Nifty29
Dormant account
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2001
I don't want a bonus, and I know that many people here don't want bonuses either, as evidenced by this poll (30% consider them the "bane of the industry"). One of the big reasons that I don't like them is that, even if I don't take a bonus at a bonus casino, I'm still paying for other people's bonuses. The money for those bonuses has to come from somewhere, and I don't think it surprising that Pinnacle has the highest RTP's of any casino that I've played while also not offering any SUB.
But if you want a bonus, then you want a bonus. For that, I'm all about Nordicbet. I like Net Entertainment's software and Nordicbet is the best NetEnt casino on the web. Their slots are shockingly pretty. The "flow" of their card games is also nice.
You ignore the fact that almost 70% DO want bonuses Nice mention of Pinnacle again too
Some other things to consider:
Those credentials put literally every other casino that I can think of to shame.
- Pinnacle is accredited out the wazoo with the AGCC, Certified Fair Gambling, and iTech Labs.
- They are the #1 Sportsbook at Sportsbook Review.
- They have years worth of fully adumbrated RTP auditing reports (Any other casinos with that?).
- They willingly publish more information than ANY other casino on the Internet. It's not even a contest.
- They are so big, their exiting of the American market was a significant enough event to garner an article in The Washington Post,
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now., where he called it "probably the biggest and best bookmaking operation in the world -- and maybe in the history of the world."
- Their software provider, Galewind, famously paid a player who was shafted by a casino running their software. An event chronicled in this very forum.
- The Wizard of Odds stated
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.of Galewind's software "If any other software company has gone so far in the interests of fair and honest gambling, I'm not aware of it."
As such, their lack of CM accreditation matters little to me.
I don't give a toss if it matters to you, especially given the fact that you promote them in just about every post you make. I already know that it doesn't.
You like them - we got that memo weeks ago. No problem. However, your constant mentioning of them and spruiking their wares and software provider makes it appear very much like you're a.....well I won't use that word.
I'm curious as to why you are also constantly pointing the finger at how poor the accredited list is at CM. It's becoming very clear that you have some kind of agenda, but I am not yet sure what it is. I'm sure time will reveal all. I find it odd that, given you seem to have so many issues with the CM standards, you would want to participate here. Still, as I said, time will reveal.
So, to clarify, Pinnacle Sports/Galewind are not accredited here at CM (for those newbs who might be convinced that the huge amount of publicity here lately indicates otherwise).