Yes, I did see the cheating part, but I'm not sure anyone can safely say that about 3Dice without any kind of long-term data. In regards to the 95% RTP and losing it all, I think it happens a lot....it certainly does with slots which have a similar RTP in some cases.
Did you also see the casino hold % of
live casino BJ? 12%
. On that basis, it may well be that online BJ has a better return than live BJ. Unfortunately, as it has been said, we all tend to remember the horrible bad patches and streaks but the times we hit 1000+x bet and RJ's etc seem to just fade away. The main problem is that many gamblers expect to win when they play, and then get pissed when they lose......and consequently do not make a big deal when they have a good run because they "expect" it to happen that way. If one thought the opposite way, and expected to lose every time they played, the big surprises would be the nice hits and the winning streaks rather than the losing streaks. We quite often see people complaining about losses being reminded by a rep or another member that they hit $xxxx a few weeks back, and then stating "oh yeah I forgot about that" or "I guess when you factor that in I'm actually in front".
If one is going to gamble in the long term, one needs to take a long term view...and that includes everything from a nice jackpot to a horrible bad streak. In the long term, both will happen and everything in between.
Anyway, if Enzo says your RTP is ~95%, then it should be easy to prove him wrong by getting your hand history. It's one thing to say "I don't like 3Dice or any other software's BJ because I never seem to win".....it's quite another to say "3Dice BJ is not fair/random and Enzo just tells everyone they have a similar RTP". One is an opinion based on experience, the other is an accusation/implication that someone is cheating/rigging games. When asked for evidence of such, they answer is invariably "well prove I'm wrong" which is a great cop-out and releases the accuser/complainer from any responbility to substantiate their "opinion" (read:accusations). It is incumbent upon the person making the accusation to provide proof, not the person questioning it's validity. Can you imagine what would happen if courts worked that way? Where you had to prove you
didn't do something rather than the crown prove that you
did?
I challenge anyone who believes 3Dice (or any other) BJ is unfair to obtain their complete hand history and calculate their RTP, and compare it with any figures obtained from the casino. I've only seen one person do it (Nashvegas) and he failed to prove anything whatsoever (except that maybe he had a few kangaroos loose in the top paddock).
Let's forget the opinions and implications and arguments......let's see some real data from those who have put forward this "theory"
Who's first???
(excuse me if I don't hold my breath.....)