- Joined
- Jun 30, 1998
- Location
- Bierland
Wham - bam, thank ya m'am (sir), that's it in a nutshell.Simmo! said:Thing is though, I see this as a CON problem. It's only they who can sort it, no-one else...
Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
All Games
Popular Bonus Filters
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Popular News Sections
About Us
Wham - bam, thank ya m'am (sir), that's it in a nutshell.Simmo! said:Thing is though, I see this as a CON problem. It's only they who can sort it, no-one else...
Casinomeister said:eCOGRA is set up for player issues, and this has always been made clear. They are fully aware of this situation and have been following this closely. But please bear in mind, for them to remain focused on what they are doing, it would not be practical to begin tackling issues that have been considered "affiliate" issues - or out of their realm. They simply to not have the resources and manpower to effectively take these sorts of issues head on.
Casinomeister said:The main thing I think is not to punish people or rogue the hell out of them, but to bring a serious issue to the surface and do something about it. I expect 888.com/casino-on-net to take immediate action on getting their collective shit together.
Trezz said:Just to clear things, your comments I'd not read before hitting the post button on my previous comments.
rowmare said:888.con
Casinomeister said:I've moved this from the Webmaster's Section to here since I feel that this affects everyone in this industry: affiliates, operators, players, etc.
Site scrapping and content theft are very serious issues that need to be halted now.
thelawnet said:I think no questions asked is the motto. Bring us the customers, and who cares if you are a dirty spammer?
jetset said:What are the affected webmasters doing about tackling this themselves in a cohesive manner? Is there any sort of affiliate umbrella organisation that is coordinating everyone into an efficient team to combat and manage this issue? CAP? iGAMI? Dom?
jetset said:Is there any sort of affiliate umbrella organisation that is coordinating everyone into an efficient team to combat and manage this issue? CAP? iGAMI? Dom?
rowmare said:At iGAMI we have been actively pursuing this issue since December, 2005. Unfortunately, we have not had much cooperation with other large gambling sites. We have already been through the same type emails showing at CAP from 888.com - closing of scraper sites (but only specific ones we brought to their attention), the promises to look into it... it's just a repeat of what iGAMI has already gone through.
So, we've helped to keep it going at CAP, where a very large number of webmasters can read what is going on. Hopefully something will come of this.Yes, I've seen a lot of posts on this at WOL and now here, but I guess what I'm getting at is something that is a little more comprehensive, planned and effective through a range of carefully assembled vehicles and options, with teams allocated specific responsibilities and integrated timeframes for each aspect.
If you're going to fight big business like 888 then the best chance of success lies in working the way big business does (financial restrictions notwithstanding) in an organised and more cohesive fashion imo.
If that can be put together on a large scale (and I am confident that webmasters/affiliates have the skills to do it) and applied with determination, then if 888 does not come right you guys could have a pretty formidable machine that can influence business significantly.
Let's focus on 888 and nothing else at this stage.
iGAMI was mentioned and then a question was asked, I answered. I did not intend for it to be a promo. As for the rest of your erroneous assumptions, in the interest of keeping the thread on the topic, I'll refrain from responding. If you have some good ideas, and are willing to donate your time to a non-profit organization, you are certainly welcome to do so. We want what is best for the industry.Chatmaster said:At the end of the day this thread is once again steering off on a doom because of IGAMI promos. Let's focus on 888 and nothing else at this stage.
It's cool - don't worry about it. I think that what we want to see as a collective whole - webmaster/player/operator/observer - is to see the casino take the bull by the horns and correct the major malfunction on their own without being told to do otherwise by any organised force or entity.rowmare said:iGAMI was mentioned and then a question was asked, I answered. I did not intend for it to be a promo. As for the rest of your erroneous assumptions, in the interest of keeping the thread on the topic, I'll refrain from responding.
Simmo! said:Google could seriously knock this big time. Trouble is they are hard to get through to...bigger fish to fry. Shame cos one flick of the switch, and it would all be over.
Webzcas said:Maybe pointing out a few hundred spammy sites all promoting the same brand on Matt Cutt's Blog might get their attention.
Simmo! said:Knowing now the way 888 marketing works, they probably beat us to it![]()