say that DHV also feels just as rigged as any other slot does, when it's screwing you I have had so many chances for retiggers, and so many low paying bonuses on their Slots....it's the same everywhere -huge potential or not, if a Slot wants to pay, it will, and if it doesn't - it won't.

Lack of screenshots is a good point: there have only been a handful of posters that have consistently posted those over the years, i used to be one of them, but nowadays i can't be arsed, unless it's something truly exceptional.. I think therefore, a lot of what we see depends on what that handful of posters really plays...

But, i do like to see the potential displayed: i want to know what i can expect, when the stars align...

 

[lotusch]

WoW great to see a Netent Rep popping up.. Welcome!!
I might have a few questions in the coming days..
Will most certainly post them here..

I know Starburst is one of the most popular Netent games but most seasoned players on this forum curse the game.
So I wonder where this popularity comes from as personally I hate the game, it is such a boring annoying egg timer game with nothing going for.
How often does it actually give the 3 stars on reels 2,3,4 for example.
Never ever seen it.

I have played Power Stars (Novomatic) a lot and this slot actually does pay the 3 wild lines quite often on reels 2,3,4 and this is quite a volatile slot.

That said I used to hate Netent in my early online gambling career,some members can confirm this as I was always giving out about the slots.

Over the years when I got more experienced I really started to like and appreciate Netent much better.

I play them now on every session and my faveNetent slots for now would be:

Steamtower
Wolfcub
Secret of the Stones
Wild Wild West
Fairytale Legends (All 3 of them) Had already some sweet hits on Mirror Mirror.
Nrvana (love the mellow music in it)
Jackpot 6000 because it has a very decent chance of hitting that 600x stake.
Drive Multiplier Mayhem


Netent slots I really dislike, but still play them sometimes:

Dead or Alive (In tens of thousands of spins over several casinos I managed to only hit 2x a wild line and never a 5 scatter) insane!! And the slots hates me too.
Lost Island (Down at least 4k over many sessions at same casino, never seems to recover any of the RTP it is suppose to pay on average.
Koi Princess , what happened after the update, the slot runs terrible terrible, very gimpy reels now too. Used to like this slot.
Planet of the Apes, this slot was one of the biggest letdowns for me as I had really high expectations for it.

Anyway Netent is a very decent company who deliver some good slots from time to time but not everything is gold of course.

Nice to see you around and I hope we will be able to have an active Netent rep around.

 

[lotusch]

Speaking of Mirror Mirror and other similar games, hitting a bonus and getting a coin win instead of freespins isn't exactly fun. Would much prefer fewer bonuses, it's not like we're not used to the 1/460ish of Bonanza by now.

That's great and interesting input thank you! Does everyone else agree?

Oh yes I fully agree on that, the games where you win a COIN WIN if you have to choose between 3 options.
I so hate that. I want the free spins or the bonus game.
What is the point of a coin win.
If I trigger a feature I would love to play a feature.

So I 100% agree on this.

 

[zap987]

There are plenty of Netent Games that can pay well over 300x, and the same goes for other providers, but that is not something you will see every session: i know you're a long time player, and you must realize you were quite lucky to hit both those winsd on Dragon's Treasure and Knight's life in one session: those are absolutely high variance games, so in the same category as DOA. If you were looking at a lot of the other Netent Slots, you'd have to compare them to similar Slots from other providers..which is not really possible with Merkur.

It maybe down to samplesize, as i have been steadily playing Netent over the years, and i have had my fair share of 300x wins and higher, from Games such as Drive, Stickers, NRVNA, J&TB, Planet of the Apes, Jumanji, Mirror Mirror, and even Hansel and Gretel, and i could list about 40 more, no kidding.

That's my point though, Netent just has very few games that have any reasonable chance to pay even that much. Yes, some of their older games are fine. And yes even some of their newer games CAN pay, but the chance is just way too low. If I sit down to play, I'll just very rarely end up choosing a Netent game because they have very few options with a math model I enjoy.

 

[Steviedoo]

Thank you for your presence here.


Can you tell us why Canadians aren’t allowed to play your games in the first place ?

 

[trancemonkey]

Hello All,

I'm not overly active on CM as I would like, I'm trying to fix this (although life tends to throw curve balls!). I've introduced myself in some other threads in the board, but I'd like to do it more openly.

I'm the Games Product Director at NetEnt (yes, my details have been verified by Bryan). I've been at the company just over 5 Months and I've been getting my head around things as you do in a good job.

I've been in the Industry, both land and online collectively for about 12 years mainly around slot games and games design - so I've been around a bit at least.

I wanted to explicitly reach out to the CM community and ask you for some feedback. I know this could turn into a bit of a free for all but to at least attempt to add some structure:

What are we doing that we should stop?
What are we doing that we should keep doing?
What aren't we doing that we should be?

Game Features you like, dislike.
User Interface and User Experience stuff that is driving you crazy good or crazy bad about our games

I realise that I have opened up to taking a beating which I'm always prepared to take, but in the spirit of transparency that this post stands for:

1. Any overly derogatory posts without constructive criticism I will simply slow clap and move on...
2. NetEnt is a public listed company, and there a just some things that I cannot reveal or talk about - especially big future facing stuff. I'm not doing it to be rude, mean, arrogant or dodgy - its just that people's jobs and careers depend on these rules to be adhered to. TranceMonkey knows I'm an honorable fella (at least I hope he does!) so I will truly do my best!

A couple of popular questions I can perhaps answer upfront:

We are going back to Canada, we are trying to get there are fast as we can. I do not have a games list yet, we will soon and I will reveal it/if and when I can! It is not easy to get back there...

We HAVE NOT changed the Math Model on DoA. Really, WE. HAVE. NOT. We are looking at the DoA game itself (outside of the math/server) to see what we can do to it to make it truer to the original Flash version. Stay tuned...but if you have feedback surrounding this outside of the scatter issue raised all over the web, then I'm all ears!

Deep breath and here come the latex gloves....be gentle!

Cheers!

Burg

I can indeed confirm you are, sir Now you can take the same kind of verbal beating I have. Haha

 

[trancemonkey]

CFTBL - I'll look into it. Again I would seriously doubt we have changed anything but I'll check. We don't do that unless we have things like regulation changes which is pretty rare.

Can you tell me if you fired the person responsible for destroying the Twin Spin brand with the abomination that is Twin Spin Deluxe... Or at the very least demoted them to coffee-maker for life

 

[lotusch]

Can you tell me if you fired the person responsible for destroying the Twin Spin brand with the abomination that is Twin Spin Deluxe... Or at the very least demoted them to coffee-maker for life

Sssssst maybe it was the man on the forum here himself..
Yes I have to agree, that slot is bad..
Got a max reel connector with Aces I believe and I think it only paid something like 125x stake?
I thought I was going to get a whopping win.

 

[shaltar]

Hi and Welcome to CM.

We are going back to Canada, we are trying to get there are fast as we can. I do not have a games list yet, we will soon and I will reveal it/if and when I can! It is not easy to get back there...

Here's my questions:

1. Would it be exclusively by Province Online Casino such as Playnow or Espace Jeux or will the games be available to Canadian in any Casino.
2. If it's only in Province Online Casinos will Loto-Quebec get them??????

 

[goatwack]

Never once thought Netent would mess with Twin Spin, I always had it down as one of their 'classic' IPs, not to be meddled with

It's like taking DOA and mixing it with Starburst or something!

wait

no

don't even think it Netent!!

 

[pinnit2014]

Never once thought Netent would mess with Twin Spin, I always had it down as one of their 'classic' IPs, not to be meddled with

It's like taking DOA and mixing it with Starburst or something!

wait

no

don't even think it Netent!!

They can call it Deathstar

Max win 100 x

 

[jukkasd]

O hey @burgstrom ! Could you forward this on right person on your office? Thanks, and welcome!
Reel steal visual bug ?

 

[slotmaster]

Can you tell me if you fired the person responsible for destroying the Twin Spin brand with the abomination that is Twin Spin Deluxe... Or at the very least demoted them to coffee-maker for life

LOL once again trance sounds like me.