- Joined
- Jan 20, 2004
- Location
- Pictland
Fill yer boots! Not that I've noticed anyone being uncharacteristicly restrained.Guess based on that we can all just speak plainly at each other now, right?
- Max
Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
All Games
Popular Bonus Filters
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Popular News Sections
About Us
Fill yer boots! Not that I've noticed anyone being uncharacteristicly restrained.Guess based on that we can all just speak plainly at each other now, right?
I suppose you are the iGaming jurisdictions' equivalent of Lord Longford.Well, no, if by "throwing assertions" you mean having observations based on what I've seen and read herein and hereabouts. When the pessimists and prophets of perpetual doom are belting it out full throttle it behoves those of us with opposing views to speak and speak plainly.
- Max
Got to this point in your post and as such there is no point reading any further, as you nail it right here with this part of your post.But to gain any respect there would need to be retrospective action and prosecution of the criminals both inside and licensed by the place. Proper investigation of the accounts of the known hundreds of fraudulent casinos which have profited in the years (still ongoing) of fraud, laundering and then identification and prosecution of persons in the master license money trail and seizure of funds if possible. Remember the word 'fraudulent' here, not the good eggs.
I have no idea who Lord Longford is but in essence I'd agree. And why the hell not? If the end game is improved conditions for players then yes, full steam ahead, if they can manage it.No matter the wrong committed, the evil, or the crime, rehabilitation is always possible
This was the point I was going to mention, and a strong test of whether they are genuinely turning over a new leaf, or just covering up the stench as you put it. If the criminality is as strong as indicated, while the money may be long gone, it doesn't stop the potential for criminal prosecutions.I notice not one proponent of accepting the mealy-mouthed verbiage from this scandalous banana republic has mentioned the most inportant 'R' - restitution. Reform, yadda yadda, is all very well. But to gain any respect there would need to be retrospective action and prosecution of the criminals both inside and licensed by the place. Proper investigation of the accounts of the known hundreds of fraudulent casinos which have profited in the years (still ongoing) of fraud, laundering and then identification and prosecution of persons in the master license money trail and seizure of funds if possible. Remember the word 'fraudulent' here, not the good eggs.