VismundCygnus
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2018
- Location
- London
This has been bubbling a lot lately and I think its a devious enough phenomenon to deserve it's own thread.
Basically a lot of slots recently are coming out with a caveat in the rules basically saying that even though you get a massive win in the game, it will only be partially paid out due to a win cap that is applied on top of any winnings.
As an example this post from @Harry_BKK (who was too busy to create this thread) highlights such a case from a Realistic slot called Super Graphics - Lucky Cats.
I personally think this is pretty garbage, as there are always ways to design the game/allowed stakes to avoid having such an artificial cap.
Basically a lot of slots recently are coming out with a caveat in the rules basically saying that even though you get a massive win in the game, it will only be partially paid out due to a win cap that is applied on top of any winnings.
As an example this post from @Harry_BKK (who was too busy to create this thread) highlights such a case from a Realistic slot called Super Graphics - Lucky Cats.
Invalid URLDidn't know where to stick this and was too lazy to start a new thread. Came across it today while going through the latest demo links.
The first time I saw such a low value. Max win in the base game or free spins is 500x bet, the rest gets cancelled.
The top pay in the base game is also 500x bet for a 5OAK wilds. The free spins can have a multiplier x9 and higher, yet you would only get the 500x bet and the rest gets cancelled.
How does that affect the RTP is my question? Not to forget, that the limit is atrociously low.
The slot is from Realistic Gaming.
View attachment 107372
I personally think this is pretty garbage, as there are always ways to design the game/allowed stakes to avoid having such an artificial cap.