I have to ask... What is basegame rtp on bushido xways ? I just requested my history at one casino i play at ... 6897 spins played and rtp stands at 36,89% ... I know their games are only for bonus buy but this must be joke
I wouldnt play Bushido ever mate! My personal recommendation based on 5000 spins, no bonus, no bigger win than 25x bet. Like all nlc games. In my finding over my tests of real play, is all about promo streamers. Dont expect same wins and prepare alot of cash, I mean alot of cash, at least min 2000x your bet, if you want to have some good longer run of fun play.I have to ask... What is basegame rtp on bushido xways ? I just requested my history at one casino i play at ... 6897 spins played and rtp stands at 36,89% ... I know their games are only for bonus buy but this must be joke
I wouldnt play Bushido ever mate! My personal recommendation based on 5000 spins, no bonus, no bigger win than 25x bet. Like all nlc games. In my finding over my tests of real play, is all about promo streamers. Dont expect same wins and prepare alot of cash, I mean alot of cash, at least min 2000x your bet, if you want to have some good longer run of fun play.
But how they can release game with 40% rtp ?
2 reps popped in in March and 1 early april; alive at leastBtw, anyone from NLC alive?
Yeah I did quit. Im not playing for real cash anymore just having fun life and I love games and designs. So why not throw in some ideas?Keep it realistic - too many wilds in view.
Also.. I thought you'd quit
You are not alone in that view. I love their designs, grittiness and artwork overall but I did meet them at ICE last week and expressed my doubts about Gulag, which I think is a step too far. They didn't have any mention or images of it on their stand it has to be said. Take a look at this opinion:I just see NLC as a provider that has absolutely no moral or ethical compass. It astounds me that they find it acceptable to 'mock' the atrocities of humankind and they find it acceptable - I just keep thinking 'sick mind' when I come across their slots inventory and I no longer play any of their games!
I read the article on GMBLRs and I can't get my head around the fact that NLC refuses to engage, on par with ignoring their customer base, which is nothing short of arrogance on their part.You are not alone in that view. I love their designs, grittiness and artwork overall but I did meet them at ICE last week and expressed my doubts about Gulag, which I think is a step too far. They didn't have any mention or images of it on their stand it has to be said. Take a look at this opinion:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
I'd be interested to know what they said when you questioned them about it...because it's pretty indefensible.You are not alone in that view. I love their designs, grittiness and artwork overall but I did meet them at ICE last week and expressed my doubts about Gulag, which I think is a step too far. They didn't have any mention or images of it on their stand it has to be said. Take a look at this opinion:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Well, to be fair Pelle and the others were very nice, approachable and seemed somewhat sheepish when I mentioned it. The decision to go ahead with it and not write off the dev costs (or more specifically the artwork and marketing costs) is clearly from the top and they acknowledged the controversy. I also pointed out that in games like Punk Rocker where some may have not liked the chimpanzee dressed up as our Queen for example that this wasn't their invention but that of Malcolm McLaren and the Sex Pistols back in 1977 in the Silver Jubilee year and the release of the single 'God Save The Queen' i.e. jubilee-Buckingham Palace-garden tea party-establishment invitees etc.I'd be interested to know what they said when you questioned them about it...because it's pretty indefensible.
A clear case of profit over morality, compassion and empathy towards all the descendants of those imprisoned within Gulags!!! Shocking!Well, to be fair Pelle and the others were very nice, approachable and seemed somewhat sheepish when I mentioned it. The decision to go ahead with it and not write off the dev costs (or more specifically the artwork and marketing costs) is clearly from the top and they acknowledged the controversy. I also pointed out that in games like Punk Rocker where some may have not liked the chimpanzee dressed up as our Queen for example that this wasn't their invention but that of Malcolm McLaren and the Sex Pistols back in 1977 in the Silver Jubilee year and the release of the single 'God Save The Queen' i.e. jubilee-Buckingham Palace-garden tea party-establishment invitees etc.
They riterated that their USP is their gritty themes and I did say that they've crossed the line because to me it's no different from say an Auschwitz theme where people were also murdered, tortured and starved.
The problem with this game is that for example Mental slot or San Quentin are representing generic stereotypes that people have about those establishments and what went on/goes on in them but Gulag is likely to have personal consequences for the descendants of potentially millions of real people whom in most cases were put there without committing anything we would call a crime today. One could argue that the inmates of San Quentin were there because they deserved to be, or in the the case of Mental the same was true for most inmates but the rest of the inmates society didn't have a clue how to treat or cure them back then. In neither case was there a deliberate and orchestrated intention to kill, torture, starve or enslave those who went through the gates unlike Gulags - that's where the difference lies in my view.
The problem with this game is that for example Mental slot or San Quentin are representing generic stereotypes that people have about those establishments and what went on/goes on in them but Gulag is likely to have personal consequences for the descendants of potentially millions of real people whom in most cases were put there without committing anything we would call a crime today. One could argue that the inmates of San Quentin were there because they deserved to be, or in the the case of Mental the same was true for most inmates but the rest of the inmates society didn't have a clue how to treat or cure them back then. In neither case was there a deliberate and orchestrated intention to kill, torture, starve or enslave those who went through the gates unlike Gulags - that's where the difference lies in my view.
I would agree with ChopleyIOM, the "rape" part of San Quentin was already a step too far.Can't agree with you there dunover.
For San Quentin and the rape 'joke' - (which I flagged up as indefensible in my video review of the slot when it was released, and here at CM) - first off stereotypes only become stereotypes when they'll lazily perpetuated as per the slot, and secondly, however much an inmate might 'deserve' to be in prison (and that's without even getting started on wrongful convictions or the inappropriateness of prison sentences for many crimes), their punishment is being in prison, not being raped.
Mental was another crapfest (I had two videos about that on my old channel, and said quite a bit about it here at CM too), and I'd really take issue with the idea that most people who were 'housed' in asylums deserved to be there. For example there are many conditions that we identify as disabilities today and treat as such, that in years gone by would see those people sent to asylums, where abuse and inhumane treatment was rife. And again, even if someone considers that people in asylums 'deserve' to be there, they were there for their own safety and the safety of others, not to be subjected to experimentation and brutal torture as depicted in Mental.
As such I'm not particularly surprised that NLC have seen fit to stoop even lower with this Gulag slot, the writing was on the wall for me from San Quentin onwards.