- Joined
- Nov 25, 2004
- Location
- Finland
The fact and it is a fact is the majority of terrorist attacks that kill people are in the name of Islam. [...]
That's way too narrow view of terrorism. Social and political context can't be ignored if there is a serious discussion about causes of terrorism. I believe Arun Kundnani has stated that: "the official narrative implies that, once an individual has adopted an extremist religious ideology, terrorism will result, irrespective of the political context or any calculation on the part of an organisation or social movement."
Also, if a muslim commits an criminal terrorism act, it is viewed differently by the media and policy makers: again Kundnani's words: "political violence committed by Muslims is interpreted as symptomatic of a wider clash of values and identity, political violence from the far Right has been downplayed and interpreted as a matter of “lone wolves” operating outside of any broader enabling environment."
You also can't leave out foreign policy decisions.
Like always, when heinous criminal acts like this happen, sensible people are shocked and outraged. And rightly so. There's no excuse or acceptable justification for terrorism. But in a civil society, we should be able to freely discuss all aspects of terrorism. It's not easy to do so, when these acts happen in your doorsteps or you or someone you know is killed or hurt.
But rather than making the discussion of causality an issue of faith, more comprehensive approach is needed. There are studies indicating that in many cases religion or ideology of a terrorist is thin and superficial.
The media reporting in general mostly follows the current official narrative (which ever it may be). And that's creating more problems than offering solutions IMO.