The last fake streamer thread ever needed.

[Spikie]

I see both sides , seeing those stakes and wins can make you want the gamble for the big one , but I can also say that watching streamers has also stopped me depositing when I fancied a flutter ..

So it can work both ways , send people super tilt or reduce their gambling .

An outright ban is unlikely to yield results , as anything banned will create markets that weren’t open before .

You would just get everyone streaming from a Russian platform somewhere getting affiliate pay in crypto or cocaine

 

[dionysus]

you proo-mote, ve zend you goot, goot vife...goot deal, yes?

 

[mack341]

I see both sides , seeing those stakes and wins can make you want the gamble for the big one , but I can also say that watching streamers has also stopped me depositing when I fancied a flutter ..

So it can work both ways , send people super tilt or reduce their gambling .

An outright ban is unlikely to yield results , as anything banned will create markets that weren’t open before .

You would just get everyone streaming from a Russian platform somewhere getting affiliate pay in crypto or cocaine

The bandit did use to reserve high stakes for certain occasions, like reaching 20,000 subscribers, then he'd do £10 spins for one video but recently it's been in nearly every video. Watching dazza's vids and the bandits, 1 or 2 each a week probably saved me a few pennies over the years and gave me plenty of chuckles so I can see an upside. But they weren't streamers, I did use to watch nickslots for a while but the humour wasn't really the same, it was more a case of interacting with fan boys and answering lame questions about which slots are the best and so on...

 

[Spikie]

I generally only watch the highlight videos on YouTube , I don’t have the patience to sit through a 3 hour livestream.

And still skip the boring bits ..... so most things I watch don’t last very long

 

[geordiecolin]

Imagine being at the Meister Meeting in London and calling another member a cunt. You would have been asked to leave - no exceptions.

I introduced myself to you as the Pornhub Casino Rep and your face was a picture to behold yet I was not ushered out!
Me thinks that you are softer than you make out

 

[mina1929]

Oh thank god everyone is friends again

@Jono777 can I have a glass of sparkling please

 

[Jono777]

Oh thank god everyone is friends again

@Jono777 can I have a glass of sparkling please

Anything for one of my CM faves

 

[mina1929]

Anything for one of my CM faves

View attachment 109161

Sweet Jono

 

[dealer wins]

I would be board stiff watching streamers live, but really enjoy seeing the "biggest win" compilations and its nice to see my fav slots actually dropping these amazing wins that I could only dream of hitting!!!

 

[Supababe]

Gaz was the one disrespected - he is owed a sincere apology - as well as one for the community since no one here should be subjected to read those sort of posts. Playford knows how to get a hold of me if he wishes to, and I can put him in contact with Gaz. If Gaz is ok with this, then we can go from there. This seems to me the fair thing to do.

Just a quick question....
As a teacher I have had a child do something horrible to another child in the heat of the moment.

After a little talking to, child A fully admits the mistake, understands that they broke the school rules and are rightly in trouble and not allowed to play out at lunchtimes. As the teacher I am aware that child A might actually have a lot going on at home that could be affecting his temper and behaviour.

After missing playing for a day or two, child A speaks to child B and gives a sincere apology at which Point child B takes the huff, ignores child A, turns and walks away.
Should I continue to insist that Child A missed lunchtime play with his friends (who he perhaps needs in his life right now) because child B wasn’t ready to accept an apology (or is even enjoying playing the innocent victim)?

I was just interested in your views....

 

[goatwack]

I'm starting to think this is a metaphor for something else. Just can't place it

 

[greylady]

I'm starting to think this is a metaphor for something else. Just can't place it

Some people would rather play the victim than accept an apology ....or maybe the ulterior motive for the antagonistic comments has been met

 

[goatwack]

#FreePlayfordAlreadyItWasAMistakeHePaidHisDues

Not sure if that's catchy enough

 

[dionysus]

Just a quick question....
As a teacher I have had a child do something horrible to another child in the heat of the moment.

After a little talking to, child A fully admits the mistake, understands that they broke the school rules and are rightly in trouble and not allowed to play out at lunchtimes. As the teacher I am aware that child A might actually have a lot going on at home that could be affecting his temper and behaviour.

After missing playing for a day or two, child A speaks to child B and gives a sincere apology at which Point child B takes the huff, ignores child A, turns and walks away.
Should I continue to insist that Child A missed lunchtime play with his friends (who he perhaps needs in his life right now) because child B wasn’t ready to accept an apology (or is even enjoying playing the innocent victim)?

I was just interested in your views....

I suppose it depends.
Is child A repentant and the apology sincere, or the child merely aplogizes for form just in order to be allowed to play with their friends then continue where they left off

When it comes to adults, everyone has an off day. If it's several off days, well, they're adults and responsible for their actions and need to learn to leave their shitty attitudes at home or park them at the door

 

[goatwack]

Booooo

Who let the mod in

 

[dionysus]

Booooo

Who let the mod in

*looks around

dont see anyone's name in blue here

 

[colinsunderland]

I suppose it depends.
Is child A repentant and the apology sincere, or the child merely aplogizes for form just in order to be allowed to play with their friends then continue where they left off

When it comes to adults, everyone has an off day. If it's several off days, well, they're adults and responsible for their actions and need to learn to leave their shitty attitudes at home or park them at the door

And it could depend on if Child B is a twat and enjoying getting Child A into trouble, and having fun trying to stop Child A playing with his mates for as long as possible.
I suppose you should look at previous behavior too, if Child B has a lot of previous form for goading other children to get them into trouble, then maybe it's child B who should be stopped from going out and playing with his friends at playtime.

 

[dionysus]

I say put all kids on leashes and little light electric shock collars

at least the ones who wake me every morning playing hoops

 

[goatwack]

Ok I'm 97% sure this isn't about kids anymore

 

[colinsunderland]

Ok I'm 97% sure this isn't about kids anymore

 

[Valhalla]

Child A - Child B

But we're not children here. And anyone who knows Bryan knows how much he loathes the C word being thrown around.

I don't know much of the history of Gaz <or> Playford (nor do I hold an opinion on either of them), but Playford is in the wrong here simply for failing to act mature.

 

[mcgameboy]

#FreePlayfordAlreadyItWasAMistakeHePaidHisDues

Not sure if that's catchy enough

It's not the lack of catchiness that's the problem, it's the lack of accuracy.

Calling someone a C, THEN implying that is he bored, unemployed and recently dumped by his wife is a little bit more than "a mistake" mate.

 

[goatwack]

Calling someone a C, THEN implying that is he bored, unemployed and recently dumped by his wife is a little bit more than a mistake mate.

I'm not defending the word he chose, it was rather florid, but we've all posted things akin to Rainman and gone "Uh-oh"

It was a riled-up bad post, but it's coming up to two weeks and I'm pretty certain he regrets that incident. So time to move on from it

 

[irish-ranger]

Take child A grab by the scruff take child B grab by the scruff
And bang thier bloody heads

 

[ternur]

Just a quick question....
As a teacher I have had a child do something horrible to another child in the heat of the moment.

After a little talking to, child A fully admits the mistake, understands that they broke the school rules and are rightly in trouble and not allowed to play out at lunchtimes. As the teacher I am aware that child A might actually have a lot going on at home that could be affecting his temper and behaviour.

After missing playing for a day or two, child A speaks to child B and gives a sincere apology at which Point child B takes the huff, ignores child A, turns and walks away.
Should I continue to insist that Child A missed lunchtime play with his friends (who he perhaps needs in his life right now) because child B wasn’t ready to accept an apology (or is even enjoying playing the innocent victim)?

I was just interested in your views....

General observation here, not related to the issue with gaz/playford as such.

Surely children learn from adults and a teacher has a big influence on a child who's views on morality and social skills are developing.

But we are talking about adults here. At some point enough is enough and apologies might be just empty gestures. People need to take responsibility of their actions and words. You can't get away with constant abuse just because you repent. That's just an ostensible way of showing remorse. The offended party can reject this kind of apology if they choose to. Some might not understand it or take it as if they are "playing the victim". That's not the point though. It about the parties involved and what they feel is a proper way to react to the situation.

This is not a kindergarten. It's Bryan's house and Bryan's rules. It's not hard for an adult to know how they should behave while a guest at someone's house. Either show respect and civility or not. You choose. And you are responsible for your actions. People get away with too much these days, especially online.

Moderation of verbal communication is a trait which you can learn. If you choose not to, then that's really falls on you.

 

[Gaz237]

WOW, Just WOW,

There's an awful lot of assumptions and insinuations from Supababe, Greylady and as for your post Colinsunderland. accusation and an insult.

Funny how bullying was mentioned, Like a pack of wolves. circling.

Playford caused his own downfall, using the C word and abusing members of ones family, that seems to be ok with you lot.

And that was less than 30 mins since his last ban finished after abusing another member.

Real classy clique, glad I'm not a member

 

[Mr_Slot5]

OK, my 2pence worth. I know I'm a 'newbie' member but I've been a lurker for years.

I see both sides, and both sides have faults. Long before I noticed Playford's wonderful way with words, I noticed Gaz's ability to speak down to people. I'm sorry Gaz, I know this might just be your style, but you're rather blunt, to the point and sometimes condescending. I've seen instances where you've spoken to people in a way where you'd have got my back up had it been me you'd spoken to like that.

BUT

On the other hand, Playford was completely out of order for the way he reacted. Sometimes keeping your cool and putting your rebuttle across a bit more succinctly is much more effective. Unfortunately he went for the throat. Even if someone has a valid point, if they react like Playford did, they will likely get penalised.

 

[Borgie]

So did the apology happen?

 

[Mr_Slot5]

Gaz, just to be clear I'm not attempting to denigrate you. I'm just attempting to balance things from both perspectives. I personally have no issues with you at all. I appreciate that people have different posting styles

(just don't be too shocked when some people take offence!)

 

[Gaz237]

Gaz, just to be clear I'm not attempting to denigrate you. I'm just attempting to balance things from both perspectives. I personally have no issues with you at all. I appreciate that people have different posting styles

(just don't be too shocked when some people take offence!)

Nah your fine.



Bryan sent me a message in regards to Playford.

This was my reply. Not heard nothing since.

Hi Bryan

If I'm honest, the fact he brought my wife into the abuse, no apology would ever suffice.

But at the end of the day, it's your house and I don't want to leave you stuck in the middle.

I'm guessing you have or will have words with him in regards to this and other personal attacks.

I do agree with you that he should make a public apology to the forum.

I had messages from people that were quite shocked at his post and relieved he had been banned.

Anyway, as I said, will leave it with you. It doesn't really bother me either way as long as it doesn't happen to anyone again.

Cheers

Gaz.

I think I have been fair considering, but the clique seem to have made their own minds up.

 

[SpinUk]

Nah your fine.



Bryan sent me a message in regards to Playford.

This was my reply. Not heard nothing since.

Hi Bryan

If I'm honest, the fact he brought my wife into the abuse, no apology would ever suffice.

But at the end of the day, it's your house and I don't want to leave you stuck in the middle.

I'm guessing you have or will have words with him in regards to this and other personal attacks.

I do agree with you that he should make a public apology to the forum.

I had messages from people that were quite shocked at his post and relieved he had been banned.

Anyway, as I said, will leave it with you. It doesn't really bother me either way as long as it doesn't happen to anyone again.

Cheers

Gaz.

I think I have been fair considering, but the clique seem to have made their own minds up.

Isn’t the main differance here if his insults based on truth? I.e he brought your wife into it if your wife had just left you or something similar. Otherwise its just a vague, unfocused attack on your masulinity and nothing more.

Maybe be a bit more magnanimous, and take on board the other comments numerous others have taken on your previous posts (which are based on truth).

 

[Gaz237]

Isn’t the main differance here if his insults based on truth? I.e he brought your wife into it if your wife had just left you or something similar. Otherwise its just a vague, unfocused attack on your masulinity and nothing more.

Maybe be a bit more magnanimous, and take on board the other comments numerous other have taken on your previous posts (which are based on truth).

Why would I be magnanimous after his tirade,

Jeez, shall we also forget the C word and the list of other derogatory comments. You can't justify Playfords repeated actions.

Playford being banned is down to him. not me.

He had only been back 30mins from a 7 day ban for insulting someone else. Guess that's my fault as well?.

 

[irish-ranger]

Why would I be magnanimous after his tirade,

Jeez, shall we also forget the C word and the list of other derogatory comments. You can't justify Playfords repeated actions.

Playford being banned is down to him. not me.

He had only been back 30mins from a 7 day ban for insulting someone else. Guess that's my fault as well?.

You stated playford being banned is down to him and so it is yet you then follow thru with "he'd only been back 30 mins " ETC for god sake man leave it where it is and stop looking the sympathy vote..

It's done finished endex move on

 

[paul7388]

My take on this.

For once Gaz never posted anything to get the response he received from Playford . Notice the for once lol as Gaz has a way of baiting people at times.

As for Playford yes it was a bad response. But several of his posts on many subjects can be classed as extreme . But he just has strong views but so do other members and the odd Mod so can't ban him for that.

So taking a look from Management perspective. We have a member who was back from a ban for very short time and got himself banned right away. So guessing Bryan is in an awkward place as he is trying to do what is best for his forum.

Guess it all comes down to that C word again. Yes i know some find it most offensive word out. But is it anymore offensive than some of the " political " views on here. Is it any more offensive than the word rape and raping which gets used daily to describe slots.

I am just one of those people that really do not see how anything wrote on here could cause that much trauma and upset people that much. It is an adult forum tho at times you would not believe it. But seriously i do not see the need for bans because someone upsets another member. That was the case it would be an empty forum as there are a few that are very easily offended.

Don't like someone ignore them. Argue your point if you wish but no need to get abusive . Got to admit been a few times i would like to say what i really think about some things but better to just not do it lol.

 

[Gaz237]

How am I looking for the sympathy vote?..

I only came back to the thread because of Supa/Grey/Colins comments.

And I posted my reply to Bryan. As I said to Bryan I couldn't careless if he comes back or not, which I don't.

Don't affect me one way or the other. I posted to show it was not me stopping him from returning.

And the 30 mins comment was because people were blaming me for his ban, neglecting his previous. If you can only conduct yourself in a proper manner for 30mins after a ban, says a lot.

 

[snorky510238]

It’s all down to personal opinion in what we find acceptable or unacceptable. As adults we should have learnt over the years a certain amount of etiquette and decorum and apply it at all times.

To a certain degree it will depend on the circles you mix in as to where the line is and within those circles you judge what is acceptable or unacceptable.

When I am ‘with the lads’ sure I mix it up like everyone else does and within that group it’s acceptable but if I am in company I am not familiar with then a different etiquette is required.

Given the fact that most members have never met face to face and that this forum is open to all (who behave) then there has to be a certain level of respect and decorum.

We all know the rules and if you post things outside the boundaries you know what to expect.

We all say things in the heat of the moment but this is slightly different as in you actually have to type it and read it (maybe some don’t) before you post it. Which would give most people time to reflect and change their mind.

I often see heated debates on here and think if those people actually met face to face they might like each other we only have words on a screen to judge by and I think most people run deeper than that.

One thing I find intriguing when it comes to language when venting our anger is that if we write the word in full we get gasps from the balcony but if we write #*^% it’s ok even though everyone knows what we mean. I am guilty of that one myself (not with majorly offensive words). Why? I have observed other posts and made a judgment that this generally seems acceptable. If it wasn’t I wouldn’t do it.

 

[greylady]

WOW, Just WOW,

There's an awful lot of assumptions and insinuations from Supababe, Greylady and as for your post Colinsunderland. accusation and an insult.

Funny how bullying was mentioned, Like a pack of wolves. circling.

Playford caused his own downfall, using the C word and abusing members of ones family, that seems to be ok with you lot.

And that was less than 30 mins since his last ban finished after abusing another member.

Real classy clique, glad I'm not a member

Last I am going to say on the matter!

You talk about Playford not learning but pot and kettle spring to mind. I have been on the receiving end of your abrasive, condescending and sharp tongue but remained polite, that is just me, I don't use expletives to express myself in reality so why would I on here? That was the end of it and I watched you move onto someone new as you have many times and when you get a reaction you dig a little deeper, someone was always going to retaliate and you are not totally blameless.

As to a clique, so people who have agreeing opinions have now become a clique and are being likened to 'a pack of wolves, circling' kind of says it all as to your mentality - poor me!

 

[Supababe]

I’m sorry but I’m not sure how having people I like, respect, enjoy the company of, and in some strange way, ‘care about’
Could ever be constituted as a ‘clique’.

I come to the forum to catch up on gambling stuff, read the latest threads and answer/help to posters in as positive way as possible.
Other than my sulks about GAG, I don’t ever recall being argumentative, disrespectful or negative to anyone, least of all you Gaz. Feel free to point out any of my posts that you think aren’t like that.

At the end of the day, I just want folk to get along and I want my friend back.

And for the record, some of the ‘clique’ had already messaged Playford to tell off about his post prior to his ban.

 

[dunover]

Really?

This is all kicking off again?

Any chance of some posts here actually pertaining to the thread title?

 

[Supababe]

Really?

This is all kicking off again?

Any chance of some posts here actually pertaining to the thread title?

My apologies sir. I probably asked my curious question in the wrong place x

 

[Jono777]

My apologies sir. I probably asked my curious question in the wrong place x

Trouble is where is the right place?

As much as I appreciate and respect the forum rules, I am getting increasingly fed up of the growing "seen and not heard" approach here.

 

[irish-ranger]

Really?

This is all kicking off again?

Any chance of some posts here actually pertaining to the thread title?

Lock her up dunny this thread has ran its course

 

[goatwack]

The thread title's more of a jokey statement. It's not like it's asking "Are big -money streamers genuine?"

Because as we know, the answer'd be a resounding 'no'

 

[mcgameboy]

Lock her up dunny this thread has ran its course

He might lock YOU up for calling him dunny

 

[irish-ranger]

He might lock YOU up for calling him dunny*

Story of my life eh lol

 

[Supababe]

Lock her up dunny this thread has ran its course

Don’t lock me up! Unless it involves handcuffs and PVC of course x

 

[Jono777]

Don’t lock me up! Unless it involves handcuffs and PVC of course x

...and pictures

 

[dunover]

Don’t lock me up! Unless it involves handcuffs and PVC of course x

Now I have to go out with that image running through my mind...

 

[goatwack]

Now I have to go out with that image running through my mind...

"Here comes the man with the pillow" is what they'll shout

 

[mack341]

Now I have to go out with that image running through my mind...

try not to think about it, here's an alternative pic of the possible new conservative leader to take your mind off it