Kept seeing the Sci-Fi thread bumped, thought I'd impart my observations of 'Picard', as I finally mustered up the courage to watch it. It was either there or here - here won!
I'd heard nothing but negativity around the show, and even grabbed the popcorn as I chortled to some of the user reviews on Amazon
But of course they turned out to be humorously-exaggerated bluster, the show is in no way as 'leftist', 'feminist', or whatever else 'ist' people have been drumming up in their ire.
It's just good ol'-fashioned Sci-Fi fan-service, of course it's never going to be a continuation of TNG or follow any of Gene Rodenberry's 'vision'. It's set further on, gone is the soft-focus and whimsical fairytales and in its stead we have something you'd expect the future to have turned out.
It's like when people expect bands to sound the same for 30 years, it's stupid. That was then, this is now.
That's to no way state Picard is better in any way to TNG, of course it isn't. He looks like a turtle and with Fat Data in tow it can be quite a shock at first, though one soon acclimatizes (unlike The Irishman, for example).
Also worth pointing out that Star Trek has always broken new barriers with 'leftist/ progressive' ideals, the show has been doing it since its inception, such as featuring the first interracial kiss (Nichelle Nichols) etc.
So yes, the naysayers should really button it. This ain't no 'Discovery' and is far from awful, really. Even if watched following on from The Expanse, and that says a lot