- Joined
- Jul 10, 2016
- Location
- North east England
Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
All Games
Popular Bonus Filters
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Popular News Sections
About Us
They were played like a piano and they even sang alongRemember all that red tape Brexit was going to get rid of?
Apparently the fisherman are going bust because they're not filling enough paperwork in. Paperwork that didn't exist before Brexit..
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
View attachment 149269


Bit hard to judge without knowing what that "very sensible proposal" was in real life, just bad EU wanna make musicians lifes hard?
But if worse things after few weeks are some companies are not capable to do their paperwork and didn't bother to take it as an option that these will occur after Brexit and some musicians have bit harder time with their traveling, would say that these maybe not yet are end of the world or very huge catastrophe for whole nation![]()
It's not about the Ed Sheerans and the Elton Johns of this world who've already got it made, they're giving a voice to smaller bands and touring musicians who this is going to hit hardest, and are least able to weather the storm and meet the extra costs.
The EU offered the UK a perfectly workable solution to this problem, the UK rejected it because it didn't TAKE BACK CONTROL.
And like with the fishermen, TAKING BACK CONTROL means throwing British businesses and workers onto the bonfire of Brexit.
Those poor musicians.......getting up at 12 hungover from last nights gig. Living outside of the rat race playing instruments and singing for a living....my heart bleeds....
I appreciate your tongue was perhaps slightly in your cheek there bamber but you do realise that the lifestyle that most musicians have is pretty tough? CD sales aren't really a thing these days and streaming revenues are miniscule, so they have to tour long and hard, spending months on the road away from their families and friends, to try and make a living from their art.
And even if some of them do enjoy the lifestyle and/or have fun in the process of earning their living, why resent them that?

Yeah, i just thought it sounded weird to say it had nothing to do with brexit, and then mention the bureaucracy and other things that only exist because of brexit.It seems a combination of the pandemic, which has cut demand, and bad negotiating, over Brexit.
A combination of the two it seems, at least thats what he is saying.
Anyone mentioned Nissan staying in Sunderland?..
They are pausing one of their production lines due to difficulties in getting parts in from Europe.Not heard anything new, have you?
Anyone mentioned Nissan staying in Sunderland?..
Anyone mentioned Nissan staying in Sunderland?..
It's good news, obviously, not just for the thousands of people directly employed there, but also the tens of thousands of jobs in the wider supply and support chain that rely on it.
However, let's remember that this is just 'something that stays the same as before', it's not a 'Brexit Benefit' or anything like that, Nissan have been in Sunderland since 1984 and have invested in it massively over the years, so for them to shut up shop and move the plant somewhere else would be hugely expensive. Also, Nissan explicitly stated that in the event of No Deal Brexit the plant would become non-viable so the Brexit Deal 'saved' the plant in that regard, but it only needed saving in the first place because of the threat that Brexit posed to it.
I'm still waiting for anyone to list an actual Brexit benefit, because so far all we've got is a load of things getting worse and in the case of Nissan, we're left 'celebrating' over the fact that something has simply managed to stay the same as it was before.
Isnt the whole "sold the fishing industry down the drain" and "hell of alot of bureaucracy as part of the deal" because of brexit tho?
Or am i missing something?
Sounds to me like hes saying "this has nothing to do with brexit, but has everything to do with brexit"![]()
The battery situation is an accidental and unintended consequence of the new 'rules of origin', that means it's beneficial for Nissan to produce the batteries in the UK.Not really.
The future of the plant was in doubt. They had postponed the making of a new car but have now went ahead with it. And they are now going to make the batteries in UK instead of importing them from Japan thanks to the new Tariff's.
Quite different from just staying the same.
No, that's doesn't help these poor fish guys who are doomed. It seems that most of people have survived quite well already in very beginning of this Brexit thingie, don't see UK members complaining much here how shops are empty and you run out of food.
This bureaucracy what comes was there all to see like VAT:s and other things, i would bet that most of people survive and can cope with them. Some of course keep blaming Brexit about everything next twenty years and tell stories their grand children how Brexit ruined their coming million businesses and just because of that they ended up to sit in local every day having pints. When starting next soon multimiollion business, maybe have learnt value lesson to be prepared for changes and try to think all possible different scenarios instead of relying on everything to something you read from bus side.
Of course there are negative things for many, but most seem to be able to come over some challenges, it's not a question anymore if it happens or not but it happened and best for everyone probably is trying to live with that, UK have been damaged for some world wars and other things, this seems to be just another day in the office with some new regulations and which you just need to adapt. These worse case scenarios yet haven't been something that people wouldn't survive, i'm sure your social security can feed these poor fishermans if really needed or maybe some even learn to eat their own fish and start to build market for it inside of UK, wonder if you can sell something for all other countries but not one particular, maybe some come out with some new fish products made for UK market, could also believe that many would be happy to buy local fish if you just make it to be tasty and ok priced for people, maybe worth of trying, even wouldn't get the same price what used to from exporting it French who eat weird things.
) - the sales pitch for Brexit wasn't based around, 'Yes there'll be a load of new regulations and some industries will suffer and the fishermen will be completely fucked and you might all need to start eating langoustines and mackerel whilst also creating a UK market for these out of thin air'.UK MPs can't overrule EU law mack, this is what being a third country means, along with leaving the single market and the customs union.We need the MP's to run the rule over this red tape as it sounds like the the govt/civil service may have created overly complicated requirements and procedures; that's how a democracy works, you need people to check things and ask questions. [press and journalists included]
Implying the only solution is to rejoin the EU is a bit much.
UK MPs can't overrule EU law mack, this is what being a third country means, along with leaving the single market and the customs union.
Some people tried to point all this out in 2016, back then it was known as 'Project Fear'.
EDIT - For clarity, the UK government hasn't conjured all this red tape up for a laugh, the red tape is what's now involved in trading with the EU. It hasn't helped that UK IT systems weren't ready and still have problems, but fundamentally the red tape is there because that's what trading with the EU as a third country involves. It's not going away and the UK government can't make it go away, in fact it literally just enacted it.
Yes, a lot of SME EU businesses have reduced or even ceased trading with the UK because it simply isn't worth their while to do so now.So it's the same in reverse for the EU traders to uk customers?
Once again Slottery (I feel like we've had this discussion before) - the sales pitch for Brexit wasn't based around, 'Yes there'll be a load of new regulations and some industries will suffer and the fishermen will be completely fucked and you might all need to start eating langoustines and mackerel whilst also creating a UK market for these out of thin air'.
In the medium to long term yes, it's arguably not a bad idea to produce and eat more of our own food, but there was never anything stopping this from happening before Brexit however changing eating habits is a slow process and Brits have simply never shown much appetite for a lot of what we catch.
And businesses are being ruined by Brexit, right now, it's happening. It's not necessarily visible (yet....) to many people because the Tescos and Nissans of this world are large multinational organisations that can take on the extra red tape and costs (although much of it will ultimately be passed to consumers), however many SMEs in the UK are already in dire straits and Brexit isn't even a month old yet.
It's all very well saying that businesses need to change and adapt, but first of all they need to survive, and in many cases that simply isn't going to happen.
On the point you've made several times about businesses should have prepared better, here's a single example (of many!) where the UK government advice was wrong, and errors in the IT systems made it impossible for businesses to prepare properly.
View attachment 149541
Also:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
View attachment 149542
UK government advises UK businesses to, erm, set up shop in the EU to avoid Brexit red tape.
No, really.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
View attachment 149585
View attachment 149586

Did you read the article?
It explains how companies who have traded successfully with the EU for decades are now drowning in red tape, and in some cases are being advised to set up businesses in the EU to enable them to continue trading. This is all new, it's all post-Brexit, it didn't exist before the end of transition.
Also the UK can no longer be used as a 'hub centre' for EU goods, so one company has now moved their 'hub' business to Poland.
UK businesses, UK jobs, moving to the EU as a direct result of Brexit.
That's literally exactly what the article said.Thatcher pioneered the EU single market as we know it - not a single currency or a single parliament.
The article cites several examples. There are also some to be found just in the last few pages of this thread.Hard to present a fact based argument when there are no specific facts or examples of company A has lost X because they were not notified of Y.
I understand it was not for all businesses and there would be disruption to trade. The whole thing is about trade and now we are open and free from the chains that bound us. As a result there will be ongoing changes/disruption to trade.
They will push and pull and so will we. We now have the freedom to do so.
No, we had our own puppet parliament.That's literally exactly what the article said.
And as I'm sure you noticed, we weren't in the single currency and we still had our own parliament, whilst also being an EU member.
Now we're no longer an EU member, we still have our own currency and we still have our own parliament, but we've blown our own feet off when it comes to trade.

The article cites several examples. There are also some to be found just in the last few pages of this thread.
Out of interest, what were the 'chains that bound us' before? What can we do better now that we couldn't do whilst still an EU member?
All I've seen so far are bad news stories when it comes to businesses and Brexit, I'd be genuinely interested in seeing some good news stories to balance that out.
The best we seem to have managed is the Nissan plant not closing down, but that's been there since 1984 so we can't exactly sell that as a Brexit win.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
The article i read was non specific generalisation.
The chains that bound us before i think were the financial ties to failing economies - bailouts of countries crashing. And the limitations on trade with countries outside the EU compared to members.
Not to mention, although complete speculation on my part, that the EU was never going to be a player in the East V West economic shift. We are better positioned now to trade on a worldwide basis.
Not seen the other articles you mentioned, hence why maybe im so ill informed and could be missing the point.
Bambi:Had a scan through The Dossier and some of the points (only went through the first 5 or 6) could be argued as favourable for the future.
Its clear we will not agree on the effects of Brexit yet and I guess the best thing is to embrace the change and hope for the best. In a year or two we will be able to see the real effects I guess.
