what do people make of prima poker?

Thing with these Prima sites is that they offer gr8 Proms and Huge Freerolls which does make them very attractive and fun to play on... So i don't have problem with site but i do have a problem with some of the players!
The Best PrimA sITE MUST BE DREAMPOKER.COM, RIVERBELLE AND CRAZY... OTHERS ARE OK NOT AS NICE AS THESE.
 
In reply to this.

whiterat1 said:
If you are a licensed bookmaker in the UK or Ireland, why would you risk your license for using some cheating poker software. You would not. They get money from rake and the like. I, as a rule only play on sites that have skins in a legitimate jurisdiction and have members that have something to lose. Kanawawkee and ecorga are worthless.

Prima has a few books on it along with crypto. #2red is on Prima and that is a meister fav. Maybe you play agaisnt me at prima. I will put a hurt on you.

WHITERAT on prima

Hi
i am a new member but was not going to join until reading this and want to set the record straight. i know a lot about the online gaming industry and licences etc etc and the UK and NI bookmakers that have licences NONE are licenced in the UK - Ni....so none would lose there licences if anything untoward came out regarding online poker.


My understanding is that the UK and NI bookmakers who use prima network are nomore than affiliates whop earn a rather high % from microgaming so the only winners here are the latter mentioned. i quickly add that it is not only prima network william hills operations regarding poker are based abroad <cyprus> even though the remainder of there industry is based in the UK..work that out for yourself and dont mention tax it has nothing to do with this..

In 2007 the gaming commission in the UK and NI is taking a massive overhaul of online gaming and all these companies WILL be licenced in the UK or they will not be able to operate poker rooms and the tests on these sites will go deeper than at the moment where a south african company grants licences to these companies can youreally and honestly believe this??<price waterhouse coopers> who grant licences to say the RNG is trustworthy..i mean really cmon SOUTH AFRICA??? one of the most corrupt countries in the world..

Anyhow im sure after reading this doubters will come along and say ahh another guy who has lost well sadly i dont play online anymore and all it would take is a few simple minutes to come across 100 reasons why online not only poker but casinos are not what they seem..an example does yahoo poker use an RNG??? go have a look and you tell me if theres any difference between that and what you pay to play with at online rooms andwell we already know the answer..thing is YAHOO does not have to go to SA for a licence cos they know they have NO RNG..so whats the big difference?? there is none..A question thats asked a lot is why would companies steal when they have an huge profit everyday from a rake??? quite simple if you were a businessman and be honest if you were making $3m a week but had the opportunity to make $10m ..would you or wouldnt you??? and the punishment for being caught??? a lost licence in SA..and 100s of $m in the bank..anyhow i expect a few replies to this but wlel please dont just take this as another bad loser cos that i aint..

have fun thats why were here.
 
craig_AA said:
Hi
i am a new member but was not going to join until reading this and want to set the record straight. i know a lot about the online gaming industry and licences etc etc and the UK and NI bookmakers that have licences NONE are licenced in the UK - Ni....so none would lose there licences if anything untoward came out regarding online poker.


My understanding is that the UK and NI bookmakers who use prima network are nomore than affiliates whop earn a rather high % from microgaming so the only winners here are the latter mentioned. i quickly add that it is not only prima network william hills operations regarding poker are based abroad <cyprus> even though the remainder of there industry is based in the UK..work that out for yourself and dont mention tax it has nothing to do with this..

In 2007 the gaming commission in the UK and NI is taking a massive overhaul of online gaming and all these companies WILL be licenced in the UK or they will not be able to operate poker rooms and the tests on these sites will go deeper than at the moment where a south african company grants licences to these companies can youreally and honestly believe this??<price waterhouse coopers> who grant licences to say the RNG is trustworthy..i mean really cmon SOUTH AFRICA??? one of the most corrupt countries in the world..

Anyhow im sure after reading this doubters will come along and say ahh another guy who has lost well sadly i dont play online anymore and all it would take is a few simple minutes to come across 100 reasons why online not only poker but casinos are not what they seem..an example does yahoo poker use an RNG??? go have a look and you tell me if theres any difference between that and what you pay to play with at online rooms andwell we already know the answer..thing is YAHOO does not have to go to SA for a licence cos they know they have NO RNG..so whats the big difference?? there is none..A question thats asked a lot is why would companies steal when they have an huge profit everyday from a rake??? quite simple if you were a businessman and be honest if you were making $3m a week but had the opportunity to make $10m ..would you or wouldnt you??? and the punishment for being caught??? a lost licence in SA..and 100s of $m in the bank..anyhow i expect a few replies to this but wlel please dont just take this as another bad loser cos that i aint..

have fun thats why were here.

I think you may have missed my point. While these sites are not licensed in UK for poker, they do at least have brick and mortar assets. I have to disagree with your statement that if they lost their license in SA or any other jurisdiction if you have no effect on their UK operations. I would imagine in their charter for their UK gaming license would have a provision about unetehical business practices and/or fraud or cheating, which would cause them to lose their license. No matter where these actions took place.

Just to carify will hill is on cryptologic not prima, and I just cited them as another reason to feel comfortable playing on the crypto network.

Further, I think my original thoughts on this over 2 years ago were correct(before I knew about CM and was trying to figure out on my own which sites were trustworthy), as very rarely, if ever, are there any complaints about Cryptos not paying. This also holds true for prima, with the execption of some sites which have poor CS, bonus crediting issues and extensive documents for cashouts, which always get sorted out in the end. It has also been my experience on Prima that the bookmaker sites have best CS.

CHEERS
 
no disrespect

whiterat1 said:
I think you may have missed my point. While these sites are not licensed in UK for poker, they do at least have brick and mortar assets. I have to disagree with your statement that if they lost their license in SA or any other jurisdiction if you have no effect on their UK operations. I would imagine in their charter for their UK gaming license would have a provision about unetehical business practices and/or fraud or cheating, which would cause them to lose their license. No matter where these actions took place.

Just to carify will hill is on cryptologic not prima, and I just cited them as another reason to feel comfortable playing on the crypto network.

Further, I think my original thoughts on this over 2 years ago were correct(before I knew about CM and was trying to figure out on my own which sites were trustworthy), as very rarely, if ever, are there any complaints about Cryptos not paying. This also holds true for prima, with the execption of some sites which have poor CS, bonus crediting issues and extensive documents for cashouts, which always get sorted out in the end. It has also been my experience on Prima that the bookmaker sites have best CS.

CHEERS

but i feel you have totally missed the point im making..do you seriously think companies like for example stanjames,32red, will seriously suffer in the UK if anything was come against prima???? 32red,stanjames dont hold the licenses prima does and well need i go on its really self explanatory...these companies would be the innocent victims THATS why they dont hold online poker themselves...geee
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top