external image

Official Hi! We are Nolimit City!

Max Win Caps is a way to control the game and its pay outs and also not have some stupid combination that is just insane and never really achievable (RTP stealer). We cap them differently because the characteristics of the games are also quite different, so it makes sense to have them set differently. The actual Max Win cap is always very far in - but it also makes us able to say how frequent it is - 1 in 14 million rounds or 1 in 2 billion.

It's also a max risk exposure for our customers, as they want to be sure of the max exposure on a game given a specific bet. Some operators choose different max bets depending on the max exposure it self.

On a fun note, we try at times to set the max win caps to a number that has a reference with something within the game, for example:
- El Paso, 44.440x - as Stoudenmire carried two .44 caliber revolvers.
- xWays Hoarder, 11.030x - the average amount of shit that a man produces in a life time.
- Infectious 5, 55.555x - Well, 5 is pretty self explanatory in this game.

Some new market regulations demands that you set the frequency of the max wins, and that becomes a bit odd with what we did previously with the simulated max win without a max win cap. We've never stated any "theoretic max win" (which is just stupid), we've always simulated them - from around 10 billion rounds. Then we pick the highest simulated win as the "simulated max win". The frequency of that simulated max win was the 1 in 10 billion rounds, but it doesn't say anything about that win that was maybe 10x below the max win - for me it wouldn't really matter if I won 11.020x or 11.030x ...

The old way of doing the max win simulations meant that a game can actually pay out higher than that simulated number - we've seen it in a few games over the years in the industry. It's that isn't really fancied by the operator...

Ok I see, thanks so much for the detailed answer and reply. Appreciate it :)
 
First five features paid as follows, all naturally achieved (no feature buys). Took around 2000 spins or so. In that time balance decreased by 780x stake.

Each was a three scatters trigger.

0.6x
1.5x
133x
23x
50x

Base game is an exercise in frustration, with multiplying wilds and the horizontal/vertical splits missing constantly. Didn't hit a 50x stop trigger in the base game.

Feature itself can be equally annoying, unless you get the xWays persisting on 2-3-4 be prepared to watch a lot of dead spins in the feature.

The knocking symbols out mechanic looks like it could be interesting but it didn't get past the first knockout level in any of those features.

I have no motivation to do more.
 
It's not up on Spotify just yet, that will take a while. But it's available in the promo pack. It doesn't really have a name yet - as it's done in-house by our sound dude. Lovely tune!
I tip my hat to him then. It has a really chilled vibe and sounds like something Stanley Clarke could have done in the late 60's. ?
 
summer_vibe_karen_wide (2).webp



May as well have just called the game 'Snickers' and have been done with it :oops: :laugh:

(Thanks @dave1888 for pointing it out)
 
Sure NLC slots can kill a bankroll in the blink of an eye and many bonuses pay nothing but I simply love them. The high volatility nature of their games makes play extremely exciting. You just never know you could be that next big winner.
Yeah love them but they stopped loving us Aussies and aren't available any more :(
 
As usual you guys are so disrespectful I dont even understand why the rep still posts anything in this forum. San Quentin is still the slot I played to most by a landslide in 2021. I was crushing it in the beginning and got raped numerous times after that. Still an awesome game. The goal is to take your money in a way or another. I think NLC are honest and fair about their offer and give you an opportunity to enjoy burning your money that exceeds the pleasure offered by almost every other provider. Just don’t get the goal in telling his new game is shit every time he takes the time to post here. Might as well send him a d1ck pic with your number on it :)
 
For me, Hoarder is definitely a step-up from Infectious 5, as I don't really like comic book/super heroes themed anything.

@NolimitCity - Pelle
What other slot themes are in the pipeline?

Also, big-ups to your sound dude. He's an amazing asset to your studio.. especially for what he did with East Coast West Coast!
The sound to that slot is what makes it what it is for sure.
 
@Najasaki - We're closing in on summer time and hopefully some vacation, but that might be chopped in to little pieces with all the stuff we've got going on. Next games are "Mental" followed by "Das xBoot" - I'm sure those games will stir up some comments as well.

I love our sound dudes, they're awesome. And they do get alot of praise for their work in forums like CM. Well-earned praise in my book.
 
Last edited:
It's an incredibly volatile game, at 40c spins with a $100 bankroll you've only got 250x your stake to play with, this game will go through 750-1000x stake like a knife through butter.

Too volatile for me, my previous tussle with it in real money mode (video above) will be my last.

And for those who have feature buys available to them, watch out for those too, they're just as volatile as the game itself.

(I believe all the biggest wins on the leaderboard for this game were from feature buys, denoted by the 'flash' icon next to the replay.)
 
@Najasaki - We're closing in on summer time and hopefully some vacation, but that might be chopped in to little pieces with all the stuff we've got going on. Next games are "Mental" followed by "Das xBoot" - I'm sure those games will stir up some comments as well.

I love our sound dudes, they're awesome. And they do get alot of praise for their work in forums like CM. Well-earned praise in my book.
Can you make some of your next games with a minimum stake of 10p?
These new games rinse your balance and some of us only get small amounts.
TIA
 
@NolimitCity - Pelle I seriously have to ask what kind of drugs you guys were taking when creating hoarder ? I mean if getting 2 scatters on reels 2-4 takes about 500 spins on average.. And getting actually 3 is harder than getting GOLD + 5 +5 on bonanza ? Also when you get feature without buying it = 3 scatters it pays nothing 99% of the time... for me 100% of the time . What is wrong with you guys ?
 
I wouldn’t bother tbh, the reps cherry pick what posts to reply to, any criticism is ignored.
The recent games you have produced are ridiculous, purely made for streamers. No thought whatsoever given to the normal player, especially those in the UK who can’t utilise the bonus buy.
Plenty of other slots have enhanced features, multi features that trigger sometimes, you feel you could have a chance of a trigger in normal gameplay. El Paso, San Quentin, Hoarder absolutely no chance unless it’s bought.
Until you listen to the normal player, many of which have commented over the time you have been on here which you have ignored, you will always get criticised.
Tombstone, Deadwood Slot, Punk Rocker have “enhanced” features that have realistic chances to hit. Can you not engineer the other games to be so?
The Wasteland spins in Hoarder have no realistic chance of being experienced unless you buy it and trigger it.
Pathetic
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi, I play Nolimit slots a lot, I will describe my experience on Hoarder (Bushido similar) based on a massive experience in real mode with bonus purchase (I play only with bonus purchase), then I will write an analysis on Infectious 5 because both for me have configuration errors.
On Hoarder the maximum bonus costs 777 times the stake, the volatility is very high, most of the maximum bonuses have returned me 20/30% of the purchase cost which can also fit on slots that have a very high volatility but not with a cost of 777 times the bet, let me explain better.
I can't pay a bonus 777 times the bet when it very often pays me back less than half the cost with the maximum payout equal to 11030 times the bet, which is 14.19 maximum bonus.
The cost of the bonus should consider both the average and the maximum winnings, in this specific case it does does not consider either of them.
To make a bonus pay 777 times the average win even downwards ok but it should reach at least 50%, but this absolutely does not happen, same problem as Bushido where the cost of the maximum bonus is 700 times the stake but the average payout for me it was below 50%.
I'm sorry to say, but for Hoarder and Bushido, for what has been my experience the cost of the maximum bonus is absolutely disproportionate to what it returns, with the aggravating circumstance that Hoarder has the maximum payout which is only 14.19 times the cost of the maximum bonus, too bad because with the previous slots like Deadwood the game with the bonus purchase is much more balanced , and I'm talking about the minimum bonus (even worse).
Then maybe with Hoarder I could suddenly reach also the
maximum payout but it is too low compared to the cost of the highest bonus.
On Infectious 5 I will write another post with an in-depth analysis, as I have purchased about 1000 bonuses of which 200 Mayhem (always in real of course) and it produces too repetitive maximum payout patterns (Mayhem) , with maximum winnings that are not proportionate between the various types of bonuses, which on the one hand might seem a better random, but on the other hand it does not protect the player who risks the most.
Greetings.
 
Regarding Infectious 5, I post the links of the replay of my best wins with the Mayhem, they are 5 videos, each video a big win with 810 lines of the top symbol, so always 3 reels x 3, a reel x 5, a reel x 6 , all winnings between 3317x and 3356x, always the same scheme, I wonder but possible not that I could not go beyond 810 lines at least once, also considering there were other occasions to overcome this limit but obviously he missed a reel.
If you have a laugh about my clone bonuses:






Winning pattern too static, five times the same maximum payout is too much, random too repetitive.
Then I see the ranking of the winnings and the top 10 (but surely they will be even more) have reached 55.555x, but it is possible that with 200 bonus Mayhem has not managed to reach even a tenth of the maximum win.
Very disappointing.
A greeting.
 
I wouldn’t bother tbh, the reps cherry pick what posts to reply to, any criticism is ignored.
The recent games you have produced are ridiculous, purely made for streamers. No thought whatsoever given to the normal player, especially those in the UK who can’t utilise the bonus buy.
Plenty of other slots have enhanced features, multi features that trigger sometimes, you feel you could have a chance of a trigger in normal gameplay. El Paso, San Quentin, Hoarder absolutely no chance unless it’s bought.
Until you listen to the normal player, many of which have commented over the time you have been on here which you have ignored, you will always get criticised.
Tombstone, Deadwood, Punk Rocker have “enhanced” features that have realistic chances to hit. Can you not engineer the other games to be so?
The Wasteland spins in Hoarder have no realistic chance of being experienced unless you buy it and trigger it.
Pathetic

Must agree, I have a saying for Nolimit City games:

Any game post-Deadwood is deadwood :) And I love NLC slots.

As a UK player, super bonuses from NLC on San Quentin and such are off my bucket list.

Especially when studios like Hacksaw for example offer realistic chances of landing stupidly volatile bonuses from standard play.

Just don't play them. There's tons of slots on NetEnt's and other provider's catalogues that I simply veer away from and there's
ones that I stick to. If the volatility on the new NoLimit City games are too much for you to handle, ignore them on your future sessions
because they're simply not for you.

Bonus buying is just a different level of gambling, IMO. You have your traditional grinding to achieve a bonus and you have the different
strategy/layer of gambling, which is buying it outright. On Hoarders, you can even gamble the bonus buy with a chance at getting one of the
3 types of bonuses, (the odds of landing each are clearly displayed upon purchasing) at a reduced cost than purchasing the most premium.

If I resided in the U.K. like you did and bonus buys were not available to me, heck, I wouldn't play the newer titles as much because I'm
extremely impatient.. however, I have played the newer titles recently and landed a bonus within 20 spins or less on several occasions
without buying a bonus... It's just luck.

Also, what's criticizing the rep's hard work going to really do? They're not going to pull the titles out because a few people are
upset that the games are way too volatile. They have a vision for their products and they have dedicated players that will play them.. and
as a result, they've built quite the name for themselves in the online gaming industry.
 
The good thing about this provider are the graphics. While BTG is still recycling the letter symbols, sounds and whatever they can, this one truly leads in amazing graphics. But Im not in a casino to play videogames. These games are absolutely dead in base game and the bonus buys taken to the extreme does not return what one would expect, actually its damn hard to make a positive return on a bonus buy on these slots. 50% return is a bless. Playing them without is like watching the paint dry, nothing happens other than balance disappearing in the search for the scatters and the teases are disgusting. Casinos must love this greedy provider and their 5 scatter buy. Reasons for which this provider goes to the personal bin in which notent and redtiger sits for years gaining mold. If you make your games play like Merkur and Novos then once in a while I should have hits like on those providers in normal spins. I like a few extreme variance challenges, ones in which i dont feel ripped off.
 
The good thing about this provider are the graphics. While BTG is still recycling the letter symbols, sounds and whatever they can, this one truly leads in amazing graphics. But Im not in a casino to play videogames. These games are absolutely dead in base game and the bonus buys taken to the extreme does not return what one would expect, actually its damn hard to make a positive return on a bonus buy on these slots. 50% return is a bless. Playing them without is like watching the paint dry, nothing happens other than balance disappearing in the search for the scatters and the teases are disgusting. Casinos must love this greedy provider and their 5 scatter buy. Reasons for which this provider goes to the personal bin in which notent and redtiger sits for years gaining mold. If you make your games play like Merkur and Novos then once in a while I should have hits like on those providers in normal spins. I like a few extreme variance challenges, ones in which i dont feel ripped off.

Something happens.. unlike other providers has random feature these have random "fuck you" popping up ...
 
The graphics of these replays on this page send my not so new tablet into an absolute spasm, and that's without clicking on them.
Just thought I'd share that for anyone who isn't interested.
Aye, same - thought i was under cyber attack then realised that

a. i have no money to steal
b. my pictures aren't sexy enough to be sold online
 
Just don't play them. There's tons of slots on NetEnt's and other provider's catalogues that I simply veer away from and there's
ones that I stick to. If the volatility on the new NoLimit City games are too much for you to handle, ignore them on your future sessions
because they're simply not for you.

That's a fair point and I don't play the new ones with cash.

My post-Deadwood thing is based on experience. I still play NLC and still love their games and was hoping to get some feedback across in an attempt to rekindle our dying love not just have a moan off.

And, one burning question still lingers unanswered from this thread which puts me off of them, nothing to do with the volatility. Hacksaw will chew through your wallet quicker than most NLC.

But, their bonuses hit bigger more often for me and I've been fortunate enough to have super bonuses from normal play, something I miss from NLC apart from once on Tombstone.

Should add, I've probably spun more on NLC for cash than any other developer.

Your right though, plenty more fish in the sea. Especially nowadays, studios popping up everywhere and decent ones too.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's a fair point and I don't play the new ones with cash.

My post-Deadwood thing is based on experience. I still play NLC and still love their games and was hoping to get some feedback across in an attempt to rekindle our dying love not just have a moan off.

And, one burning question still lingers unanswered from this thread which puts me off of them, nothing to do with the volatility. Hacksaw will chew through your wallet quicker than most NLC.

But, their bonuses hit bigger more often for me and I've been fortunate enough to have super bonuses from normal play, something I miss from NLC apart from once on Tombstone.

Should add, I've probably spun more on NLC for cash than any other developer.

Your right though, plenty more fish in the sea. Especially nowadays, studios popping up everywhere and decent ones too.

And exactly what you said about your experience with Hacksaw bonus buys, I've had quite the opposite experience with my purchases of the bonuses... especially that ghastly new Born Wild slot from Hacksaw, OMG.. I must of purchased at least 12 bonuses on that game and the returns have been in the range of 3X - 10X stake.

Stack Em'? forget about it... same goes for that new Hop 'n' Pop one.. disastrous. I still respect the titles but have learned my lesson with
buying their bonuses.

Now, I have stupidly purchased the 2000X stake bonus buy a few times on San Quentin when my balance was very healthy and I'm happy to report that I've learned my lesson there too. Like another poster stated, half the buy or less was the result almost every time with a couple rare occasions where it was a few bucks less than the actual bonus buy. I do know that there's potential to get a ridiculous result, but highly unlikely.

What I can say is that I respect the bonus buy options.. I've discovered through trial and error that they're for the most part NOT for me and like you, as a player, I appreciate the products that NoLimit City releases and the bellyaching about the volatility is rather lame IMO. (not saying that you're bellyaching ;)) We just need to respect titles instead of trashing them left and right and getting on a reps case for evading answering negative posts because those are guaranteed ways to lose a rep and make them hesitant from posting on here for good.
 
I'd love to be able to Bonus Buy and I think our style of play dictates our experiences on both games along with the experience we've had on a limited number of spins/bonus buys maybe.

If I could Bonus Buy I doubt I would on either NLC or Hacksaw, especially after what you just said about Hacksaw. Born Wild 93.8% also I think, not checked it on release or played it, just saying, too volatile, couldn't afford it.

My experience is from standard play, hence I stand by what I say, I have personally noticed a difference on all NLC titles following Deadwood and had better from Hacksaw in fewer spins.

You need feedback to be honest, good or bad, otherwise, what's the point.
 
We just need to respect titles instead of trashing them left and right

Your right there though doesn't help too much, although I would rather know if somebody thought my product was pants than not.

The smart thing would be to ask the poster to be more specific, mind you, that might get an even worse reply :)
 
Your right there though doesn't help too much, although I would rather know if somebody thought my product was pants than not.

The smart thing would be to ask the poster to be more specific, mind you, that might get an even worse reply :)

I agree. However... The provider probably already knows if they ended up creating a big pile of dog shit from the numbers of players that decide to play their new release. I assume it's easy to obtain those numbers from the casinos.. after all, we live in an algorithm world. Providers aren't dumb and understand the times and what players want for the most part. I find it hard to believe that a few negative Nancy's are going to change the trajectory of their path if the market is showing signs that players want high volatility, big paying games. The players who want low volatility, higher playtime should stick with Starburst.

Also, most of the posts that you're speaking about are bait traps. I wouldn't want to engage with their negativity either if I were them.

P.S. I miss your Austin Powers avatar.
 
Last edited:
You need feedback to be honest, good or bad, otherwise, what's the point.

Of course. But we're not talking about bad feedback anymore. We're talking about beating a dead horse.
"arrrrg, your slots are too volatile!!"
"arrrrrrrrggg, your bonus buys cost too much!"
"arrrrrrrrrgggggg, you guys should be jailed for feeding streamers fuel!!"
"arrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggg, your slots are way too hard to bonus on!!!"

All the same bullshit said different ways. Lame.
 
I said the same thing last year. It does feel like you’re being belittled/mocked with those no win animations. You just don’t see the funny side when you’re 100x down and being baited with ‘near misses’.

Have to say though, I almost choked on my coffee when I first saw that dropped soap reference ?
 
Tbh i don't agree with you guys on everything except for the fact that hoarders is complete shit. I never player NLC till el paso came out then infectious x ways became my favorite game of all time. I have hit 5 scatters in it once, won 200+ easily 5 times in the base game single spin 20c bet. Mayhem spins triggered in normal 3 scatter hit bonus game. Same for el paso. I've never done a feature buy except for one time on warrior graveyard where the 18$ cost for 25c free spins returned 88$. Hoarders is atrocious, never played san question
 
Tbh i don't agree with you guys on everything except for the fact that hoarders is complete shit. I never player NLC till el paso came out then infectious x ways became my favorite game of all time. I have hit 5 scatters in it once, won 200+ easily 5 times in the base game single spin 20c bet. Mayhem spins triggered in normal 3 scatter hit bonus game. Same for el paso. I've never done a feature buy except for one time on warrior graveyard where the 18$ cost for 25c free spins returned 88$. Hoarders is atrocious, never played san question

What exactly is it about Hoarders that you dislike?
 
Literally 12 hours after my previous comment my favorite game smashes again over 1000x bet 5 mins ago at unibet. NLC IS the GOAT , if you don't like a certain slot don't play it. Lol

Literally 12 hours after my previous comment my favorite game smashes again over 1000x bet 5 mins ago at unibet. NLC IS the GOAT , if you don't like a certain slot don't play it. Lol
View attachment 157234
Congrats , my best hits has been with NLC too , especially when you play with a bonus , NLC can guarantee you a withdrawal if you get lucky ...
 
Literally 12 hours after my previous comment my favorite game smashes again over 1000x bet 5 mins ago at unibet. NLC IS the GOAT , if you don't like a certain slot don't play it. Lol


Congrats , my best hits has been with NLC too , especially when you play with a bonus , NLC can guarantee you a withdrawal if you get lucky ...
What provider dont guarantee withdrawal if you get lucky ? Best comment ever :D
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top