- Joined
- Dec 5, 2005
This is exactly the kind of purposeful lawyering that just destroys the fun in online gambling. Obviously the bonus rule is there to prevent advantage gamblers from betting a certain size, the OP is clearly a casual gambler, and won their amount with a valid bet, and its very common in gambling to increase your bet a bit after a nice big win.
I mean I understand Mummy's had a published rule, but ffs, is it that hard for a casino to read between the lines, and treat their guests and recreational gamblers fairly when it is an obvious case of non-abuse? If he's an overall net loser at his £6/spins there really is no reason for Palace to act like that.
Pardon the interruption, I'm just sick of casinos who pull out gotcha clauses to steal from casual gamblers. It reminds me of fishermen who catch dolphins in their tuna nets, frankly.
I mean I understand Mummy's had a published rule, but ffs, is it that hard for a casino to read between the lines, and treat their guests and recreational gamblers fairly when it is an obvious case of non-abuse? If he's an overall net loser at his £6/spins there really is no reason for Palace to act like that.
Pardon the interruption, I'm just sick of casinos who pull out gotcha clauses to steal from casual gamblers. It reminds me of fishermen who catch dolphins in their tuna nets, frankly.
