<div class="bbWrapper"><blockquote data-attributes="member: 48096" data-quote="mack341" data-source="post: 1104088"
class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-title">
<a href="/forums/goto/post?id=1104088"
class="bbCodeBlock-sourceJump"
rel="nofollow"
data-xf-click="attribution"
data-content-selector="#post-1104088">mack341 said:</a>
</div>
<div class="bbCodeBlock-content">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent ">
If a slot annoys me with slow spins, or even frequent crashing, it does not help me to gamble sensibly. Frustration is not a good mix with gambling, and this is introducing artificial frustration, what was the point of bringing in SOWS and affordable gambling checks if not to make sure people could afford to gamble, now past that hurdle they have to endure imposed paint drying boredom speed <img src="/forums/styles/default/casinomeister/smilies/rolleyes.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll Eyes :rolleyes:" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /><br />
<br />
I can see people playing at higher stakes and doing less spins, increase the potential for a decent base game hit and leave. I'd rather retain the option of quicker spin speeds even if it meant a stake limit, so once you go north of £1 the spins slow down, what's wrong with trying something that has a bit of flexibility?
</div>
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandLink js-expandLink"><a role="button" tabindex="0">Click to expand...</a></div>
</div>
</blockquote><br />
Im not sure what kind of people are in the ukgc, but i get the feeling that the people making decisions in Spelinspektionen (our version) has little, or no knowledge at all about slots.<br />
If they did, they would focus more on enforcing high rtp:s and the like to protect players instead of all the crap they do.</div>
