How to win at Roulette

[Sentinel]

I am starting this thread to illustrate how I have been beating the game of Roulette for 11 years now. I have two strategies that I use the first one I will go into depth about is my bread and butter strategy. It has long proven itself to me. And was first formulated 11 years ago after intense analysis on the behaviour of the dozens section in roulette. It is called THE ZONE.

Basic rules...
(01) A dozen must not be hit for four consecutive spins to qualify.

(02) If a dozen is hit four times consecutively causing twin qualifiers, the bet is void UNLESS one of the dozens lost its two previous games.

(03) Staking plan to cover the spins 5---8 is as follows 1,1,2,3

(04) I advise you start with a bankroll of at least 200 points.

(05) You ideally should wait until there has been a losing game before you commence betting.

(06) Your goal ideally is one win per session

(07) I would advise you to play no more than three sessions per day

(08) As your bankroll grows so does the value of a point.

Okay there are some spectacular phenomenons this strategy throws up. The two extremes make it as close to a GRAIL as I have yet seen in roulette. It has a strike rate never lower than 66% per 100 games, and can go as high as 80% You can win more than 15 times in a row with the zone. But its power comes from what I am about to tell you. And this may be the most important sentence you EVER read regarding GAMBLING/ROULETTE. THE ZONE RARELY LOSES MORE THAN 4 GAMES IN A ROW. Yes you just read correct. You could go years without ever seeing the following 11,9,18,10,14.Especially if you limit yourself to 3 short sessions per day as I DO. What this represents is a virtual LOSS limit. Of course someone could say 30 reds or blacks is a virtual limit. But you could spend a very long time wating for it. Its unworkable.

With the ZONE, you get losing sequences like say 11,12 or ocassionally 09,17,10. even four losses in a row happen from time to time. But Five. NO ,I have been hit by one 5 loss in 11 years and seen two others, and thats from 10s of thousands of games played. If you follow this strategy EXACTLY as I advise over the coming weeks I assure you, you will BEAT THE GAME OF ROULETTE. As I have done for eleven years now later I will post the results for three sessions played today.

The quality you need above all else is PATIENCE, without it you don't stand a chance of beating roulette. And what do most human beings lack? If you have the right qualities and follow what I will impart on this thread I absolutely assure you, you will never consider ROULETTE unbeatable ever again...

 

[Pulver]

Why is this s**tt allowed in the skill section?

 

[Sentinel]

what is skill?

Got a better strategy? I'm ready,

 

[Da_Gambla]

Why is this s**tt allowed in the skill section?

Since there is no skill in roulette possible (you are not playing against other humans), I guess no roulette related articles should be in this section?

Almost every roulette player relies on some sort of `system`, whether it's a number/sequence system, a wagering/money management system, or a hybrid of both.

What exactly offends you about his post? He's not selling anything that I can see...

- Keith

 

[petro]

There is no skill involved in roulette.
Nor are there any strategies for the game.
Place your bet and cross your fingers is the only way.

 

[Sentinel]

Well said I am revealing what might be thè the best betting strategy ever devised. FOR NOTHING, the open minded who want to learn something will at least test it for themselves,the sceptics who are closed books will instanstly dismiss,if they didn't know of it or create it themselves it can't be any good.If I even show one open minded person roulette is beatable ive done my job...

 

[Sentinel]

There is no skill involved in roulette.
Nor are there any strategies for the game.
Place your bet and cross your fingers is the only way.

So now explain how I win everyday for years without crossing my fingers.

 

[Da_Gambla]

Well said I am revealing what might be thè the best betting strategy ever devised. FOR NOTHING, the open minded who want to learn something will at least test it for themselves,the sceptics who are closed books will instanstly dismiss,if they didn't know of it or create it themselves it can't be any good.If I even show one open minded person roulette is beatable ive done my job...

Systems and strategies are welcome in roulette, as it breaks up the monotony. They only become harmful when marketed in such a way as to make someone believe they are unbeatable.

If you flip a coin, you have a 50% chance of it being heads or tails. If it is heads, the next flip does NOT increase in odds in favor of tails. No matter how many times you do flip heads, the next flip is still a 50% chance. That's because the coin does not know that it was flipped, nor does it know how many other coins in the world were flipped, and ultimately when it should land on tails.

Dozens in roulette also have no such memory. Any outcome in roulette is sheer luck, no matter what anyone says. After saying that, I'm also human, so when I do play roulette, I do use strategies and systems designed to help keep me in the game, money-wise. Money management strategies are valid in any gambling situation, and roulette is no different.

Playing dozens in roulette is absolutely no different than flipping a 3-sided coin. Each flip has no idea what the previous flip was, so the odds have not changed for the next flip. Period.

Many `systems` prove profitable over short games. Getting out while you're ahead is a good system for any game. Good gaming decisions made by you, when luck has shone on you, does not mean your system `beat` the game.

I am not offended by anyone posting roulette strategies, as long as they are not linked to a site that then tries to sell something marketed as 'guaranteed to win'.

- Keith

 

[hobbithumper]

"system"

As with any roulette system, I always ask the following, simple questions:

1) Define the word "random"

2) Explain how your "system" works in relation to the proper definition of "random".

3) Look up the actual definition of "random" in a dictionary.

4) Apologise for wasting everybody's time.


Next, how to beat "heads or tails", an expert's view.

Seriously, unless the wheel is not random, previous spins have no memory, every spin of the wheel is a new spin. Beating roulette means a +EV spin. Don't beat yourselves up, you believe you are right, we believe we are right, meanwhile the casinos keep spinning the wheel and laughing. The only way to win at roulette is own a wheel & bring in people who believe they have a system. I'll take house edge over patterns in a random sequence every time.

 

[Sentinel]

RESULTS FOR 25/01/11
SESSION 1=QUALIFYING GAME LOST 13
BET 1,1,2=WIN AT SPIN 7.=2 POINTS PROFIT

CLOSING BALANCE 324 POINTS

 

[petro]

So now explain how I win everyday for years without crossing my fingers.

Your chances of winning at roulette "everyday for years" is 0%.

Good lucky convincing anyone otherwise.

 

[Sentinel]

As with any roulette system, I always ask the following, simple questions:

1) Define the word "random"

2) Explain how your "system" works in relation to the proper definition of "random".

3) Look up the actual definition of "random" in a dictionary.

4) Apologise for wasting everybody's time.


Next, how to beat "heads or tails", an expert's view.

Seriously, unless the wheel is not random, previous spins have no memory, every spin of the wheel is a new spin. Beating roulette means a +EV spin. Don't beat yourselves up,


you believe you are right, we believe we are right, meanwhile the casinos keep spinning the wheel and laughing. The only way to win at roulette is own a wheel & bring in people who believe they have a system. I'll take house edge over patterns in a random sequence every time.

Yes so random its unable to produce a losing streak of more than four once every several thousand games I play.You are thinking for yourself, im not trying to guess I already know the way to win you cannot prove Im wrong, because that requires some actual effort.

 

[LaHutti]

Random ?? ... That's somewhere in Russia, right ?
I thought only the casinos played the "random card", when someone tells them, that their games are not fair ...lol

 

[Sentinel]

Your chances of winning at roulette "everyday for years" is 0%.

Good lucky convincing anyone otherwise.

I'm willing and able to prove it ur too lazy to find out I'm right all it will require is a little self testing on your part WHAT ARE YOU SCARED OF.?????

 

[Pulver]

If you have found a way to turn sand into gold/beat the roulette wheel, why are you not the richest man on earth?

I have a friend that tried to convince me that he had found a way to beat the roulette wheel. He had found it on an ebook he said, and it worked, because he was up thousands. I tried to explain to him basic mathematic concepts to proove why he was wrong. And as I also explained to him. If someone found a way to make gold out of sand, why would they make an ebook about it and put it on the net? That would make gold worthless.

My friend did not wan't to hear what I had to say. But suddenly he stopped talking about is moneymaking roulette system. About a year after he admitted to me, while drunk, that he was wrong and that he had lost the money eventually.

Roulette is not a beatable game in the long run. You talk about taking short sessions. The roulette wheel has no memory. All your play is to be considered as a lifelong session.

You seem like you have made up your mind, and I wouldn't bother arguing with you if it were not for the fact that you are posting in the skill section, and making it sound like roulette is a moneymaking machine for other readers. Casinomeister is a respected forum, and I know that readers on here rely on things that are written. If "wronglearning" like this goes unsaid, people can be potentially burned.

Roulette can be fun, and I play it myself from time to time. But it is important to remember that the house has an edge, and that every single spin is an independent action. There are no system that can beat roulette in the long run.

 

[Sentinel]

Pulver put everything you think you know about roulette to one side for a moment,I don't want you OR ANYONE to take what I say as the gospel I WANT YOU TO *TEST* IT for yourself and then come back and see if you can tell me its no good roulette can't be beaten.Are you up for that,? Why am I sharing? Because the zone is for the small percentage of people who are disciplined and patient. And that means very few,the question is are you scared to find out mathematicians are wrong?

 

[Da_Gambla]

Yes so random its unable to produce a losing streak of more than four once every several thousand games I play.You are thinking for yourself, im not trying to guess I already know the way to win you cannot prove Im wrong, because that requires some actual effort.

Ok friend, we are trying to be reasonable with you...

You posted a 2 PART `system` or strategy.

Part one is number (or sequence) selection.

and

Part two is what to do if part one wins.

Part two is known as 'snipering' a win. If you win a few quick wagers, run with the money. This is VALID, and valid for ANY game, not just roulette. It's called discipline, and has nothing to do with part one.

Part one is NOT valid, and this is FACT. Tying the success of part one to part two does not make part one any more successful. If you apply ANY sequence selection system to part two, you will have some short-term successes.

Here's the flaw in everything you've posted:

1. If your sequence selection (part one) was truly successful, it wouldn't require part two. You could play it over and over and over again, and you would never have to stop. Why do you have to stop? Because over a longer time period, it would eventually lose. Any sequence selection system fits right in here, yours is NO different. Because of the nature of roulette, almost 100% of the sequence selection systems are based on the invalid ideal that something that hasn't happened over x number of spins is 'due'. This is 100% factually untrue.

2. If this strategy was so successful, after 11 years of using it, you would be an independently wealthy multi-millionaire, and would not bother posting this to a Forum full of completely random strangers.

3. If this strategy was so successful, and after posting it for so many random strangers to use, eventually the game of roulette would have to cease to exist, because it was found to be beatable over a lifetime. All the casinos in the world cannot afford to pay all of us this many millions of dollars worth of wins.

You, my friend, have failed. While I found your original post entertaining and full of value for a casual roulette player looking to relax, by trying to sell it as a 'holy grail' just plummeted your integrity to a sub-zero place amongst a Forum full of some the most professional gamblers you are likely to ever run into. Grats on that...

- Keith

 

[Da_Gambla]

Pulver put everything you think you know about roulette to one side for a moment,I don't want you OR ANYONE to take what I say as the gospel I WANT YOU TO *TEST* IT for yourself and then come back and see if you can tell me its no good roulette can't be beaten.Are you up for that,? Why am I sharing? Because the zone is for the small percentage of people who are disciplined and patient. And that means very few,the question is are you scared to find out mathematicians are wrong?

Why do you need Pulver, or anyone at CM to 'test' your system? You have tested it for 11 years. Using this, as your logic to why you have posted it, is illogical.

Mathematicians may be wrong on some things, this is not one of them, or this game that has existed for this long, would not exist further. The fact that the game not only survives, but thrives, proves mathematicians have this one nailed. You really picked the wrong forum to be trying all of this hogwash...

- Keith

 

[Sentinel]

Keith, what is the biggest failing amongst gamblers? You are trying to get me out of here I understand that,I already know THE ZONE is the best strãtegy ive ever seen in roulette, you cherry picked parts of my posts in an attempt to discredit me. But heres the clincher not you EINSTEIN or any mathematician on this planet can explain why the random game cannot producè a streak like this more than once every several thousand spins for the dozens 11,13,14,20,16 and that is what makes the zone as close to a grail as you will ever see. And yes I make my living from it. Research it properly bub and come back to appologize..

 

[Pulver]

Keith, what is the biggest failing amongst gamblers? Your trying to get me out of here I understand that,I already know THE ZONE is the best strãtegy ive ever seen in roulette, you cherry picked parts of my posts in an attempt to discredit me. But heres the clincher not you EINSTEIN or any mathematician on this planet can explain why the random game cannot producè a streak like this more than once every several thousand spins for the dozens 11,13,14,20,16 and that is what makes the zone as close to a grail as you will ever see. And yes I make my living from it. Research it properly bub and come back to appologize..

If that is your take on things I suggest that you open an account with 32 Red or Ladbrokes, ask for your limits to be increased by 100 times and then you can break them using your system and become a very wealthy man.

If it all goes wrong, we tried to warn you.

 

[Sentinel]

Pulver this is what you can't digest one no casino will allow that ive been bullied in real casinos before once they know that you've got them like keith they want you gone in a hurry. You won't believe me because ur brainwashed by mathsheads,thats why I keep saying prove to urself the zone is great. But after greed the average gamblers next failings are lazyness,lack of discipline the train of thought is its gambling,why should I have to work that hard. I've studied and played this game for 15 years.My ultimate goal is to prove that mathematicians missed something.

AND IN FACT ROULETTE, CAN BE SYSTEMACTICALLY BEATEN, and I will by the time I'm. Done...

 

[Da_Gambla]

AND IN FACT ROULETTE, CAN BE SYSTEMACTICALLY BEATEN, and I will by the time I'm. Done...

Only been 11 yrs, how many more, you figure?

- Keith

 

[funeral979]

LOL

These roulette threads always make me laugh.

To be honest, I have been gambling for about 12 years, and I never wagered one penny on the game of roulette, online or at a B&M. It just doesn't interest me. I have to wonder though, why is it that these roulette system threads pop up on here from time to time? You never see the foolproof craps systems....or baccarat systems...its always roulette.

I suppose they are a really passionate bunch, and I guess you have to admire that somewhat....

But as another poster said earlier, if any casino game was beatable, it wouldn't be on the casino floor today, and you wouldn't be here telling us about it...

 

[Da_Gambla]

LOL

These roulette threads always make me laugh.

To be honest, I have been gambling for about 12 years, and I never wagered one penny on the game of roulette, online or at a B&M. It just doesn't interest me. I have to wonder though, why is it that these roulette system threads pop up on here from time to time? You never see the foolproof craps systems....or baccarat systems...its always roulette.

I suppose they are a really passionate bunch, and I guess you have to admire that somewhat....

But as another poster said earlier, if any casino game was beatable, it wouldn't be on the casino floor today, and you wouldn't be here telling us about it...

It's a relaxing game, it's not for everyone.. hehe

This guy doesn't like me breaking down his `system` into the various parts for individual scrutiny, because he knows that any scheme of this sort is only as strong as its weakest link. He is trying to promote the strongest link, the wagering progression and win snipering.

If he left that part out, and just came here to discuss the probability behind the selected wager(s), he would have already been hauled out to the dumpster. It is, in this way, that these shucksters can then throw out any claims of losses by anyone who tries the scheme. He will say 'you didn't wager right', 'you quit too soon', or 'you didn't quit soon enough'. The whole success depends on the luck of the win, and the timing of entry and exit. This then provides about 3 too many variables for this to be awarded the title of 'holy grail'. It is what it is. I had some fun, and now we wait for the next system genius to roll on in... :lolsign:

- Keith

 

[Sentinel]

Keith what are you worried about? You are far from exposing me as some. Charlatan of.ROULETTE All of you anwser your own ? You have to actually run a. Winning strategy. Before you can make a change,with brainwashed jaded people like you that's never going to happen,I do realize that.


I will.garner change in a few open minded over time.PEOPLE who actually Can be bothered to do some testing on pa to find out if I'm telling. the. Truth or not. Never said anyone has to play. Real money. I myself proofed the zone on paper for over a year.THE WEAK link is humans themselves...