- Joined
- May 22, 2012
Mmmmmm...
I never thought muslims were a 'race' myself. Opposing a medieval belief system that is generally very antipathetic to European traditions and culture doesn't make one a 'racist' nor does saying that gun/gang and knife crime is predominantly an issue in the black community, or that renting houses and turning them into cannabis farms is a crime heavily favoured by the Vietnamese community. These are facts and even the esteemed ex Race Relations Commissioner in the UK, a black gentleman called Trevor Phillips has recently been on TV advocating that we should stop shouting down people that dare to mention 'race specific' negatives otherwise nothing ever gets achieved and it divides people more than ever.
Interlog lives in the UK, in London in fact. From his perspective everything he said is correct - maybe not worldwide as was pointed out with the IRA/UDA/ETA/FARC etc. but I have checked this and since the IRA ceased to be active a long time back now, EVERY terror attack there has been Islamic in motive.
Getting heated up about things may not work, but appeasement and political correctness absolutely doesn't work. He is also Dutch and is probably aware of the havoc wreaked on his home country by a large recalcitrant part of the population, most of which never gets near the selective stories covered by the media unless it's to criticize Geert Wilders.
Whether his posts were reported or not isn't relevant to me, but the fact that those of certain opinion that consider themselves 'liberal' are ALWAYS the ones that use these facilities knowing they will be carrying out the very illiberal act of curtailing somebody else's freedom of expression, never ceases to amaze me.
What has it achieved? OK, a member has been booted for 15 days no doubt to the delight of one or two anonymous informers. As I saw it people like Dionysus were doing fine correcting his pronouncement of an all-muslim terrorist world and balancing things out. Now we have lost a decent member who many of us have met and have just cemented the way he feels about things, marginalized him, divided ourselves - exactly what the scum that murder our children are trying to achieve.
So now those with opposing views have lost the opportunity to correct him with the keyboard, using knowledge or refined argument or logic. So who wins?
You people not in the UK will probably understand this as I'm sure your respective countries have suffered their own vile acts by the proponents of 'the religion of peace' but let me remind you: people are ANGRY, upset and are faced with fear of speaking out due to PC laws, frustrated by the Police seeming more concerned about 'community cohesion' and are frustrated that nobody seems willing to acknowledge the obvious, that you cannot force oil and water to mix.
I never thought muslims were a 'race' myself. Opposing a medieval belief system that is generally very antipathetic to European traditions and culture doesn't make one a 'racist' nor does saying that gun/gang and knife crime is predominantly an issue in the black community, or that renting houses and turning them into cannabis farms is a crime heavily favoured by the Vietnamese community. These are facts and even the esteemed ex Race Relations Commissioner in the UK, a black gentleman called Trevor Phillips has recently been on TV advocating that we should stop shouting down people that dare to mention 'race specific' negatives otherwise nothing ever gets achieved and it divides people more than ever.
Interlog lives in the UK, in London in fact. From his perspective everything he said is correct - maybe not worldwide as was pointed out with the IRA/UDA/ETA/FARC etc. but I have checked this and since the IRA ceased to be active a long time back now, EVERY terror attack there has been Islamic in motive.
Getting heated up about things may not work, but appeasement and political correctness absolutely doesn't work. He is also Dutch and is probably aware of the havoc wreaked on his home country by a large recalcitrant part of the population, most of which never gets near the selective stories covered by the media unless it's to criticize Geert Wilders.
Whether his posts were reported or not isn't relevant to me, but the fact that those of certain opinion that consider themselves 'liberal' are ALWAYS the ones that use these facilities knowing they will be carrying out the very illiberal act of curtailing somebody else's freedom of expression, never ceases to amaze me.
What has it achieved? OK, a member has been booted for 15 days no doubt to the delight of one or two anonymous informers. As I saw it people like Dionysus were doing fine correcting his pronouncement of an all-muslim terrorist world and balancing things out. Now we have lost a decent member who many of us have met and have just cemented the way he feels about things, marginalized him, divided ourselves - exactly what the scum that murder our children are trying to achieve.
So now those with opposing views have lost the opportunity to correct him with the keyboard, using knowledge or refined argument or logic. So who wins?
You people not in the UK will probably understand this as I'm sure your respective countries have suffered their own vile acts by the proponents of 'the religion of peace' but let me remind you: people are ANGRY, upset and are faced with fear of speaking out due to PC laws, frustrated by the Police seeming more concerned about 'community cohesion' and are frustrated that nobody seems willing to acknowledge the obvious, that you cannot force oil and water to mix.