linda7
Non-Gambler
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2002
- Location
- Brooklyn, NY
glodge, I was not sarcastic in my post, I was honest. If the truth is seen by you as sarcasm, then that would be your problem not mine. Additionally, no I never heard that sarcasm was the lowest form of humour (humor). Is that why your opening line was SARCASTICALLY directed at me? Kindly let me know what casinos you are affiliated with, this way I make certain to NEVER patronize them. An additional heads up for you,
Wim and I communicate via email, as well. However, I do not feel the need to protect the FL group. If they are honest, they can take care of themselves. Apparently, you and I agree on one thing and one thing only, charge backs are wrong acts to commit, as it ruins gambling for the honorable player and does hurt online casinos.
Lastly, my post was being typed after I read your first post, and by the time I posted you had entered your second post. As much as I hate to be nice to you at this given moment, I will admit that had I read your second posting, I would have never bothered with mine. Your second post reflects the concerns of the player, which is what I thought this forum was all about. Protecting each other from crooked casinos.
Wim and I communicate via email, as well. However, I do not feel the need to protect the FL group. If they are honest, they can take care of themselves. Apparently, you and I agree on one thing and one thing only, charge backs are wrong acts to commit, as it ruins gambling for the honorable player and does hurt online casinos.
Lastly, my post was being typed after I read your first post, and by the time I posted you had entered your second post. As much as I hate to be nice to you at this given moment, I will admit that had I read your second posting, I would have never bothered with mine. Your second post reflects the concerns of the player, which is what I thought this forum was all about. Protecting each other from crooked casinos.