Hi guys
Here's a poser for you that i'm too dumb to fully work out. Take a 9, or better still a 15, line slot like Tomb Raider.
If you play 15 lines at 25c per spin - thats $3.75. But only one of those lines can achieve the maximum payout (or probably even a major payout) due to the organisation of the symbols. So 14 of the lines are effectively wasted (aside from minor wins)
So if you play just 1 line at 25c, surely that means that every spin you have the chance to win a major or max payout.
Now take the "House-edge" for these slots - is it probably set up against playing all 15 lines? If "yes", does this mean that, more boring 'tho it may be to play, you'd do better playing just 1 line all the time? I'd assume this would increase the variance but potentially much more lucrative?? If "no" then surely the house edge is in reality much lower than advertised?
Just a thought.
Simmo!
Here's a poser for you that i'm too dumb to fully work out. Take a 9, or better still a 15, line slot like Tomb Raider.
If you play 15 lines at 25c per spin - thats $3.75. But only one of those lines can achieve the maximum payout (or probably even a major payout) due to the organisation of the symbols. So 14 of the lines are effectively wasted (aside from minor wins)
So if you play just 1 line at 25c, surely that means that every spin you have the chance to win a major or max payout.
Now take the "House-edge" for these slots - is it probably set up against playing all 15 lines? If "yes", does this mean that, more boring 'tho it may be to play, you'd do better playing just 1 line all the time? I'd assume this would increase the variance but potentially much more lucrative?? If "no" then surely the house edge is in reality much lower than advertised?
Just a thought.
Simmo!