- Joined
- May 22, 2012
I'll be back, don't worry. People will miss my moaning, emissions and expletives. And the cat.
Craig slots was the only one I followed and subscribed too because he kept it real to begin with and for some reason I really rooted for him to do well. In recent times he diverted from realistic bets to max betting then ended up concentrating on buy in bonuses at max bet on the one slot again and again. It seemed as if the higher his subs got the less he catered for his viewers.
No wonder they cracked down on those who appeared to gamble irresponsibly,even if they where vocal about responsible gambling.
I watched many Dunover videos and liked them but I do agree gambling should be banned from Youtube, problem is not everyone is banned so the rules are a joke. Ban them all or ban none.
2018 the scurge of the snowflake, "ban this ban that" "think of the children". How I wish we could go back to the 80s or 90s when snowflakes like Nut Nut were laughed away.I watched many Dunover videos and liked them but I do agree gambling should be banned from Youtube, problem is not everyone is banned so the rules are a joke. Ban them all or ban none.
It has nothing to do with being targeted either, it's just simply being caught in the system of clean up and many others will follow soon i'm sure. Next stop is banning them off Twitch as that is another site designed for kids so what the hell is gambling doing on it??
I find your assessment hard to reconcile. If these 'jealous losers' have grounds to flag content as inappropriate then that is how YouTube works. You and I will very likely have differing opinions on what we deem as inappropriate. That's fine. We can choose to flag content bases on our views and that is also fine. But flagging something as inappropriate simply means YouTube will review the content and make a judgement call based on their terms of service.It has nothing to do with "responsible gambling". If it was, a channel such as the one by a streamer called Roshtein would have been gone by now if it was Youtube's' policy.
As Dunover already indicated in an earlier post, we're talking about a group of jealous, sore losing ex gamblers that are blaming all but themselves for their woes. They are a nasty bunch, I personally have had personal violent threats from them, hence part of the reason I no longer stream or produce videos.
I find your assessment hard to reconcile. If these 'jealous losers' have grounds to flag content as inappropriate then that is how YouTube works. You and I will very likely have differing opinions on what we deem as inappropriate. That's fine. We can choose to flag content bases on our views and that is also fine. But flagging something as inappropriate simply means YouTube will review the content and make a judgement call based on their terms of service.
If this situation is really about people flagging content as inappropriate then in this scenario YouTube are consistently siding with the complaints. Why? Because they hate craigslots and co or maybe, just maybe, they feel it's not appropriate content for their platform.
Suppose I setup a group of 'sore and jealous kitten haters' and when around trying to remove cat videos by mass reporting as inappropriate. Do you think I could get channels shut down by simply doing mass reports? I think this is unlikely as the content is most likely just banal and harmless. But can you say the same about the nature of gambling content.....? I'm not so sure.
Exactly it only takes one disgruntled person these days to get social media owners quaking, look at Facebook taking down innocent pictures of family children claiming they are somehow against their rules because a person may have seen them or someone thinks a video is promoting a certain extreme group. Social media is very wary at the moment of backlash so it will only take one person to get them looking at someone's account.With respect, I know the type of individuals that are behind this. I know exactly what is happening and why they are doing it and the lengths they will go through in their "campaign".
Audio copyright infringements are auto detected by Youtube as you upload the video. Anything else relies on it being reported to Youtube. It has nothing to do with "responsible gambling" or gambling per se. They found a way to get these channels closed and they are very selective on what channels they are targeting. Why are non affiliate gambling channels not being closed? That is the crux of the matter. These people detest affiliates making money off the back of gamblers losing at casinos. It really is as simple as that.
I watched many Dunover videos and liked them but I do agree gambling should be banned from Youtube, problem is not everyone is banned so the rules are a joke. Ban them all or ban none.
It has nothing to do with being targeted either, it's just simply being caught in the system of clean up and many others will follow soon i'm sure. Next stop is banning them off Twitch as that is another site designed for kids so what the hell is gambling doing on it??
About affiliate links for Youtube channel, the best way to get around it is to create a fake youtube account and post and pin a comment ( with your affiliate content) under your own video. See picture below (This way it works at the moment)
With respect, I know the type of individuals that are behind this. I know exactly what is happening and why they are doing it and the lengths they will go through in their "campaign".
Audio copyright infringements are auto detected by Youtube as you upload the video. Anything else relies on it being reported to Youtube. It has nothing to do with "responsible gambling" or gambling per se. They found a way to get these channels closed and they are very selective on what channels they are targeting. Why are non affiliate gambling channels not being closed? That is the crux of the matter. These people detest affiliates making money off the back of gamblers losing at casinos. It really is as simple as that.
Yep. That's what happened to me, then the next strike will come in the coming few days and it'll be 'game over'. Once the first strike occurs, the end is nigh.I've just checked out Craigslots YT account and it appears that he has not removed his own vids. "This video has been removed for violating Youtubes community guidelines".
Yep. That's what happened to me, then the next strike will come in the coming few days and it'll be 'game over'. Once the first strike occurs, the end is nigh.
He was also on the hitlist I mentioned above, like myself and the Bandit etc. Interlog will confirm I'm sure, but there is an aggressive and often unpleasant campaign going on.
The first post on the below linked topic elsewhere contains some of that hit list:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
There was another topic about streamers / slot video producers before that over on that forum.
And yes, the campaign is very unpleasant.
The first post on the below linked topic elsewhere contains some of that hit list:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
There was another topic about streamers / slot video producers before that over on that forum.
And yes, the campaign is very unpleasant.
I have just been looking through Youtube.
You seen this Mark?
I couldn't make it past the 1st paragraph as my blood was already boiling. People like that are the reason why governments are piling rules and laws one of top of the other. Some people were enjoying making videos, I was enjoying watching them and now I can no longer do it because some massive asshole didn't like the videos and isn't adult enough to take responsibility for what he does. Fuck him.
Were you forced to watch them on Youtube? If not what difference does it make to you if they are available elsewhere?[
They can still make the videos. You can still watch them. What they cannot do (seemingly) is use the YouTube platform to distribute their content.
Try to keep some perspective.
My point is a platform owner retains the right to determine what content can and will be hosted and distributed on their platform. For example casinomeister forbid the hosting of certain types of content on their website and that is perfectly acceptable. If you don't like it you can always go elsewhere right?Were you forced to watch them on Youtube? If not what difference does it make to you if they are available elsewhere?