- Joined
- Aug 29, 2012
- Location
- Londonia
So people use streamers as reference, to validate the riggedness of slots?
The world's gone to hell in a handbasket
The world's gone to hell in a handbasket
Good you trust me!It's when, what, if and if you do, how much
What I have learned over the years though is to trust people with knowledge, and to not trust those without.
Try that for a while and you'll see a new world open.
I Think we use the word rigged or should I say take it in the wrong context when we relate it to slots not being random.What we should say is programmed.Rigged conjures up the image that it is fixed for you not to win that's not true because some of us win and others lose.Programmed means the outcome of the spin has been influenced by what's written in the programme and the outcome can only be within the parameters of the programme.That in itself in my opinion means it is not truly random but its the programmers job to make it appear as close as possible.The difference is that irrespective of what's in the programme we all have the same chance and the same things can happen to everyone.I think many people just don't understand full meaning of what "random" means...Example of randomness is if i would meet on the street or bus my school mate from school 20 years ago.If situation like this would happen then it would happen only once and never again.As before this moment we never contacted each other and live in different countries.But in slots things repeat all the time so they can not be completely random!That my opinion,and i would only change it if i would see any proof of randomness....
Why couldn't you have joined sooner eh? That summary could have spared us six years of tinfoil theories and rigged debate!I Think we use the word rigged or should I say take it in the wrong context when we relate it to slots not being random.What we should say is programmed.Rigged conjures up the image that it is fixed for you not to win that's not true because some of us win and others lose.Programmed means the outcome of the spin has been influenced by what's written in the programme and the outcome can only be within the parameters of the programme.That in itself in my opinion means it is not truly random but its the programmers job to make it appear as close as possible.The difference is that irrespective of what's in the programme we all have the same chance and the same things can happen to everyone.
Lol I wish I had, can't be posting here and playing slots would have saved me a fortune.Why couldn't you have joined sooner eh? That summary could have spared us six years of tinfoil theories and rigged debate!
I watch this guys streams almost regularly.He is online now spinning Foxin wins at £550 per spin No i did not see his viewers screens but i see very often what people recommend if he asks.It is based on their playing experience during that day on certain gaming provider.
It's been explained far better by others but essentially it just boils down to slot psychology and duping you into believing you're constantly 'winning'. By far the worst has to be Bonanza for its 1x stake count-up, so in effect you end up believing that eg 24p is progress.Just another question(apologies if this has been asked a million times)but what happened to the days when a win meant "win".Go back to the 1 Armed bandits at 1p a spin.Cherry on 1st reel smallest win at 2p but it was a win.Nowadays there are so many slots where 3 tens,jacks or whatever pay half your stake that's not a win.What I am thinking is there must be a reason because what game developer would put that in knowing it annoys the hell out the customers unless it was necessary(I accept it in games where multipliers are involved).Do they do it to make up part of the rtp with no risk.I mean hypathetically if you spin 3 jacks every spin at £1 a go and it returns 50p you have a 50%rtp but the player can never be ahead.Obviously nobody would play the game but given the fact that over a session we hit so many of them and they count towards the rtp seems a bit wrong because they are not "wins".
Yeah that's just unbelievable it's never morally right that you should be able to wager that amount on 1 spin.Never mind validating your account casinos should be asking to validate where you get that kind of money from.Not wanting to infect this thread with anti- streamer rhetoric, but spinning £550 per spin is obscene by anyone's standards, and should not be encouraged via any medium.
Don't care if it's his money, his nan's or the state's, it's the kind of betting that's going to skew people's expectations if ever I saw it
Ok, checked this slot on youtube...I guy got alot of deadspins here and just put in more and more and ofcorase on almsort last pin he hit the bonus...which was one spin. And when he gambled with his win sometimes he often got busted on black field when it was very tiny...I have to say I cn say this slot is very rigged in many ways. Not random at all. And these questionmarks symbols was not random when they came only now and then but always on several reel when they finally came. One of the most boring and money eating slot Ive seen.
And Red Tiger could be tight as hell sometimes and Im scared of them...sometimed you think the specal feature will start but it dont..and sometimes 10 times in a row...btw you know what Red Tiger slot that have the hight possible win x bet?
I Think we use the word rigged or should I say take it in the wrong context when we relate it to slots not being random.What we should say is programmed.Rigged conjures up the image that it is fixed for you not to win that's not true because some of us win and others lose.Programmed means the outcome of the spin has been influenced by what's written in the programme and the outcome can only be within the parameters of the programme.That in itself in my opinion means it is not truly random but its the programmers job to make it appear as close as possible.The difference is that irrespective of what's in the programme we all have the same chance and the same things can happen to everyone.
Just another question(apologies if this has been asked a million times)but what happened to the days when a win meant "win".Go back to the 1 Armed bandits at 1p a spin.Cherry on 1st reel smallest win at 2p but it was a win.Nowadays there are so many slots where 3 tens,jacks or whatever pay half your stake that's not a win.What I am thinking is there must be a reason because what game developer would put that in knowing it annoys the hell out the customers unless it was necessary(I accept it in games where multipliers are involved).Do they do it to make up part of the rtp with no risk.I mean hypathetically if you spin 3 jacks every spin at £1 a go and it returns 50p you have a 50%rtp but the player can never be ahead.Obviously nobody would play the game but given the fact that over a session we hit so many of them and they count towards the rtp seems a bit wrong because they are not "wins".
Yeah that's just unbelievable it's never morally right that you should be able to wager that amount on 1 spin.Never mind validating your account casinos should be asking to validate where you get that kind of money from.
Ok, checked this slot on youtube...I guy got alot of deadspins here and just put in more and more and ofcorase on almsort last pin he hit the bonus...which was one spin. And when he gambled with his win sometimes he often got busted on black field when it was very tiny...I have to say I cn say this slot is very rigged in many ways. Not random at all. And these questionmarks symbols was not random when they came only now and then but always on several reel when they finally came. One of the most boring and money eating slot Ive seen.
And Red Tiger could be tight as hell sometimes and Im scared of them...sometimed you think the specal feature will start but it dont..and sometimes 10 times in a row...btw you know what Red Tiger slot that have the hight possible win x bet?
Funny isn't it... the UKGC are looking at reducing the bet on B2 machines to 2 quid. But online... no such concerns. Bet as much as you want...
Crazy
I don't think he has any work for you as his main income comes from casino affiliate links plus he has 7 or 8 sub affiliates who are also popular streamers in Russia.His income reaches from £50-100K a month as casinos pay him 50-70% of revenue share.All this sounds exciting but as he is real compulsive gambler 90% of this money he loses back to casino.In Russia streamers don't use casino bonuses it is unacceptable!Luckily he started to put money aside into his girlfriends bank account....Can you ask him if there are jobs available where he works please.
Land based casinos in London already started to ask for proof of income as i had to bring in my payslips....Funny isn't it... the UKGC are looking at reducing the bet on B2 machines to 2 quid. But online... no such concerns. Bet as much as you want...
Crazy
Land based casinos in London already started to ask for proof of income as i had to bring in my payslips....
Sometimes i do high rolling in roulette maybe that is why!Hippodrome and Grosvenor casinos are the ones who asked.As manager from Hippodrome said that he remembers the time when boys used to come to casino with bags of money and nobody ever give a fuck about it where that money comes from!But now time has changed and as government changed the rules...Really?
Im popping onto a Cashino arcade today.
Better take a bank statement
Yes I did. Ok then you may regret lauhghing at me for saying its rigged just by watching youtube? Sound like its "fake news" just because I watch soemthing on youtube...what I see on that clip is not the same I would see if Iwas standing there playing like that guy or what?Yeah you watched the video from stopnstep didn't you... I hated what they did to the retail version. Plays nothing like the online version... it doesn't even have the Shamrock Lock feature on it - they took it off. Crazy.
Anyway it's not rigged. I'll explain the maths at the Meister Meet if you're there.
Not wanting to infect this thread with anti- streamer rhetoric, but spinning £550 per spin is obscene by anyone's standards, and should not be encouraged via any medium.
Don't care if it's his money, his nan's or the state's, it's the kind of betting that's going to skew people's expectations if ever I saw it
I don't think he has any work for you as his main income comes from casino affiliate links plus he has 7 or 8 sub affiliates who are also popular streamers in Russia.His income reaches from £50-100K a month as casinos pay him 50-70% of revenue share.All this sounds exciting but as he is real compulsive gambler 90% of this money he loses back to casino.In Russia streamers don't use casino bonuses it is unacceptable!Luckily he started to put money aside into his girlfriends bank account....