New Slot Announcement Extra Chilli, BTG

[nikantw]

Optimum strategy has 96.82% TRTP and is achieved by .... always gamble your free spins!!



Ok, high TRTP for high rollers, not the 1st time we see this but I don't like it.
I advise people not to buy or gamble their features, not frequently anyway.

 

[shadow123]

Thats a first,advising the player to gamble the hard won feature.
Wonder what charity they donate unused spins to,kangaroo orphans sounds good.

 

[goatwack]

Wow. Wadda line to include in the help files.

I see how that would make perfect sense

noooot

 

[smart_croatia]

Play it for free now!

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Edit: It is a little buggy with frequent errors though.

happy dayz ty slotplayer ca ya on stream

 

[smart_croatia]

tbh i dont think that BTG will make slot that replace bonanza and make it second choice

 

[Gaz237]

On that link that Interlog put up, the minimum bet is 20p.

Is this going to be the setting?.

I was thinking that now they have lowered the buy it feature to 50X, it was only going to be £5 to buy.

Bit of a pisser if you still have to shell out £10 like the Rabbit

 

[dunover]

OK, the BTG chap who allowed me to make the video a week early wanted to be very sure people understood the feature gamble can lose ALL the spins on the first two attempts. To that end I have made a video to help people get a feel for it with 10 features played with NO gamble used, i.e. the 8 or 12 spins it tends to trigger with.

I then played 10 bonus rounds whereby I gamble the feature from 8 to at least 16 spins, i.e. used the gamble function twice. See what you think.

 

[interlog]

Well the link that I posted no longer contains the game.... didn't take too long for the powers that be to remove it I guess.

 

[Jd666]

Well the link that I posted no longer contains the game.... didn't take too long for the powers that be to remove it I guess.

When I tried it yesterday, I bought a feature, it brought HOT in and a win from Tens.
Froze my laptop on the cascade and had to reboot it.
I hope it does this on release so I cant play the fooker

 

[dunover]

Well the link that I posted no longer contains the game.... didn't take too long for the powers that be to remove it I guess.

Yes, BTG are rightly protective of their new masterpiece and thus only pre-selected persons with permission could review/play the game - any 'unofficial' links are quickly spotted and nullified. Be patient, on Wednesday next everybody will have the chance to see and play the demo when it goes live. Somebody is being a bit naughty if they've been allowed a special privilege of a demo game and then posted it publicly. Next time BTG won't be including that person in their pre-release list I'd imagine!

 

[colinsunderland]

So first 10 features without gambling
3 were over 1 x stake and broke down to, 1 was 11x another 2 were slightly over 1x, rest were under the stake.

Lets be clear too, you buy a feature at £50, the stake is £50 not £1. Casinos confirm that by not letting you buy the feature using a bonus as it exceeds the max stake. If the stake is £1 then it would be allowed.

Sorry mate, but if you were playing that for real money the amounts of bastards you would have been shouting would have exceeded any other video you have done, do you have to be positive about it for the early access or something?

 

[interlog]

Yes, BTG are rightly protective of their new masterpiece and thus only pre-selected persons with permission could review/play the game - any 'unofficial' links are quickly spotted and nullified. Be patient, on Wednesday next everybody will have the chance to see and play the demo when it goes live. Somebody is being a bit naughty if they've been allowed a special privilege of a demo game and then posted it publicly. Next time BTG won't be including that person in their pre-release list I'd imagine!

I haven't got a clue how this website managed to get the game in demo mode. Perhaps it was a simple as doctoring the link to the game from bonanza to extra chilii?

 

[bluebirdy]

The 2nd video makes it look even worse than the first. I have asked you UKGC to comment on this slot

 

[snorky510238]

OK, the BTG chap who allowed me to make the video a week early wanted to be very sure people understood the feature gamble can lose ALL the spins on the first two attempts. To that end I have made a video to help people get a feel for it with 10 features played with NO gamble used, i.e. the 8 or 12 spins it tends to trigger with.

I then played 10 bonus rounds whereby I gamble the feature from 8 to at least 16 spins, i.e. used the gamble function twice. See what you think.

Agree with the symbol clarity issue(bonanza is better) and I am colour blind so the blue and purple look the same to me which really takes the thrill out of it especially when they could have used yellow or black.Most games it doesn't matter because the shapes are different but chilli is not going to be that enjoyable for me. Not sure the gamble is a good idea either.I can just imagine someone chasing a loss/waiting a bit longer than average for the bonus/having that impulsive moment to gamble only to hit black.I think the thread will outstrip bonanza in the long run. By the way is 117,649 still the top megaways or is it less?

 

[dunover]

Agree with the symbol clarity issue(bonanza is better) and I am colour blind so the blue and purple look the same to me which really takes the thrill out of it especially when they could have used yellow or black.Most games it doesn't matter because the shapes are different but chilli is not going to be that enjoyable for me. Not sure the gamble is a good idea either.I can just imagine someone chasing a loss/waiting a bit longer than average for the bonus/having that impulsive moment to gamble only to hit black.I think the thread will outstrip bonanza in the long run. By the way is 117,649 still the top megaways or is it less?

Still the same. 117649 max. ways.

 

[dunover]

I haven't got a clue how this website managed to get the game in demo mode. Perhaps it was a simple as doctoring the link to the game from bonanza to extra chilii?

No, it would have to have some kind of developer source at this stage, from BTG to that specific slot.

 

[dunover]

So first 10 features without gambling
3 were over 1 x stake and broke down to, 1 was 11x another 2 were slightly over 1x, rest were under the stake.

Lets be clear too, you buy a feature at £50, the stake is £50 not £1. Casinos confirm that by not letting you buy the feature using a bonus as it exceeds the max stake. If the stake is £1 then it would be allowed.

Sorry mate, but if you were playing that for real money the amounts of bastards you would have been shouting would have exceeded any other video you have done, do you have to be positive about it for the early access or something?

I (perhaps unwisely) will respond your insinuation-laden and usual borderline flaming negativity:

1. Conveniently you mislead with that post by deliberately ignoring the fact that for the first 10x£50 I demonstrated with no feature gamble my net returns were around 750-800, a substantial gain.

2. The second section of 10 using gamble were not as successful but as a whole over the whole 20 I broke about even, or a small gain IIRC.

3. My video reviews have always attempted to fully explain a new slot and if I think it's awful or good I'll say so - every time. Look at what I thought about BTG's dreadful Temple Quest to remind yourself. Extra Chilli is similar to Bonanza and it's no secret on here or YT I love that slot, so wouldn't it be reasonable to expect me to like this one?

I get used to feeding the trolls on YT comments, but on here I expected better.

 

[colinsunderland]

I (perhaps unwisely) will respond your insinuation-laden and usual borderline flaming negativity:

1. Conveniently you mislead with that post by deliberately ignoring the fact that for the first 10x£50 I demonstrated with no feature gamble my net returns were around 750-800, a substantial gain.

2. The second section of 10 using gamble were not as successful but as a whole over the whole 20 I broke about even, or a small gain IIRC.

3. My video reviews have always attempted to fully explain a new slot and if I think it's awful or good I'll say so - every time. Look at what I thought about BTG's dreadful Temple Quest to remind yourself. Extra Chilli is similar to Bonanza and it's no secret on here or YT I love that slot, so wouldn't it be reasonable to expect me to like this one?

I get used to feeding the trolls on YT comments, but on here I expected better.

So because I don't agree with you about a slot then I'm trolling or flaming. Does that not mean you are the same by disagreeing with me?

I'm not trolling, I'm giving my opinion. That is all.

Actually just adding this, the bit about you having to be positive was a genuine question, if thats what you mean by trolling, it wasn't. BTG aren't exactly up there with the most trustworthy companies, it wouldn't surprise me one bit if they have implied to people reviewing the slot that if the review isn't good, then it will be the last time they get early access. Having said that, obviously if they did people wouldn't say so, so I apologise for that, it does read like I was having a go at you, and I wasn't. I like your videos and have actually defended you against the trolls on YT more than once.

 

[dunover]

So because I don't agree with you about a slot then I'm trolling or flaming. Does that not mean you are the same by disagreeing with me?

I'm not trolling, I'm giving my opinion. That is all.

You are not simply disagreeing with me as you damn well know, but insinuating that I have been influenced to be positive about the game in return for early access. Don't try and change the clearly explained substance of my reply which refers specifically (and was bolded) to the part of your post that infers just that. Take your accusations elsewhere.

 

[colinsunderland]

You are not simply disagreeing with me as you damn well know, but insinuating that I have been influenced to be positive about the game in return for early access. Don't try and change the clearly explained substance of my reply which refers specifically (and was bolded) to the part of your post that infers just that. Take your accusations elsewhere.

I've just added something to my earlier post regarding that.

 

[interlog]

Watched both of the review videos now and it does appear to be an interesting game to be played.

Not sure about the gamble feature though. You need the spins to build the multiplier for a decent win. But I would be kicking myself gambling it two times and then not getting any spins during the bonus (starting from a 3 scatter drop in), especially after having waited ages for the bonus round.

Dunover, how does the base game behave itself? Does it keep you going akin to Bonanza?

 

[interlog]

The 2nd video makes it look even worse than the first. I have asked you UKGC to comment on this slot

Why? It seems to play pretty fair to me. As a matter of fact, after all of the bonuses were played, Dunover came out with a small profit.

 

[nikantw]

The 2nd video makes it look even worse than the first. I have asked you UKGC to comment on this slot

There are much bigger problems out there. I don't even think Extra Chilli has a problem.
You will end up with 2.00 max bet and 5,000 max win if you keep pushing the rules in that direction.

 

[goatwack]

Not sure how many big wins are to be had with the bonus at (let's face it) eight spins, I'd imagine the base game is where it's at.

12 spins is a prerequisite on a game like this, I don't believe eight to be sufficient, although as we know the cascades can go on little streaks to create an additional 8-10 spins 'artificially' on a good day

 

[bluebirdy]

Why? It seems to play pretty fair to me. As a matter of fact, after all of the bonuses were played, Dunover came out with a small profit.

All BTG games can play piss poor on features and bonanza is the worst we all Know that game can be a right fucker. now adding a buy feature and a gamble feature is just wrong. Tell me how pissing away 8 spins for 4 is a good thing? then gamble again for a 4 more (even dunover in his first video was shocked and thought he had 4 spins to play after his first gamble).

whats the odds you getting a good result after x amount of gambles and losses. in dunovers first video he lost 3 gambles straight away, So if that was real money he would be chasing X amount of money after 1 min play time 1 MIN. with white rabbit atleast you get to play the free spins and how many of them was piss poor add a gamble to that game and its a joke.

now lets say you do get max spins whats the odd you getting a good result to cover all your gambles. if its the same as bonanza you pretty much fucked.

yes you do have option to buy then gamble or to just buy but cant you see this being a problem with weaker gamblers?.


Plenty of moans in the bonanza thread this one going to be a lot more.