Front page of Google means nothing if no-one is searching for what you have!
Shown below - result #1 from 22,400
Whilst that's actually quite impressive a result in itself (I'm genuinely impressed) - I'm pretty certain it's a very low value search term. I used to be given these reports when I was working for a large casino affiliate site as Editor (to be used for content, etc) of the "value search terms" (I'm sure some affiliates know the reports I'm referring to - the people I was working with were buying ours but I imagine it's possible to get them for free - basically each search term listed in some tangible form of $ worth for the purpose of ranking their value) - and I just can't ever remember seeing "10c roulette" on any of those lists. I could be wrong but I vaguely remember "$5 roulette" or "$5 blackjack" scraping in at some point but this was some time ago.
Not to mention the obvious fact that someone searching 10c roulette is not going to be close (in terms of potential value) to someone searching $5 roulette.
I'm genuinely impressed though - but I can see why 10c roulette isn't making you rich despite being
Result 1 of about 22,200 for 10c roulette - I mean, there's eBay auctions on Google front page SERPs for that search term.
But even though WagerWitch's listing was a blog link (now not showing so I don't know what's going on lol), it was smack there above all the "related searches" and anyone going to Page 2 is likely to see it - for like a top 5 or top 10 value search term (at least back when I last looked at one of these "value lists") -
Results 1 - 10 of about 37,800,000 for online casino
Caveat: I could be talking gibberish - I'm really not even an amateur in regards to this stuff, let alone an expert. If someone could explain why it's now not showing, please do! I'm hella confused....
------------
No 5 for "online casinos" google.co.uk is pretty amazing webzcas. I'm am surprised it didn't bring in bucketloads of traffic, you are right there. But at the same time, I understand that 1 is god, top 3 is insane, front page is amazing, etc...
-----------
Every time I look at front page SERPs for high value $ keywords, I get depressed. So few of these sites are getting there via "legitimate" SEO. And, until just now (and I could be displaying my lack of knowledge in embarrassing fashion with the following), I really didn't know what Black Hat was apart from it being considered 'unethical'.
From a bit of reading, it sounds like it's basically just using tricks that Google says are not to be used. If that's correct, um - please don't jump down my throat if this is stupid - what's so bad about that? I say this because the game isn't fair as it is. Google, for whatever reasons, do not have the ability to create a level playing field where quality sites get the top SERPs -
how is "black hat" worse than spending millions on targeting link-buys or endless link-swapping, etc? It's all just as bad as the next technique, from what I can see...am I missing something really obvious here?
I mean, in a perfect world, you would have quality sites with quality content on Google front page, but the No 1 SERP for "online casino" - I mean, they're geniuses - their forum has less than 600 posts, in TOTAL. This forum has over 300,000.
When I used to play competitive rugby at uni (I didn't have enough pace to be any good, but we had Australian U/21 rep players in our team, so it was SERIOUS. BUSINESS.), if the referee wasn't policing some aspect of the breakdown correctly, and the other side was smashing you as a result, you'd be a very foolish side not to react accordingly.
Is this analogy a terrible one for the "black hat SEO" issue? Cause to my noob mind, that's how I'm seeing it at the moment. Please correct me if I'm being retarded...